HLTH 3110 Week 10 State Legislative Policy Brief Example

Current Issues in Healthcare Policy and Practice Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This HLTH 3110 Week 10 legislative brief example is addressed to a state senator who chairs the health committee and opens with the request itself: ask for the postpartum coverage audit results at this year's Medicaid budget hearing and support a modest outreach line. Late in Walden HLTH 3110 the reader changes from instructor to lawmaker, and this BS in Healthcare Administration brief is graded on whether the senator would read past the first paragraph. It explains why the committee should care, gives a one-paragraph background with the federal laws and Trost and colleagues' review data, and describes three ways coverage can end early, citing Daw and colleagues. It explains what an audit would cost and show without inventing a state figure, offers five ready-to-use hearing questions and states what it does not ask for, citing Lipsky on front-line delivery.

CourseHLTH 3110 Current Issues in Healthcare Policy and Practice
WeekWeek 10
Paper typeLegislative brief
LengthAbout 600 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramBS in Healthcare Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for HLTH 3110 Week 10

1

Legislative Brief: Ask for the Postpartum Coverage Audit Results at This Year's Medicaid Budget Hearing

Student Name

Walden University

HLTH 3110: Current Issues in Healthcare Policy and Practice

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title is the request itself, because a legislator decides from the first line whether to keep reading.
2

Legislative Brief: Ask for the Postpartum Coverage Audit Results at This Year's Medicaid Budget Hearing

For the Senator Who Chairs the Health Committee

The request. At this year's Medicaid budget hearing, please ask the Medicaid director two questions: how many people in pregnancy-related coverage had their coverage end before 12 months after pregnancy since the state adopted the 12-month option, and what the agency is doing about it. Please also support a modest outreach line, estimated by agency staff, for notices to postpartum enrollees and a fact sheet for clinics.

Why it matters to the committee. The legislature chose to provide 12 months of postpartum coverage, and the budget pays for it. Whether people actually keep that coverage depends on eligibility systems, notices and clinic staff. If coverage is ending early, the state is paying for a policy that is not fully reaching the people it was meant for. Asking the question costs nothing and gives the agency a reason to find the answer.

What this page is doingThe brief opens with the request and the reason the committee should care, which is what keeps a legislator reading past the first paragraph.
3

Background in Brief

Federal law first allowed states to extend postpartum Medicaid from about 60 days to 12 months beginning in April 2022, and later made the option permanent (Pub. L. No. 117-2; Pub. L. No. 117-328). Our state adopted it. The extension responds to evidence that many pregnancy-related deaths occur well after the first postpartum week, up to a year after pregnancy ends, and that most are considered preventable by the review committees that study them (Trost et al., 2022). Coverage changes and gaps around childbirth were common before the extension, especially among people with Medicaid (Daw et al., 2017).

What this page is doingBackground is kept to one paragraph with the law and the core evidence, enough for a legislator to trust the request.
4

What Could Go Wrong

Three problems can end coverage early even after a state adopts the extension: eligibility records created before the change may still carry the old end date; notices sent to old addresses can lead to procedural closures; and clinic staff who learned the old rule may tell patients their coverage is ending. A front-desk worker relying on an outdated record can, without doing anything wrong, tell an eligible patient she is about to lose coverage. These problems are invisible in the agency's adoption paperwork and show up only in case-level data.

What this page is doingThe problems are explained in plain terms with one concrete example, so the senator can repeat them in a hearing.
5

What the Audit Would Cost and Show

An audit of closures in pregnancy-related categories over the past year uses data the agency already holds. Its cost is staff time and, if fixes are needed, vendor time for system changes. An illustrative analysis prepared for this brief estimated that the extension's recurring state cost is many times larger than a one-time audit and outreach effort, so verification protects a much larger investment. The audit would show how many early closures occurred, why, and whether they are concentrated in older cases, procedural closures or particular regions.

What this page is doingCosts are stated honestly without inventing a state-specific figure, and the brief explains what the legislator would learn.
6

Suggested Questions for the Hearing

1. Since adopting the 12-month option, how many enrollees in pregnancy-related coverage had coverage end before 12 months, and what were the reasons?

2. Were all older cases converted to the 12-month end date, and when was that confirmed?

3. How many notices to postpartum enrollees were returned as undeliverable last year?

4. What has the agency told clinics and health plans about the change?

5. What would it cost to send two plain-language notices to each postpartum enrollee confirming coverage continues?

What this page is doingReady-to-use questions make the brief immediately useful, which is what separates a legislative brief from a class paper.
7

What This Brief Does Not Ask

This brief does not ask for new eligibility, new benefits or a change to the 12-month period. It asks the committee to confirm that a policy it already funds is working. Front-line delivery shapes what any policy becomes in practice (Lipsky, 2010), and legislative oversight is one of the few tools that reaches that level.

What this page is doingStating what the brief does not ask lowers the barrier to agreement and keeps the request narrow.
8

References

American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2, 135 Stat. 4 (2021).

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Pub. L. No. 117-328, 136 Stat. 4459 (2022).

Daw, J. R., Hatfield, L. A., Swartz, K., & Sommers, B. D. (2017). Women in the United States experience high rates of coverage 'churn' in months before and after childbirth. Health Affairs, 36(4), 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1241

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniversary expanded ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.

Trost, S. L., Beauregard, J., Njie, F., Berry, J., Harvey, A., & Goodman, D. A. (2022). Pregnancy-related deaths: Data from maternal mortality review committees in 36 US states, 2017-2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Reading the HLTH 3110 Week 10 instructions

A legislative brief at this point usually asks you to write for someone who could actually move a policy. Open with the request, not the background, so the reader knows what you want in the first lines. Explain why it matters to that reader's responsibilities, such as oversight of money the legislature already approved. Keep background short and sourced. Explain the problem in plain language a legislator could repeat in a hearing. Describe costs honestly. Offer practical tools, such as questions the legislator could ask. State what you are not asking for, which lowers resistance. Keep the brief short, scannable and free of jargon.

How the HLTH 3110 Week 10 example is put together

The first section states the request and the committee's reason to care. The background section gives the federal laws and the review committee findings in one paragraph and cites Daw and colleagues on gaps around birth. The problem section explains outdated records, returned notices and outdated clinic information, with the front-desk example. The cost section explains that an audit uses existing data and protects a much larger recurring investment. The questions section lists five questions for the Medicaid director. The final section states that the brief asks for no new eligibility or benefits and cites Lipsky on oversight reaching the front line. The whole brief fits on a page and a half.

Reading the HLTH 3110 Week 10 rubric

Faculty usually reward legislative briefs that lead with a clear request and keep the reader's role in view. A brief that starts with history or a literature review loses its reader early. Credit increases when the problem is explained in plain language, costs are presented honestly and practical tools, such as hearing questions, are included. Faculty value a narrow request and a statement of what is not being asked. Brevity and readability matter more here than in earlier papers. Citations should be present but unobtrusive, so they support the request without slowing the reader. Instructors also check whether the request could realistically be carried out within the legislative calendar the brief describes.

Common HLTH 3110 Week 10 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Legislative briefs often read like class papers with a new title, opening with background and arriving at a request on the last page. Others make requests too broad for one legislator to act on. Some fill the page with jargon such as categorical eligibility and capitation. Write the request in one sentence and put it first. Ask what the legislator controls, such as budget hearings, and shape the request around it. Replace every technical term with plain words. Our writers can prepare a legislative brief for this course that leads with a clear request and gives a legislator tools to act on it. Ask someone outside the course to read only your first paragraph.

Get a HLTH 3110 Week 10 example written to your instructions

The desk writes the brief to your recipient and your ask, in the format the Week 10 prompt specifies, first sample free and returned inside 24-48h. This stays advocacy writing as an academic exercise: nothing is sent anywhere, no office is contacted, and the finished document is yours to work from when you write the version you turn in.

Request this week free All HLTH 3110 weeks Finished samples

More HLTH 3110 papers and BS in Healthcare Administration samples

HLTH 3110 Week 10 questions, answered

Where can I find a free HLTH 3110 Week 10 sample paper?

The brief to the senator, including the five hearing questions, appears above in full for students, free.

What does the HLTH 3110 Week 10 brief ask the senator to do?

Ask the Medicaid director at the budget hearing how many postpartum enrollees lost coverage before 12 months and what is being done, and support a modest outreach line.

Why should the committee care?

Because the legislature already chose and funds 12 months of coverage, and early closures mean that spending is not fully reaching the people it was meant for.

Does the brief ask for new coverage?

No; it asks only for confirmation that the existing policy is working and for a small outreach effort.

Why include hearing questions?

So the senator can act immediately, without staff having to translate the brief into questions.