| Course | NURS 4300 BSN Capstone |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 3 |
| Paper type | Capstone search strategy |
| Length | About 770 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 4300 Week 3
Capstone Search Strategy: Overnight Care Clustering and Sleep in Older Inpatients
Student Name
College of Nursing, Walden University
NURS 4300: BSN Capstone
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Capstone Search Strategy: Overnight Care Clustering and Sleep in Older Inpatients
This strategy carries the Week 2 PICOT question into database language. The question asks whether grouping routine overnight care into planned rounds, rather than doing each task as it comes due, improves patient-reported sleep over the first three nights for patients 65 or older on a medical unit. The population, intervention and outcome became search concepts; the comparison and time frame were applied at screening. Stillwell et al. (2010) recommend searching on the population, intervention and outcome, since those are the elements indexers reliably tag, and that advice shaped the term map below.
Term Map
Table 1
Search Terms by PICOT Element
| Element | CINAHL subject heading | MeSH term (PubMed) | Free-text synonyms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Inpatients; Aged; Hospital Units | Inpatients; Aged; Hospitalization | hospitali*, inpatient*, older adult*, elderly, medical ward* |
| Intervention | Sleep Hygiene; Noise; Nursing Care | Noise; Nursing Care; Patient Care Bundles | cluster* care, sleep promot*, night* interruption*, sleep disrupt*, quiet time, earplug* |
| Outcome | Sleep; Sleep Deprivation; Sleep Quality | Sleep; Sleep Deprivation; Sleep Quality | sleep quality, sleep questionnaire*, actigraph*, Richards-Campbell |
| Related outcome (screening only) | Delirium | Delirium | delirium, confusion |
Searches as Run
Table 2
Search Log
| Database | Date | Search string | Limits | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINAHL Complete | Sept. 14 | ((MH "Sleep+") OR "sleep quality" OR "sleep disrupt*") AND ((MH "Inpatients") OR hospitali* OR inpatient*) AND ((MH "Noise") OR "cluster* care" OR "sleep promot*" OR "night* interruption*" OR earplug*) | 2000 to present; English; adults 18+; peer reviewed | 318 |
| PubMed | Sept. 15 | ("Sleep"[MeSH] OR "sleep quality" OR "sleep disruption") AND ("Inpatients"[MeSH] OR hospitalized OR inpatient*) AND ("Noise"[MeSH] OR "Patient Care Bundles"[MeSH] OR "clustered care" OR "sleep promotion" OR earplug*) | 2000 to present; English; adult 19+ | 276 |
Reasons for limits. The window begins in 2000 because the questionnaire most used to measure inpatient sleep, the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire, was published that year (Richards et al., 2000). English was required because no translation support was available. Adults of all ages were included rather than only those 65 and older, because a trial run limited to older adults returned too few intervention studies; applicability to older patients is judged at appraisal instead.
Decisions Made During the Search
Three decisions changed the strings between the first trial run and the searches logged above. First, a trial using only the subject heading for sleep returned more than 4,000 records in CINAHL, most about sleep disorders in the community. Requiring a hospital or inpatient term cut that to a workable number without losing any of the studies already known from the problem pitch.
Second, the phrase clustered care alone found very few records, because authors describe the same idea in many ways: bundled care, sleep protocols, quiet time and minimizing nighttime interruptions. The intervention line was widened with those synonyms and with earplugs, which appear in many sleep bundles.
Third, delirium was kept out of the search strings even though several retained studies measure it. Including it pulled in hundreds of delirium studies with no sleep component. Delirium is instead used at screening, so that studies linking sleep with delirium are kept when they appear under the sleep terms.
I also hand-checked the citations at the back of the Cochrane review that survived screening. That step added no new studies, which suggests the database strings captured the main literature for this question.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Included: studies of adult hospital inpatients in intensive care or ward settings; studies describing sources of overnight disruption, testing a non-drug sleep intervention, validating a sleep measure for inpatients, or examining links between inpatient sleep and delirium; primary research, systematic reviews and instrument development studies.
Excluded: pediatric and neonatal populations; studies of sleep medications only; studies in outpatient, home or nursing home settings; commentaries, editorials and conference abstracts; studies of shift workers' sleep rather than patients' sleep.
Screening Flow
The flow below follows the stages of a PRISMA diagram (Page et al., 2021).
Table 3
Records Through Each Stage of Screening
| Stage | Number | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Records found | 594 | CINAHL 318; PubMed 276 |
| Duplicates removed | 171 | 423 remaining |
| Excluded on title and abstract | 381 | Wrong population or setting 164; sleep medication only 77; not about patient sleep 96; commentary or abstract only 44 |
| Full texts read | 42 | |
| Excluded at full text | 33 | Intervention not described in enough detail 11; no sleep or delirium outcome 9; pediatric or mixed ages with no adult results 5; setting outside hospital 4; superseded by a later review 4 |
| Retained | 9 | Described in the Week 4 literature review |
Most retained intervention studies come from intensive care units, which is a limitation to carry into the review: evidence for a general medical unit will partly be borrowed from a more intensive setting.
References
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Richards, K. C., O'Sullivan, P. S., & Phillips, R. L. (2000). Measurement of sleep in critically ill patients. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 8(2), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.8.2.131
Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Asking the clinical question: A key step in evidence-based practice. American Journal of Nursing, 110(3), 58-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000368959.11129.79
The Walden NURS 4300 Week 3 instructions
The third NURS 4300 week typically asks for a documented search strategy for your capstone question. You map terms, record searches exactly, explain decisions, state inclusion and exclusion criteria and show the screening flow. Faculty check reproducibility by imagining a rerun. Cite search guidance in APA 7. Most BSN capstones search at least CINAHL and PubMed. A PRISMA-style flow diagram may be required or optional. Evidence from the last five to seven years is typical, with older landmark studies justified. NURS 4300 faculty want each string copied exactly, each database named with its limits and date, and screening counts given at every stage. State inclusion and exclusion criteria plainly.
How the NURS 4300 Week 3 example is put together
Three pages, much of it tabular. A term map opens the body: each PICOT element in one row, with the CINAHL subject heading, the MeSH term used in PubMed, and a column of free-text synonyms such as sleep disruption, nighttime interruption and clustered care. A second table lists the searches as run, one line per database, showing the Boolean string, the limits applied and the date each search was performed. Limits cover publication window, English language and adult populations, and each carries a one-sentence reason. Inclusion and exclusion criteria follow as two short lists. A flow diagram in the familiar PRISMA shape records how many records were found, removed as duplicates, screened by title and abstract, read in full, and retained, with reasons given for full-text exclusions.
Where the marks sit in the NURS 4300 Week 3 rubric
Reproducibility is where most search-strategy credit sits, and graders check it by imagining a rerun. Strings written as prose summaries, or searches reported without their limits, cannot be repeated and usually lose that row whole. Database choice carries a smaller weight, and leaving CINAHL out of a nursing search is a gap faculty spot quickly. Pairing subject headings with keywords signals search competence, and several rubrics name it outright. Screening transparency earns the next portion, rewarded when exclusion reasons appear and reduced when a large retrieval shrinks to a few studies with no account of how. Alignment with the Week 2 question is checked quickly, element against term. The gap paragraph reaches beyond most rubrics but prepares the synthesis, and formatting accounts for the small remainder.
NURS 4300 Week 3 help from the desk
Search strategies lose the most when strings are summarized in prose. Record them exactly. Another common gap is missing limits or dates. Add them. Writers also include studies from very different settings without comment. Explain the decision. Avoid searching one database only. Use subject headings and keywords. Show numbers at each screening stage. Close with the list of studies to review. Writers also forget to record searches that returned nothing useful, which still show method. Keep them in the log. Another frequent slip is criteria applied without saying so. State why each excluded study failed. Check that totals add up across screening stages. Keep the term map in a table.
Get a NURS 4300 Week 3 example written to your instructions
Include the search instructions and rubric with your final PICOT question, plus the databases your library provides. The desk builds a custom search strategy around that question, term map and flow diagram included, and the first one is free with a 24-48h turnaround. Counts in the diagram belong to the sample's own run; a rerun of yours will produce its own.
More NURS 4300 papers and BSN samples
- NURS 4300 Week 1: Capstone Problem Pitch
- NURS 4300 Week 2: Capstone PICOT Question
- NURS 4300 Week 4: Capstone Literature Review
- NURS 4300 Week 5: Capstone Evidence Synthesis
- NURS 4300 Week 6: Practice Change Proposal
- NURS 4300 Week 7: Implementation Plan
- NURS 4300 Week 8: Evaluation Plan
- NURS 4300 Week 9: Project Manuscript
- NURS 4300 Week 10: Staff Presentation
- NURS 4300 Week 11: Outcomes Reflection
- NURS 3021 Week 3: Change Agent Goal Statement
- NURS 4212 Week 3: Community Demographics Section
- NURS 3025 Week 3: Findings Language Post
- NURS 4151 Week 3: PICOT Question
NURS 4300 Week 3 questions, answered
Which databases does a BSN capstone search need?
Whatever the prompt names, and most name at least two. CINAHL is the core nursing index, PubMed covers the broader biomedical literature through MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library holds systematic reviews. The sample searches all three because each surfaced studies the others missed. Your library's access decides the final list, and the strategy should state which databases were unavailable rather than silently skipping them.
Is a PRISMA flow diagram required?
Many capstone rubrics ask for one, and even where it is optional it summarizes screening better than a paragraph can. The PRISMA shape was designed for systematic reviews, so a capstone search borrows its format without claiming to be a systematic review. The sample labels its diagram as adapted for that reason, which keeps the document accurate about what kind of search it reports.
How recent should the evidence be?
Most BSN rubrics set a publication window, and the prompt's figure governs. The sample applies its limit consistently and admits one older landmark study by name, justifying its place in a single line. Applying a window unevenly, or dropping it when results run thin, is a pattern instructors look for. Widening the window openly is always better than bending it quietly.
Where can I find a free NURS 4300 Week 3 sample paper?
The overnight care search strategy is on this page with the term map, searches as run, decisions, criteria and the screening flow.
Which terms appear in the NURS 4300 Week 3 term map?
Keywords and subject headings such as sleep deprivation and clustered care in CINAHL and PubMed.