INHE 3004 Week 9 Privacy Policy Critique Example

Legal and Ethical Issues in Integrative Health Care Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

A cash-pay wellness center's privacy policy declares that HIPAA does not apply because the center does not bill insurance, then shares intake histories with a marketing vendor, and this INHE 3004 Week 9 policy critique example argues that the policy answers a legal question while leaving the ethical one untouched. The HIPAA statement may be accurate, since the rule covers providers who conduct certain electronic transactions. But the FTC's 2023 order against BetterHelp shows that sharing health information for advertising can still be unlawful, and the policy never says what is shared or how clients can refuse. Walden INHE 3004 asks critics to look for omissions, and this one finds three. BS in Integrative Health readers will see confidentiality grounded in the relationship, not only the statute.

CourseINHE 3004 Legal and Ethical Issues in Integrative Health Care
WeekWeek 9
Paper typePolicy critique
LengthAbout 530 words, 4 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramBS in Integrative Health
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for INHE 3004 Week 9

1

Answering the Legal Question and Missing the Ethical One: A Critique of a Cash-Pay Wellness Center's Privacy Policy That Says HIPAA Does Not Apply

Student Name

Walden University

INHE 3004: Legal and Ethical Issues in Integrative Health Care

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the critique's thesis, that the policy may be legally accurate and still fail clients.
2

Answering the Legal Question and Missing the Ethical One: A Critique of a Cash-Pay Wellness Center's Privacy Policy That Says HIPAA Does Not Apply

The Policy

A composite cash-pay wellness center offering acupuncture, massage and nutrition coaching publishes a privacy policy with two key sentences. The first states: "Because we do not bill insurance, we are not subject to HIPAA." The second states that intake information, including health history, may be shared with "trusted partners," and a later clause names a marketing vendor that uses it to "personalize offers." This critique asks what the policy gets right, what it omits and why the omissions matter.

What this page is doingQuoting the policy's two key sentences first anchors the critique in the text.
3

What the Policy Gets Right

The first sentence may well be accurate. Only covered entities fall under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, and a health care provider counts as one when it transmits health information electronically in connection with certain standard transactions, such as billing a health plan (45 C.F.R. § 160.103). A provider that takes only cash and never conducts those transactions electronically may fall outside the definition. The center's legal advisers may have been right to say HIPAA does not reach it.

What the Policy Omits

The policy treats the HIPAA question as if it settled the privacy question, and it does not. Three omissions stand out.

First, other law still applies. The Federal Trade Commission treats sharing consumers' health information for advertising, contrary to what consumers were told, as an unfair or deceptive practice. In 2023 it finalized an order against the online counseling service BetterHelp, which had shared consumers' health information with advertising platforms after promising to keep it private; the order required payment of $7.8 million and banned the company from sharing health information for advertising (Federal Trade Commission [FTC], 2023). A center that is not a HIPAA covered entity is still subject to the FTC Act.

Second, the policy does not say what "trusted partners" receive or how clients can refuse. A client reading it cannot tell whether their health history goes to the marketing vendor, in what form, or whether they can opt out.

Third, the policy never addresses what clients expect. People who describe their health history to a practitioner generally expect it to stay within their care, whether or not a federal rule says so.

The Ethical Gap

Confidentiality in health care rests on more than law. Clients disclose sensitive information because they trust it will be used for their care, and that trust is part of what makes care possible. Ethical accounts of confidentiality treat a practitioner's duty to protect such information as grounded in respect for persons and in the trust the relationship depends on, not only in statute (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019). A policy that shares intake histories with a marketing vendor, under a vague phrase, uses clients' trust for a purpose they did not agree to, even if no law forbids it.

What this page is doingPlacing the duty of confidentiality in the relationship, not the statute, is where the critique moves from legal to ethical.
4

Recommendation

The center should keep its accurate statement about HIPAA but add plain-language answers to three questions: what information is shared, with whom, and how a client can refuse. Better still, it should stop sharing health histories for marketing entirely, since the ethical cost far exceeds any marketing benefit.

References

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Definitions, 45 C.F.R. § 160.103 (2024).

Federal Trade Commission. (2023). FTC to ban BetterHelp from revealing consumers' data, including sensitive mental health information, to Facebook and others for targeted advertising. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/03/ftc-ban-betterhelp-revealing-consumers-data-including-sensitive-mental-health-information-facebook

INHE 3004 Week 9 instructions, in plain terms

Policy critique assignments ask students to evaluate a clinic or business policy against legal requirements and ethical standards. Prompts often supply a privacy, consent or advertising policy and ask what it gets right, what it omits and how it should change. Instructors look for accurate legal analysis, attention to what the policy fails to say, and an ethical argument that goes beyond compliance. Critiques that only check the policy's stated legal claim, or that object on ethical grounds without understanding the law, generally earn less credit than critiques that do both and recommend specific changes. Some prompts ask students to rewrite the policy as part of the critique.

Inside the INHE 3004 Week 9 example

The critique quotes the policy's two key sentences. A section explains why the HIPAA statement may be accurate, citing the regulatory definition of a covered entity. A section names three omissions: other law, including FTC enforcement illustrated by the BetterHelp order; the vagueness of "trusted partners" and the absence of an opt-out; and silence about client expectations. A section grounds confidentiality in respect for persons and trust, citing an ethics text. A recommendation keeps the accurate HIPAA statement, adds plain answers about sharing and urges ending marketing use of health histories. The policy is a composite written for the course, and its two key sentences are quoted so the critique has a fixed target. The enforcement example names the company and the year. Its recommendation keeps what is accurate and adds what is missing.

Where the marks sit in the INHE 3004 Week 9 rubric

Instructors generally reward accurate legal analysis, and explaining when HIPAA applies, with the regulation cited, secures a solid share. Identifying what the policy omits earns substantial credit, since that is where a policy usually fails clients. Using a real enforcement action to show that other law applies demonstrates research beyond the obvious statute. The ethical section, which grounds confidentiality in the relationship rather than the law, is often what distinguishes the strongest critiques. Specific, practical recommendations complete the paper, with accurate citations for the regulation, the FTC action and the ethics text. Using a named, dated enforcement action gives the legal point a verifiable anchor.

INHE 3004 Week 9 help from the desk

Start by testing the policy's own legal claims against the regulation it names. Then look for other laws and enforcement that might apply. List what a client would want to know that the policy does not say. Ask what clients expect when they share health information, apart from any law. Recommend specific changes in plain language. If privacy law feels hard to apply, a sample critique of a policy you provide can walk through it. Quote the policy's exact words before you criticize them. Keep legal and ethical points in separate sections so readers can follow both.

Get a INHE 3004 Week 9 example written to your instructions

A policy critique needs the policy, so include the document your section set, or a pasted copy, when the prompt and rubric go over. Turnaround is 24-48h, with a first critique at no cost. Its argument concerns one document as coursework and offers no opinion on a clinic's legal standing; any policy from your own employer can stay with you.

More INHE 3004 papers and BS in Integrative Health samples

INHE 3004 Week 9 questions, answered

Where can I find a free INHE 3004 Week 9 sample paper?

You can read the whole privacy policy critique on this page.

Does HIPAA apply to a cash-only wellness center?

Possibly not; HIPAA covers providers who conduct certain standard transactions electronically, such as billing insurance.

Can sharing health data for marketing still be unlawful?

Yes. The FTC's 2023 BetterHelp order shows the FTC Act can apply even outside HIPAA.

What does the policy omit?

Other applicable law, what "trusted partners" receive and how clients can refuse, and client expectations.

What does the critique recommend?

Plain answers about sharing and an end to using health histories for marketing.