What a NURS 3025 Week 5 cardiopulmonary documentation example contains: one composite patient's heart and lung findings, auscultation sites named, sounds in standard terms, and vital signs placed beside them. Searches like "nurs 3025 week 5 assignment example", "nurs3025 week 5 sample" and "nurs 3025 week 5 example" land here.
What a finished NURS 3025 Week 5 cardiopulmonary documentation looks like
The document runs to three pages with two parallel systems sections. Subjective data comes first and stays brief: the cough's onset and character, sputum as the patient describes it, exertional breathlessness reported against a familiar activity, and denials of chest pain or palpitations. The respiratory section follows inspection, palpation, percussion and auscultation in that order, with respiratory rate, effort, chest shape and the location of each abnormal sound given by lobe and side. The cardiac section records rhythm, the sites auscultated, heart sounds, and any extra sounds or murmurs described by timing and location. Peripheral findings such as capillary refill, edema and pulses appear in a short table graded on the scale the prompt specifies. Oxygen saturation is written together with its measuring conditions, room air or supplemental oxygen.
How a NURS 3025 Week 5 example is structured
Two systems share one document because their findings explain each other, and the layout keeps them parallel without merging them. Each system section follows the same examination sequence, which lets a reader locate a percussion note or a heart sound without scanning. Abnormal findings are placed on a map the reader already carries, lobe and side for lung sounds, auscultation area and cardiac cycle timing for heart sounds, so no finding floats without an address. The peripheral table exists because edema grades and pulse strengths are easier to compare across visits in rows than in sentences. Vital signs are not collected in a separate box at the top; each sits in the section it bears on, respiratory rate with the lungs, apical rate with the heart. An assessment line closes each section and speaks only to what the findings indicate.
Two systems, one sequence
Inspection, palpation, percussion and auscultation run in the same order in both sections, so a reader moving between heart and lungs never has to reorient.
Every sound given an address
Lung sounds are placed by lobe and side; heart sounds by auscultation area and timing in the cardiac cycle. A sound without a location cannot be rechecked.
Standard terms in place of impressions
Adventitious sounds carry their accepted names rather than words like 'junky' or 'wet', which mean something different to every nurse who reads them.
Peripheral findings in rows
Capillary refill, edema and pulses sit in a small table on the scale the prompt names, which makes a later comparison a matter of reading across.
Vitals where they bear
Respiratory rate and saturation sit with the lungs, apical rate and rhythm with the heart. Saturation always carries the air or oxygen conditions it was taken under.
Where marks go in NURS 3025 Week 5
Cardiopulmonary rubrics lean on terminology more than any earlier week, since sound is the main evidence and only standard vocabulary transmits it. An adventitious sound given the wrong name, or a lay word in place of a term, is the most common deduction, and it tends to recur across both sections. Localization is scored close behind; 'crackles heard' without lobe and side leaves the finding unusable. Examination sequence is read as evidence of a systematic exam, so auscultation documented before inspection costs points even when every finding is right. Many sections mark the placement of vital signs and whether saturation includes its conditions. The assessment lines are checked for overreach, and a diagnosis such as pneumonia or heart failure appearing in a nursing assessment of this kind is typically marked as unsupported.
Get a NURS 3025 Week 5 example written to your instructions
Attach the Week 5 prompt and its rubric, plus the case details your section provides, whether a simulated patient's findings or a scenario summary. The record comes back with both systems documented in examination order, every sound located and named. Your first sample is free of charge and lands in 24-48 hours. Peripheral grading scales follow whatever your section uses.
NURS 3025 Week 5 questions, answered
Should heart and lungs be written as one section or two?
The example uses two parallel sections because the rubrics it was built against score each system on its own line, and merging them makes it harder for a grader to find either. Some prompts ask for a single cardiopulmonary narrative, and where they do, the same examination order and localization still apply inside one heading. The prompt's own template settles it.
Does the example include normal values for vital signs?
No. The record documents what was measured on its composite patient, each value with its unit and conditions, and it does not print reference ranges beside them. Ranges belong to the course text and to facility policy, not to a sample. What the example shows is the documentation habit: a measurement recorded completely enough that any reader can interpret it against the standard they use.
Can I send findings from a simulation I completed?
Yes. Simulation findings are exactly what many sections build this week around, and they contain no patient data. Send the case summary as the simulation presented it, and those findings become the sample's findings. Anything drawn from a patient you actually cared for is a different matter and stays out, since a sample is built on composites and simulations only.