Garrard's matrix, one row per study and grouped by chain link, forms the Week 5 evidence table in PHLT 8062, with a column naming the paragraph each row will support. Searches like "phlt 8062 week 5 assignment example", "phlt8062 week 5 sample" and "phlt 8062 week 5 example" land here.
What a finished PHLT 8062 Week 5 evidence table looks like
A wide table spanning several pages, the document holds one row per included study, the gray literature items from Week 4 among them and marked as such. Columns run in a fixed order: short citation, jurisdiction and period, design, data source, population, exposure as the study defined it, outcome as the study measured it, comparison, direction of the main finding, a blank appraisal column awaiting Week 6, and a final column headed Used in. Rows sit in three bands matching the policy chain: mandate to leave access, access to working while ill, and ill workers to outbreaks. The last band is visibly short. Beneath the table, a key defines each abbreviation and notes that findings are recorded by direction and type of measure, with estimates left in the source papers.
How a PHLT 8062 Week 5 example is structured
Garrard's method treats the matrix as the organizing tool of a review rather than a summary produced at the end, and the example follows that logic by fixing columns before any row is filled. Identical columns for every study are what later make comparison possible; a table where each row records whatever seemed interesting about that paper cannot be read across. Exposure and outcome columns keep each study's own definitions because those definitions differ, and the differences will drive much of the synthesis. The bands follow the chain from the Week 1 claims, so the table already carries the review's shape. The blank appraisal column is deliberate: quality is judged next week, and leaving the space visible prevents any finding from being entered without its caveat later. The Used in column comes last and holds the table accountable to the chapter it will feed.
Columns fixed first
Citation, jurisdiction and period, design, data source, population, exposure, outcome, comparison, direction, appraisal and Used in, set before any row is entered.
Definitions as the studies wrote them
One evaluation counts sick hours earned, another counts days taken. The table records each wording, since that is where later disagreements start.
Three bands
Mandate to access, access to working while ill, ill workers to outbreaks. The third band holds only a few rows, including the city evaluation from the gray literature sweep.
A column left empty
Appraisal waits for Week 6. The empty space keeps every finding from being cited later without its quality judgment attached.
Used in
Each row names the chapter section expected to draw on it. A row with no destination is either irrelevant or a sign the outline is missing something.
Where marks go in PHLT 8062 Week 5
Most of the credit for an evidence table sits in its column choices, because columns determine whether rows can be compared at all. A table recording author, year, sample and findings will summarize studies without letting anyone see why they disagree; recording each study's own exposure and outcome definitions is what makes disagreement legible, and faculty reward it. Banding by chain link earns credit for carrying the argument into the table. The Used in column is noticed by careful readers, since it shows every row is meant to do work in the chapter. Consistency and accuracy against the sources are checked. Points slip for findings copied as sentences from abstracts, for rows describing a study's conclusions instead of what it measured, and for tables sorted by publication year, which records a reading history instead of the evidence.
Get a PHLT 8062 Week 5 example written to your instructions
Attach the studies included so far, even partly read, plus the Week 5 table instructions and rubric. You get a matrix with fixed columns, each study's own definitions recorded, rows banded by the claim they serve, and a column showing where each will be used. The first table costs nothing, ready in 24 to 48 hours; every study in this one is a composite.
PHLT 8062 Week 5 questions, answered
What is Garrard's matrix method?
Judith Garrard describes a way of organizing a health sciences literature review around a matrix: one row per source, columns chosen for the topics being compared, filled in consistently so sources can be read across. The method treats the matrix as a working tool built during reading, not a summary written afterward. The example applies it to policy evaluations and adds a column pointing each row to the chapter section that will use it.
Do effect sizes belong in the table?
Some programs want them, and where studies report comparable estimates they help. The example records direction and type of measure only, because its composite studies use outcomes too different to line up numerically: hours of leave, self-reported shifts worked while sick, outbreak counts. Where your included studies share an outcome metric, a column for estimates with confidence intervals is worth adding, copied carefully from each source.
How long should an evidence table be?
As long as the included set, with nothing omitted and nothing padded. Every included study needs a row, and excluded studies do not belong. Readers tend to judge length against the search results: if the search reported more eligible studies than the table shows, the difference needs explaining. The example's short third band stays short on purpose, since padding it would hide the review's most important finding.