| Course | MMHA 6700 Healthcare Operations |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 8 |
| Paper type | Root cause analysis paper |
| Length | About 1,030 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MMHA 6700 Week 8
The Ride Was Never the Problem: A Fishbone and Five Whys Analysis of Late Discharges That Ends at the Morning Rounding Order
Student Name
Walden University
MMHA 6700: Healthcare Operations
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
The Ride Was Never the Problem: A Fishbone and Five Whys Analysis of Late Discharges That Ends at the Morning Rounding Order
The Belief Being Tested
Ask anyone on the 5 West ward at Linden Ford, the invented hospital behind this term's operations work, why patients go home late, and they usually explain late discharges in one word: rides. Families arrive after work, the explanation goes, so patients leave in the late afternoon. The Week 7 value stream map found that the wait for a family ride is real, a median of 50 minutes, but that it is the fifth of six waits in sequence. This analysis uses a fishbone diagram to collect every cause staff could name, then follows the strongest causal chain with five whys, to test whether rides drive late discharges or are themselves an effect of something earlier.
Building the Fishbone
A fishbone, or cause-and-effect, diagram groups possible causes of a problem under headings, so a team considers more than the most obvious one. The problem placed at the head was: median time from medical readiness to leaving is 5 hours 50 minutes. A one-hour session with two hospitalists, three bedside nurses, the unit's case manager, one pharmacist and the transport supervisor produced the causes in Table 1, grouped under six headings commonly used in health care.
Table 1
Fishbone Causes by Category
| Category | Causes named |
|---|---|
| People | Hospitalists carry 16 to 18 patients; nurses learn of discharge orders late; case manager covers two units |
| Methods | Hospitalists round by room number; discharge order written after all rounds; medication reconciliation done at the end |
| Materials | Prescriptions not filled until order written; paper checklist duplicates electronic one |
| Machines and systems | No alert to nurse when discharge order is signed; no automatic cleaning request |
| Environment | Pharmacy window two floors away; families' work schedules |
| Measurement | Discharge time measured from order, not readiness; no one tracks time from readiness |
Twenty causes across six categories. Rides appear once, under environment, as families' work schedules.
Five Whys on the Main Chain
The team then asked which causes, if removed, would shorten the wait the most. The value stream map showed the physician wait as the largest single delay, so the team traced it with five whys, asking why at each step until reaching a cause that could be changed.
The finding reverses the staff belief. Rides arrive late because the information families receive is late, and that information is late because of how morning rounds are ordered. Fix the rounding order and the call to the family can go out at 10:30 rather than 13:00.
Table 2
Five Whys From Late Departure
| Why? | Answer |
|---|---|
| 1. Why do patients leave in the late afternoon? | Because families are told the patient will be ready after lunch and arrive then |
| 2. Why are families told after lunch? | Because the discharge order is usually not written until after 12:00 |
| 3. Why is the order not written until after 12:00? | Because the hospitalist writes discharge orders after finishing rounds on all patients |
| 4. Why are discharge orders written after all rounds? | Because rounds follow room order, and ready patients are mixed among sick ones |
| 5. Why do rounds follow room order? | Because the hospitalist's patient list sorts by room, and no one flags likely discharges before rounds |
The chain ends at the rounding order. Rides are an effect: families come when they are told, and they are told after lunch because the order comes after lunch.
Checking the Chain
Five whys is easy to misuse. A critique of the method in health care warns that it tends to follow a single linear path, can stop at whatever cause the team already believes and may miss the several interacting causes most problems have (Card, 2017). The team guarded against those weaknesses in three ways.
First, they kept the fishbone's other causes in view. Late nurse notification and pharmacy filling remain real and will be addressed, but they come after the order is written, so they cannot explain why the order is late. Second, they checked the chain against data. In the 40 discharges mapped in Week 7, the 9 patients rounded on first, by chance of room order, left a median of two hours earlier than the others. Third, they asked whether families could come earlier if told earlier. The case manager called families for 10 planned discharges the day before; 8 could arrive before noon.
Studies of hospitals that set a goal of discharging patients before noon found that changing rounding and team routines moved discharges earlier (Wertheimer et al., 2014). Another analysis found that earlier discharge was associated with shorter length of stay for medical patients, though not for surgical patients, which suggests the benefit is real but not universal (Rajkomar et al., 2016).
Countermeasures
Table 3
Countermeasures Linked to Causes
| Cause | Countermeasure | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| No one flags likely discharges before rounds | Charge nurse and case manager flag likely discharges at 08:30 huddle | Unit nurse manager |
| Rounds follow room order | Hospitalists round on flagged patients first | Hospitalist medical director |
| Families told after lunch | Case manager calls family when patient is flagged, giving a target time | Case management lead |
| Nurses learn of orders late | Signed discharge order pages the nurse | Nursing informatics |
| Prescriptions filled after order | Planned discharges' prescriptions sent the evening before | Pharmacy |
The first three countermeasures address the main chain; the last two address secondary causes the fishbone surfaced.
Limits
The fishbone reflects the views of one session's participants. Five whys found one chain; others may contribute, especially for patients discharged to facilities. The comparison of patients rounded on first was not randomized; those patients may have been less complex. The session also lacked a family member's view, which might have added causes the staff do not see, such as unclear instructions about when to come.
Conclusion
The ride is real, but it is not the cause of late discharges on 5 West. It is the last link in a chain that begins with how morning rounds are ordered. The fishbone kept other causes visible, the five whys followed the main chain and the hospital's own data supported it. Changing the rounding order, and telling families earlier, attacks the chain at its start.
References
Card, A. J. (2017). The problem with '5 whys'. BMJ Quality and Safety, 26(8), 671-677. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005849
Rajkomar, A., Valencia, V., Novelero, M., Mourad, M., & Auerbach, A. (2016). The association between discharge before noon and length of stay in medical and surgical patients. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 11(12), 859-861. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2529
Wertheimer, B., Jacobs, R. E., Bailey, M., Holstein, S., Chatfield, S., Ohta, B., Horrocks, A., & Hochman, K. (2014). Discharge before noon: An achievable hospital goal. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 9(4), 210-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2154
Reading the MMHA 6700 Week 8 instructions
Root cause assignments ask you to move from a symptom to a cause you can change. State the problem precisely and any belief about its cause. Use a fishbone diagram to collect causes from people who do the work, grouped in categories. Then choose the strongest chain and follow it with five whys, stopping at a cause that can be acted on. Present each why so readers can challenge it. Test the chain against your own data and acknowledge the method's weaknesses, such as its linear path. Keep other fishbone causes in view and address them as secondary. Propose countermeasures linked to causes, each with an owner, and state the limits of the session that produced them.
Inside the MMHA 6700 Week 8 example
The paper opens with the staff belief about rides and the value stream map's evidence. A section describes the fishbone session and Table 1 lists twenty causes in six categories. Table 2 presents five whys from late departure to the rounding order. A paragraph explains how the finding reverses the belief. A checking section cites Card's critique and describes three safeguards: keeping other causes in view, comparing patients rounded on first and asking whether families could come earlier, then cites Wertheimer and colleagues and Rajkomar and colleagues. Table 3 links five countermeasures to causes and owners. Limits note the session's makeup and the nonrandom comparison. Each countermeasure names a department head who can make it happen.
MMHA 6700 Week 8 rubric: what earns full marks
Root cause papers are graded on reasoning. A fishbone that captures causes broadly, from people who do the work, earns the foundation. A five whys chain with each step explicit earns the core share. Testing the chain against data and acknowledging the method's weaknesses earns significant credit, because it shows the student did not stop at a convenient answer. Keeping secondary causes in view demonstrates balance. Countermeasures should map to causes and have owners. Limits should be candid. Tables should present the diagram and the chain clearly. A reference list in APA style, aligned with every in-text citation, completes the paper.
MMHA 6700 Week 8 help from the desk
Root cause papers often stop at the first plausible answer. Collect causes widely first, with a fishbone and a mixed group. Then follow one chain with five whys, writing each answer down. Ask whether your data support it. Remember that five whys can mislead if you stop at what you already believe. Keep the other causes on your list. Link each fix to a cause and give it an owner. If a delay at your organization seems to have an obvious cause, we can help you run the analysis and check whether the obvious answer holds. Invite a pharmacist and a transport lead to the fishbone session, since their causes rarely surface in nursing-only meetings.
Get a MMHA 6700 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Attach the rubric, say which effect the prompt asks the diagram to explain and whether five whys or another method is required, and a fishbone with its narrative follows. It costs nothing the first time and lands in 24-48h. The hundred late discharges were composed for the example, not pulled from any discharge log.
More MMHA 6700 papers and MHA samples
- MMHA 6700 Week 1: Hospital Operations Profile
- MMHA 6700 Week 2: Admission Process Map
- MMHA 6700 Week 3: Bed Utilization Post
- MMHA 6700 Week 4: ED Patient Flow Analysis
- MMHA 6700 Week 5: OR Block Schedule Review
- MMHA 6700 Week 6: Supply Par Level Analysis
- MMHA 6700 Week 7: Discharge Value Stream Map
- MMHA 6700 Week 9: Throughput Improvement Charter
- MMHA 6700 Week 10: Bed Capacity Payback Projection
- MMHA 6700 Week 11: Operations Improvement Plan
- MMHA 6601 Week 8: NASSS Complexity Assessment
- MMHA 6600 Week 8: Anticoagulant Registry Design
- MMHA 6540 Week 8: Payer ROI Brief
- MMHA 6530 Week 8: Scale-Up Evidence Critique
MMHA 6700 Week 8 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MMHA 6700 Week 8 sample paper?
The fishbone and five whys analysis is published here with all three tables.
What does the MMHA 6700 Week 8 analysis conclude about rides?
Rides are an effect: families come when told, and they are told after lunch because orders come after rounds.
Where does the five whys chain end?
At the morning rounding order, which follows room number with no flag for likely discharges.
How was the chain checked?
Patients rounded on first by chance left about two hours earlier, and most families could arrive before noon if called a day ahead.
What weakness of five whys does the paper address?
Its tendency to follow one linear path and stop at a favored cause, as Card warns.