Baseline, target, method and date are fixed in the Week 9 throughput improvement charter example, whose MMHA 6700 aim ties the discharge redesign to a median hour. Searches like "mmha 6700 week 9 assignment example", "mmha6700 week 9 sample" and "mmha 6700 week 9 example" land here.
What a finished MMHA 6700 Week 9 throughput improvement charter looks like
Three pages in the charter layout most improvement teams use, followed by a one-page measures appendix. Its problem statement points back to the earlier fishbone and value stream work in two sentences. The aim follows in one sentence with its baseline, target and deadline. Scope is fenced explicitly: four medical-surgical units in, the intensive care and maternity units out, patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities tracked but excluded from the target. The method section names three changes, an expected discharge date set within a day of admission, rounds that see likely discharges first, and medications delivered to the bedside before departure, and commits to testing each on one unit before spreading. Team roles, a sponsor with budget authority and a meeting cadence complete the page. The appendix defines each measure precisely.
How a MMHA 6700 Week 9 example is structured
The problem statement is short because two earlier documents already carry the evidence, and repeating it would bury the commitment the charter exists to make. The aim sits immediately after, in a single sentence, so a sponsor reading one line knows what will be judged and when. Scope comes next and is drawn in both directions, since a charter silent about exclusions invites the project to absorb every unit that asks. Each change in the method section traces to a bone of the fishbone, which lets a reader see why these three and not others. Testing on one unit first is written as a commitment, not an aspiration. The sponsor is named by role and authority, because a charter without someone able to fund it is a wish list. Measures move to an appendix so definitions can be precise without interrupting the argument.
The aim in one sentence
An illustrative baseline of 3:30 pm, a target of 1:00 pm, four units, six months. Nothing else in the charter matters if this line is vague.
A fence with two sides
Intensive care and maternity are out; skilled nursing discharges are tracked but excluded from the target. Exclusions are stated, not implied.
Three changes traced to causes
Expected discharge dates, discharge-first rounds and bedside medication delivery each answer a bone of the earlier fishbone.
One unit before four
Every change is tested on a single unit before spread. The charter writes that sequence as a commitment.
A sponsor who can fund it
The sponsor is named by role and budget authority. A charter no one can pay for stays a document.
Definitions kept in an appendix
Median discharge hour, the share of discharges before noon and emergency boarding hours are defined where the precision will not crowd the page.
Where marks go in MMHA 6700 Week 9
Charters are judged on whether each element commits to something checkable. An aim promising improved throughput without a baseline, a number and a date leaves the evaluation criterion with nothing to measure against, and most rubrics count that as no aim at all rather than a weak one. Scope carries more weight than drafts assume, because a project without boundaries cannot be staffed or finished. The method section is credited when each change answers a documented cause; changes chosen for popularity lose alignment points. Measure definitions are read for precision, so a median discharge hour that never says whether it counts the order or the departure invites a comment. Sponsor and team roles count for less, typically lost when a committee is named where a single accountable role belongs. Format follows the section's template exactly.
Get a MMHA 6700 Week 9 example written to your instructions
With the rubric, include the section's charter template if it has one and the problem your earlier weeks identified; the charter you get back commits to your numbers and dates. No payment is asked for the first, delivered in 24 to 48 hours. Its baseline hour is illustrative, chosen for the example rather than taken from any unit's records.
MMHA 6700 Week 9 questions, answered
How specific must the aim be?
Specific enough to fail. The example's aim names the measure, the units covered, an illustrative baseline, a target and a deadline, all within a single sentence. Drop any one of those and the aim cannot be judged when the deadline arrives, which is why rubrics treat vagueness here as an omission. If your section requires a particular aim format, that format governs the wording but not the precision.
Why exclude skilled nursing discharges from the target?
Because their timing depends heavily on a receiving facility's acceptance and transport, which the hospital's own redesign cannot control. The example still tracks them so their effect stays visible, but judging the project on them would blur what the three changes achieved. Stating the exclusion openly lets a reader disagree with it, which is better than leaving the number contaminated.
Is a charter the same as the improvement plan?
No. A charter commits a team to an aim, a scope, a method and a sponsor; the full improvement plan, usually due at the end of the course, adds analysis, projections, implementation detail and a sustain plan. The example keeps the charter to three pages so each commitment is visible, and later weeks build the projection and the complete plan on it.