In NURS 3025 Week 1, a documentation exercise example is one short intake record on a composite adult, organized by a named assessment framework, subjective and objective data held apart. Searches like "nurs 3025 week 1 assignment example", "nurs3025 week 1 sample" and "nurs 3025 week 1 example" land here.
What a finished NURS 3025 Week 1 documentation exercise looks like
Roughly two pages. A single opening line names the framework the record follows, Gordon's functional health patterns, and says why a pattern-based frame suits an intake where the person arrives well rather than with one complaint. The body splits into two labeled blocks. The subjective block carries what the composite patient reported, each item attributed with 'reports' or 'states' and quoted where the exact words matter. The objective block carries what was seen, measured or heard: vital signs with their units and the position they were taken in, height and weight, general appearance described rather than judged. A final short paragraph notes two items the author could not assess in this encounter and says so plainly instead of leaving the heading empty. No nursing diagnosis appears.
How a NURS 3025 Week 1 example is structured
The order follows the framework rather than the author's memory of the visit, which is the whole reason a framework is named at the top. Placing subjective data before objective data mirrors how the encounter ran, and it lets a reader check each measured finding against the complaint or its absence. Labels inside the blocks repeat the pattern names exactly, so an instructor holding the framework can match headings one to one. Attribution verbs do quiet work: 'reports' marks a claim the nurse did not witness, while a plain declarative sentence is reserved for what the nurse saw or measured. The deferred items sit last because they describe the limits of the record, not the patient. Keeping any interpretation out of the document is deliberate, since the first graded question in this course is whether the author can stop at the evidence.
Framework named in line one
Gordon's functional health patterns frame the record, with one sentence on why a pattern view fits a well-person intake better than a single-complaint format.
Two blocks, clearly labeled
Subjective and objective data never share a paragraph. A reader can cover one block and still read the other without losing a finding.
Verbs that mark the source
'Reports' and 'states' flag the patient's words; plain statements carry what was observed. The difference tells a reader who witnessed each item.
Measurements carried whole
Each vital sign appears with its unit, the side or position used, and the device where it matters. A bare number is treated as half a finding.
Limits stated, not hidden
Two items the encounter could not reach are listed with the reason. A blank would look like something forgotten; the stated reason shows the gap was known.
Where marks go in NURS 3025 Week 1
Early documentation rubrics in this course tend to split their weight between organization, accuracy of terms and completeness, and each shows on the page. Organization is visible in the two labeled blocks and the framework headings. Terminology is read line by line, and lay words such as 'looks fine' or 'normal' standing alone cost points because they record a conclusion instead of what was seen. Completeness is judged against the framework the author chose, so naming eleven patterns and then documenting six invites the loss. A smaller row usually covers the professional register itself, where abbreviations common on a unit but absent from an approved list are marked as errors. The heaviest single penalty on this first exercise, in most sections, falls on interpretation leaking into the objective block.
Get a NURS 3025 Week 1 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 1 prompt, the rubric and the framework your section names, whether Gordon's patterns, a head-to-toe outline or a body-systems template. The exercise comes back on a composite intake patient in that frame, both data blocks filled, ready to set beside your own encounter. The first custom sample costs nothing and arrives within 24-48 hours.
NURS 3025 Week 1 questions, answered
Does the framework have to be Gordon's patterns?
No. The example uses Gordon's functional health patterns because a pattern view fits a visit with no single presenting problem, but many sections name a head-to-toe outline or a body-systems template instead. Whatever the prompt names governs the headings. What carries over between frameworks is the split between reported and observed data, which every version of this exercise grades.
Is the patient in the example a real person?
No. The patient is a composite assembled for the example, and every finding in the record belongs to that composite rather than to anyone treated anywhere. Charts from your own unit stay out of it entirely, since protected health information has no place in a sample. Where the prompt calls for a real encounter, that record is yours to make, and the sample shows only its shape.
Why would 'normal' cost points in a first exercise?
Because the word reports a verdict and hides the observation behind it. A reader cannot tell whether 'lungs normal' means clear sounds heard in every field or a quick listen at two sites. The example replaces each such summary with what was actually observed, a habit every later week of the course depends on and the one early rubrics check first.