| Course | HLTH 4200 Principles of Epidemiology |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 11 |
| Paper type | Applied epidemiology paper |
| Length | About 1,060 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Public Health |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 4200 Week 11
Falls Bringing Harmon County Residents Aged 65 and Older to the Emergency Department, 2019 and 2024: An Applied Epidemiology Paper in Which Every Number Carries Its Numerator, Denominator and Year
Student Name
Walden University
HLTH 4200: Principles of Epidemiology
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Falls Bringing Harmon County Residents Aged 65 and Older to the Emergency Department, 2019 and 2024: An Applied Epidemiology Paper in Which Every Number Carries Its Numerator, Denominator and Year
Background
Falls cause more injuries to older Americans than any other mechanism. In 2014, 28.7% of adults aged 65 and older said they had fallen during the previous 12 months, an estimated 29.0 million falls, and about 2.8 million older adults were treated in emergency departments for fall injuries (Bergen et al., 2016). A later national analysis followed self-reported falls and fall injuries among older adults from 2012 to 2018 (Moreland et al., 2020). This paper applies the methods of the course to one composite county, Harmon County, describing emergency visits for falls by its older residents in 2019 and 2024, and to ask whether the rate changed.
Case Definition
Each case is one emergency department visit made by a Harmon County resident aged 65 or older at the time of the visit, in calendar year 2019 or 2024, with an injury diagnosis and an external cause code indicating a fall (ICD-10-CM codes W00 to W19). Visits are counted, not people; a person who fell twice and visited twice counts twice. Visits resulting in hospital admission are included. Visits by nonresidents are excluded, even if they occurred in the county, so that the numerator matches a resident population denominator.
Data Sources
The numerator comes from the state's emergency department discharge database, which records every visit to licensed hospitals in the state, with age, county of residence, diagnosis and external cause codes. The denominator comes from the Census Bureau's county population estimates for July 1 of each year. Rates are given per 1,000 older residents per year. Defining the population, numerator and denominator in this way follows standard epidemiologic practice (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012).
Rates in 2024
In 2024, Harmon County residents aged 65 and older made 2,310 fall-related emergency department visits, a rate of 55.0 per 1,000. The rate doubled from ages 65-74 to 75-84 and rose again among those 85 and older, at 112.0 per 1,000, or more than one visit for every nine residents in that age group. Women had a higher rate than men.
Table 1
Fall-Related ED Visits Among Residents 65 and Older, Harmon County, 2024
| Group | Visits (numerator) | Residents (denominator) | Rate per 1,000 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ages 65-74 | 840 | 24,000 | 35.0 | |
| Ages 75-84 | 910 | 13,000 | 70.0 | |
| Ages 85 and older | 560 | 5,000 | 112.0 | |
| Women 65+ | 1,480 | 23,500 | 63.0 | |
| Men 65+ | 830 | 18,500 | 44.9 | |
| All residents 65+ | 2,310 | 42,000 | 55.0 | |
Counts and populations are composite values for the exercise. Each rate equals visits divided by residents, multiplied by 1,000, for calendar year 2024.
Has the Rate Changed? Crude and Age-Specific Comparisons
In 2019, Harmon County residents aged 65 and older made 2,050 fall-related visits among 38,000 residents, a crude rate of 53.9 per 1,000. The crude rate in 2024, 55.0, is slightly higher. But the older population also changed: between 2019 and 2024, the county's residents aged 85 and older grew faster than younger groups, as baby boomers aged. Because fall rates rise steeply with age, an older age structure can raise the crude rate even if the rate within each age group stays the same. Age is a potential confounder of the comparison between years.
Within every age group, the 2024 rate was slightly lower than in 2019. The crude rate rose only because the population shifted toward older ages, the same pattern of confounding by a third variable seen earlier in the course. Applying 2024's age-specific rates to the 2019 population, a direct standardization, gives an expected rate of about 53.0 per 1,000, below 2019's 53.9. On a common age structure, the fall-related visit rate changed little and, if anything, fell slightly.
Table 2
Age-Specific Rates, 2019 and 2024
| Age group | 2019 visits / residents | 2019 rate per 1,000 | 2024 visits / residents | 2024 rate per 1,000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65-74 | 810 / 23,000 | 35.2 | 840 / 24,000 | 35.0 | |
| 75-84 | 800 / 11,200 | 71.4 | 910 / 13,000 | 70.0 | |
| 85+ | 440 / 3,800 | 115.8 | 560 / 5,000 | 112.0 | |
| All 65+ | 2,050 / 38,000 | 53.9 | 2,310 / 42,000 | 55.0 | |
Within each age group, the 2024 rate is slightly lower than the 2019 rate; the crude rate rose because a larger share of residents were in the oldest groups.
Interpreting the Change
The age-specific declines are small, and with numerators of several hundred visits per group, differences of one or two visits per 1,000 could reflect chance. The paper therefore does not claim that falls declined. It does claim that the rise in the crude rate is explained by aging, not by a higher risk of falling at any given age.
Three surveillance cautions apply. First, emergency department data count only falls that led to a visit; most falls do not, and about half of older adults who fall do not tell their health care provider (Bergen et al., 2016). Second, coding practices for external causes can change between years; an increase in the share of injury visits with a recorded external cause would raise the fall count without any change in falls. Third, the county's population estimates are revised each year, and rates for 2019 calculated with older estimates may differ from those calculated with newer ones.
Implications
The number of fall-related visits rose by 260 from 2019 to 2024, from 2,050 to 2,310, even though age-specific rates did not. For health services, that count matters: emergency departments, ambulance services and rehabilitation programs must handle more visits as the population ages. For prevention, the age-specific rates matter: they show where risk is concentrated. Residents 85 and older made up 12% of the older population in 2024 (5,000 of 42,000) but accounted for 24% of fall-related visits (560 of 2,310). Prevention programs that screen for fall risk and address medications, strength and balance would reach the most visits per person screened in that group.
Conclusion
In 2024, Harmon County residents aged 65 and older made 2,310 fall-related emergency department visits, 55.0 per 1,000 residents, with rates rising steeply with age. The crude rate was higher than in 2019, but within each age group it was slightly lower; the crude increase reflected an older population, not a higher risk at any age. Every figure in this paper can be rebuilt from its stated numerator, denominator and year.
References
Bergen, G., Stevens, M. R., & Burns, E. R. (2016). Falls and fall injuries among adults aged ≥65 years: United States, 2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(37), 993-998. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6537a2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Principles of epidemiology in public health practice: An introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics (3rd ed.). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/index.html
Moreland, B., Kakara, R., & Henry, A. (2020). Trends in nonfatal falls and fall-related injuries among adults aged ≥65 years: United States, 2012-2018. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(27), 875-881. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6927a5
HLTH 4200 Week 11 instructions, in plain terms
The closing applied paper asks you to carry one public health problem through the methods of the whole course. Write a case definition and identify data sources for numerator and denominator. Calculate rates for the most recent year by key groups, showing every numerator and denominator. Compare with an earlier year, and check whether a shift in population structure could explain any change, adjusting if needed. Discuss surveillance limitations that affect interpretation. Draw implications for services and prevention that follow from your numbers. Write so that a reader could rebuild any figure from your methods section. Keep the national context brief and focus the paper on your own calculations, since the skill being assessed is applying methods, not summarizing literature.
Inside the HLTH 4200 Week 11 example
The paper opens with national context from Bergen and colleagues and Moreland and colleagues. A case definition section specifies residents aged 65 and older with fall-coded emergency visits. A data section names the discharge database and population estimates, citing the CDC primer. Table 1 gives 2024 rates by age and sex. Table 2 compares age-specific rates for 2019 and 2024, showing that the crude rise reflects aging, and a direct standardization confirms it. A section interprets the change with surveillance cautions, and an implications section distinguishes counts for service planning from rates for prevention, before the conclusion. Every table states its numerators and denominators so each figure can be rebuilt.
HLTH 4200 Week 11 rubric: what earns full marks
Faculty grade the applied paper on accurate, reproducible methods and sound interpretation. Every rate should show its numerator, denominator and year. A clear case definition and named data sources are expected. Checking for confounding by population structure, and adjusting where needed, is often the most heavily weighted analytic step. Faculty value papers that avoid overstating small changes and that discuss surveillance limitations honestly. Implications should follow from the numbers. The paper should demonstrate skills from across the course, from definitions to adjustment. Papers that report crude trends without considering age, or that present rates without denominators, earn less. Tables should be internally consistent, with groups summing to totals.
Common HLTH 4200 Week 11 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Choose a problem with data you can define clearly, then write your case definition first. Find numerator and denominator sources for the same population and years. Build a table of rates by age and sex, then compare years, looking at age-specific rates before the crude rate. If the crude and age-specific comparisons disagree, standardize. Write down every caveat about how the data were collected. Then ask what your numbers mean for services and for prevention, separately. A sample applied paper for a topic you are assigned is something we can draft. Before submitting, pick any number in your paper at random and try to rebuild it from your methods section alone.
Get a HLTH 4200 Week 11 example written to your instructions
Share the Week 11 paper prompt and rubric, plus the condition you have followed this term and any earlier work on it. The paper carries that condition from definition through rates to a conclusion that stays inside the design, with every figure traceable. Your first sample is free; it comes back in 24-48 hours.
More HLTH 4200 papers and BS in Public Health samples
- HLTH 4200 Week 1: Case Definition
- HLTH 4200 Week 2: Surveillance Note
- HLTH 4200 Week 3: Rate Calculation
- HLTH 4200 Week 4: Denominator Audit
- HLTH 4200 Week 5: Two-by-Two Table
- HLTH 4200 Week 6: Study Design Comparison
- HLTH 4200 Week 7: Confounding Write-Up
- HLTH 4200 Week 8: Screening Accuracy Write-Up
- HLTH 4200 Week 9: Outbreak Narrative
- HLTH 4200 Week 10: Causal Criteria Essay
- HLTH 3115 Week 11: Course Reflection
- HLTH 2500 Week 11: Course Reflection
- HLTH 2110 Week 11: Course Reflection
- HLTH 1000 Week 11: Course Reflection
HLTH 4200 Week 11 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HLTH 4200 Week 11 sample paper?
The applied epidemiology paper on fall-related emergency visits among older adults, with its rate tables and references, is free to read here.
What rate does the HLTH 4200 Week 11 example report for 2024?
55.0 fall-related emergency visits per 1,000 county residents aged 65 and older.
Did the rate rise between 2019 and 2024?
The crude rate rose slightly, but every age-specific rate fell slightly; the crude rise reflected an older population.
How is the comparison adjusted?
By direct standardization, applying 2024 age-specific rates to the 2019 population.
What does the paper recommend for prevention?
Focusing fall prevention on residents 85 and older, who were 12% of older residents but accounted for 24% of visits.