| Course | INHE 3004 Legal and Ethical Issues in Integrative Health Care |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 8 |
| Paper type | Advertising audit |
| Length | About 630 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Integrative Health |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for INHE 3004 Week 8
Seven Sentences, Seven Legal Questions, Then the Ethical One: An Advertising Audit of a Wellness Clinic's Supplement Page
Student Name
Walden University
INHE 3004: Legal and Ethical Issues in Integrative Health Care
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Seven Sentences, Seven Legal Questions, Then the Ethical One: An Advertising Audit of a Wellness Clinic's Supplement Page
The Page
A composite wellness clinic sells a joint supplement it calls Joint Restore, and its product page carries seven promotional sentences. Dietary supplements in the United States fall under two federal regimes for their marketing: the Food and Drug Administration governs what a label may claim, and the Federal Trade Commission governs whether advertising is truthful and substantiated. This audit sorts each sentence by the rule it would have to satisfy, then asks which sentences should come down even where the rules would let them stay.
The Audit
Table 1
Each sentence on the page and the rule it must satisfy
| No. | Sentence | Type of claim | Governing rule | Legal status as written | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Joint Restore supports healthy joint function." | Structure/function | Allowed on supplements with the required disclaimer and FDA notification | Allowed if the disclaimer appears and the claim is substantiated | |
| 2 | "Relieves arthritis pain naturally." | Disease claim | Supplements may not claim to treat or relieve a disease | Not allowed for a supplement | |
| 3 | "Clinically proven to work in 7 days." | Efficacy claim with a stated level of proof | Advertising must be backed by competent and reliable scientific evidence, matching the claim | Allowed only if trials of this product show a 7-day effect | |
| 4 | "Over 10,000 happy customers." | Factual statement | Must be true | Allowed if accurate | |
| 5 | "Made in an FDA-registered facility." | Factual statement implying endorsement | Must not mislead; registration is not approval | Literally true but likely misleading | |
| 6 | "Doctor recommended." | Endorsement claim | Endorsements must reflect real, typical opinions and disclose connections | Allowed only with a documented basis | |
| 7 | "Safe for everyone, with no side effects." | Safety claim | Must be substantiated and not misleading | Unsupported absolute claim | |
The page and product are composites written for this audit; legal status is a summary, not legal advice.
The first sentence is the kind of claim supplement makers are permitted to make: it describes a role in normal body function, and federal rules allow it if the label carries a disclaimer stating that the claim has not been evaluated by the FDA and the product is not meant for diagnosing, treating, curing or preventing disease (21 C.F.R. § 101.93). The second sentence crosses into a disease claim, since arthritis is a disease, and the same regulation treats claims to relieve a disease as drug claims that a supplement may not make.
Substantiation and Implied Claims
The FTC's guidance on health products requires that the evidence behind a health claim be competent and reliable science, generally well-controlled studies, and that the evidence match the claim actually made, including any implied claims (Federal Trade Commission [FTC], 2022). "Clinically proven to work in 7 days" therefore needs trials of this formula showing a benefit within seven days; studies of a single ingredient at a different dose would not do. Sentence 5 shows how an implied claim works: FDA registers facilities but does not approve supplements before they are sold, so "FDA-registered" can lead a reader to infer an approval that does not exist.
Which Sentences Should Come Down Anyway
Two sentences should be removed even if a lawyer found a way to defend them. Sentence 5 trades on a reader's confusion about the FDA's role, and a clinic that offers health care should not benefit from that confusion. Sentence 7 claims a certainty about safety that no product has; a client with kidney disease or on a blood thinner would be badly served by believing it. Respect for clients' autonomy requires that the information they rely on be accurate enough for a real choice (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019), and both sentences fail that test whatever their legal status.
References
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Federal Trade Commission. (2022). Health products compliance guidance. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/health-products-compliance-guidance
Statements made for dietary supplements, 21 C.F.R. § 101.93 (2024).
Reading the INHE 3004 Week 8 instructions
Advertising audit assignments ask students to evaluate the claims on a real or composite marketing page for a health product or service. Prompts typically ask students to classify each claim, identify the rule that governs it, judge its legal status and then consider whether it is ethically acceptable. Instructors look for correct classification under federal supplement labeling rules and advertising substantiation standards, and for attention to implied claims. Audits that treat the page as a whole rather than sentence by sentence, or that stop at legality, usually trail audits that classify each sentence and then ask the ethical question. Some prompts ask students to find a real page and anonymize it. A few prompts add a third regime, state consumer protection law.
How the INHE 3004 Week 8 example is put together
The audit introduces the composite page and the two federal regimes that govern supplement marketing. A table lists seven sentences with the type of claim, the governing rule and the legal status, with a note that the status is a summary. A paragraph explains the structure/function and disease-claim distinction, citing the federal regulation. A section explains substantiation and implied claims using the FTC's guidance. A final section argues that two sentences should come down regardless of legality, grounding the argument in respect for clients' informed choices. The page and product are composites, so no real company is accused. Each sentence is quoted exactly as the page would show it. The ethical section names exactly two sentences to remove.
Where the marks sit in the INHE 3004 Week 8 rubric
Instructors generally reward correct classification, and sorting each sentence by claim type and rule secures much of the grade. Distinguishing structure/function claims from disease claims, with the regulation cited, earns substantial credit. Explaining how a literally true statement can mislead shows understanding of implied claims. The ethical section, which removes sentences the law might allow, is often where the strongest audits stand out because it shows the student does not equate legal with acceptable. Accurate citations for the regulation, the FTC guidance and the principles text complete the audit. Quoting each sentence exactly, and labeling the page as a composite, keeps the audit fair and checkable.
INHE 3004 Week 8 help from the desk
Copy each sentence exactly and number it. For each, decide whether it describes a body function, claims to treat a disease, states a level of proof, gives a fact or endorses. Identify the rule that applies and whether the sentence meets it. Look for implied meanings, especially around the FDA. Then ask, separately, which sentences a responsible clinic should remove anyway. If supplement labeling rules are new to you, a sample audit of a page you choose can show the method. Number every sentence so your table and prose can refer to them. Keep legal status and ethical judgment in separate columns or sections.
Get a INHE 3004 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Paste in the full wording of the advertisement your section assigned, then add the prompt and rubric. The audit arrives in 24-48h, and a first one is not billed. The sorting is an academic reading of published rules and reaches no finding about any actual seller, so material from a business you are connected to should stay out of it.
More INHE 3004 papers and BS in Integrative Health samples
- INHE 3004 Week 1: Law Versus Ethics Post
- INHE 3004 Week 2: Autonomy Ethics Memo
- INHE 3004 Week 3: Scope Brief
- INHE 3004 Week 4: Statute Summary
- INHE 3004 Week 5: Case Analysis
- INHE 3004 Week 6: Continue Care Post
- INHE 3004 Week 7: Consent Form Review
- INHE 3004 Week 9: Privacy Policy Critique
- INHE 3004 Week 10: Peer Rebuttal
- INHE 3004 Week 11: Closing Reflection
- INHE 3003 Week 8: Article Appraisal
- INHE 4001 Week 8: Recommendation Memo
- INHE 3002 Week 8: Regulation Brief
- INHE 4009 Week 8: Source Critique
INHE 3004 Week 8 questions, answered
Where can I find a free INHE 3004 Week 8 sample paper?
The supplement page audit appears in full on this page.
What is a structure/function claim?
A claim about a nutrient's role in normal body function, allowed on supplements with a required disclaimer.
Why is "relieves arthritis pain" not allowed?
It is a disease claim, which supplements may not make.
What is wrong with "made in an FDA-registered facility"?
It is true but implies FDA approval, which supplements do not receive before sale.
Which sentences should come down regardless of legality?
The FDA-registration line and the claim of no side effects for everyone.