| Course | DDHA 9500 DHA Project Prospectus |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 5 |
| Paper type | Peer critique |
| Length | About 680 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Healthcare Administration (DHA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DDHA 9500 Week 5
Where a Classmate's Problem and Purpose Stop Matching: A Peer Critique of a Draft on First-Year Nurse Turnover, With Edits Written Out
Student Name
Walden University
DDHA 9500: DHA Project Prospectus
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Where a Classmate's Problem and Purpose Stop Matching: A Peer Critique of a Draft on First-Year Nurse Turnover, With Edits Written Out
The Two Sentences Under Review
Problem sentence, as drafted by my classmate Joanna: "At a 220-bed community hospital, newly hired registered nurses leave within their first year at a rate that strains unit staffing and increases agency spending, and national data show that first-year turnover remains high."
Purpose sentence, as drafted: "The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore how nurse managers across the health system perceive the effectiveness of the nurse residency program in improving patient satisfaction."
The problem is clear and worth studying. The purpose answers a different one. The defects below are listed by type rather than by order in the draft, and each comes with the words that show it and a proposed edit.
Defect 1: The Population Changes
The problem concerns "newly hired registered nurses" who "leave within their first year." The purpose concerns "nurse managers." Managers may have useful views, but they are not the people whose departure is the problem, and they may not know why nurses left. A reader moving from the first sentence to the second would expect to hear from new nurses or about them.
Proposed edit: replace "nurse managers" with "registered nurses who left the hospital within their first year of employment."
Defect 2: The Setting Widens
The problem is located at "a 220-bed community hospital." The purpose reaches "across the health system." The draft does not say whether turnover is high at the other hospitals, so the purpose extends the study to settings the problem never described.
Proposed edit: replace "across the health system" with "at a 220-bed community hospital."
Defect 3: An Outcome Appears From Nowhere
The problem names two consequences, strained staffing and agency spending. The purpose introduces a third, "patient satisfaction," which the problem never mentions. An outcome that enters only in the purpose suggests the study has drifted toward a different question.
Proposed edit: remove "in improving patient satisfaction."
Defect 4: The Verb Promises More Than the Approach Can Produce
"Perceive the effectiveness of the nurse residency program" asks a qualitative study to judge effectiveness, which requires comparing outcomes, for example retention among nurses who completed the residency and those who did not. Perceptions of effectiveness can be explored, but the sentence reads as though the study will establish whether the program works. Creswell and Creswell (2018) describe qualitative purpose statements as exploring a central phenomenon with participants at a site, and "effectiveness" is an evaluative judgment rather than a phenomenon.
Proposed edit: replace "perceive the effectiveness of the nurse residency program" with "describe the reasons for their departure, including their experience of the nurse residency program."
The Smaller of the Two Alternatives
There are two ways to make the sentences match. Joanna could rewrite the problem to fit the purpose, making the problem about managers' views of the residency program across the system. Or she could rewrite the purpose to fit the problem. I recommend the second, because the problem statement is the stronger sentence and already has evidence behind it, and because rewriting the purpose changes one sentence rather than the foundation of the project.
Combining the four edits, the revised purpose would read: "The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore how registered nurses who left a 220-bed community hospital within their first year of employment describe the reasons for their departure, including their experience of the nurse residency program."
One Further Note
The problem's evidence, "national data show that first-year turnover remains high," would be stronger with a figure and a source. Kovner et al. (2014) showed that reported turnover rates vary widely depending on how turnover is defined and measured, so the draft should state which definition the hospital uses, for example voluntary separations within twelve months of hire, before comparing it with any national figure. Palinkas et al. (2015) may also help when the sampling section is written, since reaching nurses who have already left will require purposeful recruitment.
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Kovner, C. T., Brewer, C. S., Fatehi, F., & Jun, J. (2014). What does nurse turnover rate mean and what is the rate? Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 15(3-4), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154414547953
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
The Walden DDHA 9500 Week 5 instructions
Peer critique assignments in a prospectus course usually ask you to review a classmate's draft and suggest improvements. Quote the sentences you are critiquing so the reader never has to remember the draft. Organize your critique by defect rather than by the order of the draft: a population that changes, a setting that widens, an outcome that appears in one sentence and not the other, a verb that commits to more than the approach can produce. For each, show the words that reveal it and write out a proposed edit in full. Where there are two ways to fix a mismatch, recommend the smaller one and explain why. Be direct; critique written to be kind reads as agreement and does not help.
How the DDHA 9500 Week 5 example is put together
The critique opens by quoting the classmate's problem and purpose sentences. Four sections follow, one per defect. The first shows the population shifting from new nurses to nurse managers and proposes replacing the latter. The second shows the setting widening and proposes restoring the single hospital. The third shows patient satisfaction entering only in the purpose and proposes removing it. The fourth explains why "perceive the effectiveness" asks a qualitative design for an evaluative judgment, citing Creswell and Creswell, and proposes a new phrase. A section recommends rewriting the purpose rather than the problem and combines the edits into one sentence. A final note suggests stating a turnover definition, citing Kovner and colleagues, and mentions purposeful sampling.
DDHA 9500 Week 5 rubric: what earns full marks
Peer critiques are graded on precision and usefulness. Quoting the material under review earns credit because it makes every observation checkable. Markers reward organization by defect, which shows analytic thinking, over a running commentary on the draft. Each observation should point to specific words and come with a concrete edit written in full. Recognizing which fix is smaller and recommending it demonstrates judgment about scope. Methodological sources should support claims about what a design can produce. Tone should be direct and respectful; vague encouragement without substance earns little. A critique that a classmate could act on immediately is the standard.
Common DDHA 9500 Week 5 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The usual problem is a critique that praises the draft and offers general suggestions such as "clarify your purpose." Name the exact mismatch and quote it. Write the edit out so your classmate can paste it in. Check population, setting, outcome and verb, since those are where problem and purpose most often drift apart. Recommend the smallest change that fixes the mismatch. Avoid rewriting the classmate's project into the one you would choose. If you need help critiquing a draft for your own course, we can prepare a defect-by-defect review. End your critique with the revised sentence in full, so your classmate sees the combined effect of your edits at once.
Get a DDHA 9500 Week 5 example written to your instructions
Forward the critique prompt, the rubric and the draft the section circulated for review, and a critique quoting that draft, naming each mismatch and writing out the repairs comes back to you. First one free, within 24 to 48 hours. Only classroom materials are needed here; nothing gathered at a workplace or site is asked for.
More DDHA 9500 papers and DHA samples
- DDHA 9500 Week 1: Topic Narrowing Post
- DDHA 9500 Week 2: Problem Statement
- DDHA 9500 Week 3: Significance Brief
- DDHA 9500 Week 4: Purpose Statement
- DDHA 9500 Week 6: Literature Summary
- DDHA 9500 Week 7: Approach Outline
- DDHA 9500 Week 8: Feasibility Memo
- DDHA 9500 Week 9: Alignment Check
- DDHA 9500 Week 10: Prospectus Draft
- DDHA 9500 Week 11: Revision Plan
- DDHA 8801 Week 5: Positioning Statement
- DDHA 8703 Week 5: Descriptive Analysis
- DDHA 8601 Week 5: Cost of Ownership Analysis
- DDHA 8503 Week 5: Stakeholder Analysis
DDHA 9500 Week 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DDHA 9500 Week 5 sample paper?
The defect-by-defect peer critique of a nurse turnover draft is free to read here.
What draft does the DDHA 9500 Week 5 example critique?
A classmate's problem and purpose sentences on first-year registered nurse turnover at a community hospital.
What defects does the critique find?
A changed population, a widened setting, an outcome added in the purpose and a verb promising an evaluative judgment.
Which fix does the critique recommend?
Rewriting the purpose to match the problem, since that changes one sentence rather than the project's foundation.
What is the revised purpose?
To explore how nurses who left a 220-bed community hospital within their first year describe their reasons for leaving.