| Course | HLTH 4115 Strategic Planning and Marketing in Healthcare |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 5 |
| Paper type | Segmentation brief |
| Length | About 680 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Healthcare Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 4115 Week 5
Segmentation Brief: Five Injury Groups in the Northern Service Area, Two to Design Around and One Named Out of Scope
Student Name
Walden University
HLTH 4115: Strategic Planning and Marketing in Healthcare
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Segmentation Brief: Five Injury Groups in the Northern Service Area, Two to Design Around and One Named Out of Scope
Purpose
This brief divides the injured residents of the northern service area into groups that would need different things from a walk-in orthopedic clinic, then decides which groups the clinic will be designed around. Smith (1956) described segmentation as recognizing that a market is made of groups with different wants and adjusting the offer to fit them, rather than offering one product to everyone. The point of the exercise is the choice, which strategy texts treat as a decision about the scope of a service rather than a detail of promotion (Ginter et al., 2018). Figures are illustrative for a composite county.
Five Segments
Table 1 sets out five segments and what each would need.
Table 1
Injury Segments in the Northern Service Area (Illustrative)
| Segment | Typical injury | What they need from a clinic | Main coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Youth athletes and their parents | Wrist, ankle and finger fractures; sprains | Evening and weekend hours, pediatric skill, fast follow-up, clear price | Employer plans, some Medicaid |
| Active adults 25 to 54 | Sprains, tendon and knee injuries | After-work hours, quick imaging, return-to-activity advice | Employer plans |
| Injured workers | Back strains, hand and shoulder injuries | Employer reporting, work-status notes, daytime access | Workers' compensation |
| Adults on Medicaid or uninsured | All of the above | A walk-in option that accepts their plan or offers assistance | Medicaid, none |
| Older adults with falls | Hip and wrist fractures, head injuries | Emergency evaluation, imaging beyond X-ray, admission pathway | Medicare |
The Segments the Clinic Is Designed Around
The clinic will be designed around youth athletes and their parents and adults on Medicaid or uninsured. Youth athletes account for about a third of the area's injury visits to the emergency department and cluster in the evening and weekend hours that no orthopedic option now covers. Residents covered by those two Medicaid plans are shut out of the only orthopedic walk-in clinic, because the orthopedic group does not accept two Medicaid plans. Designing for these two groups means evening and weekend hours, staff comfortable with children, every Medicaid contract in place on day one and the hospital's financial assistance policy posted at the front desk. Active adults will be served well by the same design and need no separate features. Injured workers will be welcomed but the clinic will not build employer reporting services in its first year.
The Segment Named Out of Scope
Older adults with falls are out of scope for the clinic. This is not because they matter less. A fall in an older adult can hide a head injury, a hip fracture that X-ray misses or a medical cause such as a heart rhythm problem, and these patients need the emergency department's full evaluation and a pathway to admission. A walk-in clinic that invited them would risk delaying care. The clinic's messages will say plainly that adults over 65 with a fall belong in the emergency department, by ambulance if needed, and staff will be trained to redirect them. The hospital's fall prevention program, rather than the clinic, is the right service to design around this group.
What the Choice Costs
Designing around the Medicaid segment lowers the clinic's average payment per visit and will make its finances harder than a clinic designed only for commercially insured families. Marketing texts note that each segment chosen should be large enough, reachable and worth the cost of serving (Berkowitz, 2017). The Medicaid segment is large and reachable, through schools and the county's Medicaid enrollment office, but it is less profitable. The brief chooses it anyway because the nonprofit charter and the market gap both point to it, and because the youth athlete segment, which is mostly commercially insured, can carry part of the cost. Whether that balance works is a question for the financial plan.
Next Step
The positioning statement next week will be written for the two primary segments, and its claims will need to hold for both: a parent with a high-deductible plan and a parent on Medicaid should each recognize the clinic as theirs.
References
Berkowitz, E. N. (2017). Essentials of health care marketing (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Swayne, L. E. (2018). The strategic management of health care organizations (8th ed.). Wiley.
Smith, W. R. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 21(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224295602100102
HLTH 4115 Week 5 instructions, in plain terms
Segmentation briefs at this stage generally ask you to divide a population into groups with different needs and then decide which groups a service will be designed around. Define segments by need, not only by age or income, and show what each would need from the service. Then commit: name the primary segments and explain the choice with evidence from your earlier work. Name at least one segment as out of scope and explain why, including how that group will be served or redirected. Acknowledge what your choice costs, such as lower average payment, and say why you accept it. Keep the brief short. Close by connecting the choice to the positioning work that follows. Label any illustrative figures.
How this HLTH 4115 Week 5 example is built
The purpose section defines segmentation with Smith and states that the point is the choice, citing Ginter and colleagues on scope. A table lists five segments with typical injuries, needs and coverage: youth athletes, active adults, injured workers, residents on Medicaid or uninsured and older adults with falls. The next section chooses youth athletes and the Medicaid and uninsured group, with evidence from the market assessment and competitor analysis, and explains how active adults and injured workers fit. The out of scope section explains why older adults with falls need the emergency department and how the clinic will redirect them. The cost section cites Berkowitz on segment choice and accepts lower payment. A short closing links to positioning.
Where the marks sit in the HLTH 4115 Week 5 rubric
The half of the brief that separates grades is the commitment. Instructors look for primary segments chosen with evidence and at least one segment named out of scope with a clear reason and a plan for redirecting it. Segments should be defined by need, and the table should show what each would require from the service. Acknowledging the cost of the choice, and explaining why it is accepted, shows strategic judgment. References to segmentation theory should support the choice rather than decorate it. Brevity is valued, since a brief is meant to be read quickly. Clearly labeled illustrative figures, a link to the next stage of the plan and accurate citations finish what is graded.
HLTH 4115 Week 5 help: mistakes that cost marks
Segmentation briefs often describe several segments carefully and then conclude that the service will serve all of them, which leaves the positioning work with nothing to build on. Others segment by demographics only, missing differences in need. Some name an out-of-scope group without saying where those people should go instead. Write a one-line answer to the question, whom is this service designed around, before drafting anything else. Then write one line on whom it is not for and why. If those two lines are hard to write, the segments probably need redefining by need. Our writers can prepare a segmentation brief that commits to primary segments, names one out of scope and explains the cost of the choice.
Get a HLTH 4115 Week 5 example written to your instructions
The segmentation basis follows whatever the instructions point toward, and the screen then runs across each profile in turn. Send the prompt and the rubric your classroom posted, and the first custom sample comes back inside 24-48h at no charge. Patient counts an employer already holds are supplied by the student, never invented for a sample.
More HLTH 4115 papers and BS in Healthcare Administration samples
- HLTH 4115 Week 1: Nonprofit Marketing Discussion Post
- HLTH 4115 Week 2: Environmental Scan Paper
- HLTH 4115 Week 3: Service Area Market Assessment
- HLTH 4115 Week 4: Competitor Scouting Report
- HLTH 4115 Week 6: Positioning Statement Paper
- HLTH 4115 Week 7: Price and Access Discussion Post
- HLTH 4115 Week 8: New Service Proposal Paper
- HLTH 4115 Week 9: Marketing Message Draft
- HLTH 4115 Week 10: Healthcare Marketing Plan
- HLTH 4115 Week 11: Strategic Plan Defense
- HLTH 4110 Week 5: Care Compare Data Read
- HLTH 4100 Week 5: Incentive Discussion Post
- HLTH 4000 Week 5: Span of Control Discussion Post
- HLTH 1005 Week 5: Access Barriers Analysis
HLTH 4115 Week 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HLTH 4115 Week 5 sample paper?
This page shows the entire segmentation brief and its segment table, open to read free of charge.
Which segments does the HLTH 4115 Week 5 brief choose?
Youth athletes with their parents, and residents on Medicaid or uninsured, especially those on plans the orthopedic group does not accept.
Which segment is named out of scope?
Older adults with falls, because a fall can hide a head injury, a missed hip fracture or a medical cause that needs emergency evaluation.
What does choosing the Medicaid segment cost?
A lower average payment per visit, which the brief accepts because the nonprofit charter and the market gap both point to that group.
How will active adults and injured workers be served?
Active adults are served well by the same design; injured workers are welcomed, but employer reporting services wait until after the first year.