Formal reporting lines and working authority are drawn side by side for one lead program manager, with French and Raven's bases of power explaining why a sanitarian's order outweighs her plan. Searches like "pubh 6600 week 2 assignment example", "pubh6600 week 2 sample" and "pubh 6600 week 2 example" land here.
What a finished PUBH 6600 Week 2 role analysis looks like
Two diagrams carry the analysis across roughly five pages. The first reproduces the formal chart: manager, family health deputy, health officer, board. The second redraws the same position as a role set in Merton's sense, the full ring of people holding expectations of it: environmental health specialists who issue remediation orders, the medical director who signs case management protocols, a finance officer controlling a hiring freeze, a state grant monitor, families and landlords. A table then lists each relationship with three entries: what that party expects, what the manager can offer, and which of French and Raven's five bases of power operates in the exchange. The department is an illustration built from common county arrangements rather than a portrait of one. Two places where responsibility and authority part company close the analysis.
How a PUBH 6600 Week 2 example is structured
Placing the formal chart first lets every later claim be measured against it. The role set follows because the week asks where authority actually sits, and a ring of expectations shows that better than a hierarchy does. Merton's term is used narrowly, to widen the frame from reporting lines to everyone who places demands on the position. French and Raven then carry the explanation: legitimate power runs up the formal chart, while the sanitarian's order carries legal force, the medical director holds expert and legitimate power over protocols, and the manager relies mostly on expert and referent standing with families. The table keeps each relationship to one row so comparisons are quick. The two mismatches receive the closing pages because they predict where the manager will be blamed for outcomes she has no power to order.
The chart as drawn
Manager, deputy, health officer, board: the formal line fits in one column. The analysis reproduces it without comment so the reader sees what the organization claims before seeing what happens.
A ring instead of a ladder
Merton's role set gathers everyone holding expectations of one position. Drawn around the manager, it adds environmental health, the medical director, finance, a state grant monitor, families and landlords, most of whom appear nowhere on the chart.
Five bases, assigned
French and Raven name legitimate, reward, coercive, expert and referent power. Each relationship in the table receives one or two with a stated reason, which turns the typology into a finding.
The order she cannot give
Only environmental health can compel remediation. The manager's plan for a poisoned child therefore depends on a division she influences through information and goodwill, never by instruction.
Where blame will land
Two mismatches end the analysis: follow-up rates the manager answers for but cannot staff, and remediation timelines she reports but cannot order. Naming them predicts the conversations the role will keep producing.
Where marks go in PUBH 6600 Week 2
Role analyses are credited for revealing a gap the chart hides. The widest share goes to the mismatch between accountability and authority, established from specific relationships rather than asserted as a feeling that the manager lacks support. French and Raven's typology earns marks when each relationship is assigned a base with a reason; a paragraph defining all five and assigning none leaves the typology idle. The role set diagram is read for completeness, and omitting external parties such as the state grant monitor or landlords costs visible credit. Accuracy about public health authority counts, so the legal footing of a remediation order should be described correctly. Analyses ending in a wish for more authority fall short, because the course asks how a practitioner works inside the role as it exists.
Get a PUBH 6600 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Share the Week 2 prompt and rubric, and describe the position to be analyzed, whether your own or one your section supplies; the analysis arrives with both diagrams drawn and a relationship table, in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. A course reading on power or role theory replaces French and Raven wherever the prompt names one.
PUBH 6600 Week 2 questions, answered
What is a role set?
Robert Merton's term for the full set of relationships attached to one social position. A program manager has one job title but many role partners, each expecting something different: supervisors, peers in other divisions, funders, clients. Mapping the set helps your analysis show where expectations conflict and where the organization chart leaves out people who shape the role day to day.
Should I analyze my own position?
Many sections allow it, and it can produce the sharpest analysis because you know who really decides. Describe relationships by role, not by name, and keep the department unidentifiable. If your current role is very new or very narrow, a composite position like the sample's may give you more relationships to analyze. Check whether your prompt specifies one or the other.
Is French and Raven still an accepted framework?
It remains one of the most widely taught accounts of social power, and its five bases translate easily into public health settings. Raven later added informational power, and some courses teach that version. Use whichever your readings supply, but apply it relationship by relationship. A framework defined in a paragraph and never assigned to a specific exchange adds little to a role analysis.