Built on the donor pyramid, this fundraising plan for MBAX 6850 (Week 6) sets giving goals by donor level and pairs them with rules for asking ethically. Searches like "mbax 6850 week 6 assignment example", "mbax6850 week 6 sample" and "mbax 6850 week 6 example" land here.
What a finished MBAX 6850 Week 6 fundraising plan looks like
A one-paragraph goal leads the plan: raise individual giving from an illustrative $0.8 million to $1.0 million over two years. A pyramid figure follows, with many small annual donors at the base, a narrower band of mid-level donors, a small number of major donors near the top and planned gifts at the peak, each tier carrying an illustrative donor count and dollar target. Strategy sections take each tier in turn, naming the channel, the person responsible and the rough cost of raising a dollar at that level. Board giving has its own short section. The ethics section sets three rules: learners' stories are used only with written consent and a right to withdraw, restricted gifts are accepted only for work the organization already does, and gifts from sources that conflict with the mission are declined.
How a MBAX 6850 Week 6 example is structured
The goal comes first so every tier can be read against a number, and the number is modest because a plan that doubles giving overnight is not a plan. The pyramid organizes the middle of the document because it forces a question plans often skip, where the next dollar will come from, since moving donors up a tier usually costs less than finding new ones at the base. Tiers are presented bottom to top, matching how most donors enter. Board giving is separated because a board asking others to give without giving itself undermines every ask, and funders sometimes inquire about it. The ethics section closes the plan and runs as long as any tier. Its final position is deliberate: it governs everything above it, and a reader finishes the plan knowing what the organization will not do for money.
A modest two-year goal
Individual giving rises from an illustrative $0.8 million to $1.0 million, a target small enough that each tier's share can be defended.
The pyramid, bottom to top
Annual donors, mid-level donors, major donors and planned gifts are stacked with counts and targets, showing where the added money has to come from.
Who asks at each level
Each tier names a channel and a responsible person, from mailed appeals at the base to board-member visits near the top.
The board's own giving
A short section expects every director to give at a level personal to them, since an ask from a non-giving board rings hollow.
Three rules on asking
Consent before a learner's story is used, restricted gifts only for existing work, and declining money that conflicts with the mission close the plan.
Where marks go in MBAX 6850 Week 6
Plans collect the bulk of their marks where the pyramid meets arithmetic. A figure showing tiers without counts or targets decorates the plan; one where tier targets sum to the stated goal, with a responsible person beside each, shows planning. The ethics section weighs heavily, since the week pairs fundraising with the ethics of asking. Rules stated as values, such as a promise to respect learners, earn little; rules stated as procedures, written consent with a right to withdraw, earn the credit. Cost of fundraising is noticed when present and missed when absent, because a plan ignoring what each dollar costs to raise invites the overhead questions boards ask. Graders also flag inflated projections. A plan claiming a new major donor program will triple giving in a year reads as hope, not analysis.
Get a MBAX 6850 Week 6 example written to your instructions
Send the fundraising prompt and rubric, and include any giving history on file for the course; the plan's targets are set from it in 24 to 48 hours, first one free. Every donor tier, target and learner story was dreamed up along with the literacy organization itself, and none of it comes from a real campaign.
MBAX 6850 Week 6 questions, answered
What is the donor pyramid?
A common way of picturing an organization's donors: many people giving small amounts at the base, fewer giving larger amounts in the middle, and a handful of major and planned gifts at the top. Here it shows where added revenue must come from. It is a planning concept rather than a rule, and real donor files rarely match its shape exactly.
Why does a fundraising plan need an ethics section?
Because asking for money involves choices about how people are portrayed and what the organization accepts. The example sets rules on consent for learner stories, on restricted gifts and on declining conflicting donations. Many prompts in this week ask for ethical considerations explicitly, and procedures a reader could check tend to earn more than statements of values.
Should the plan include fundraising costs?
Yes, where the prompt allows. The example estimates the cost of raising a dollar at each tier in general terms, noting that mailed appeals at the base tend to cost more per dollar raised than a major gift conversation. Stating costs keeps the plan honest about net revenue, which is what the budget can actually spend.