DDHA 8703 Week 10 Data Governance Memo Example

Advanced Health Analytics and Data-Driven Decision Making Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This DDHA 8703 Week 10 data governance memo example tells an analytics committee at a composite health system who owns a measure's definition and who may change it once reports depend on it. Walden DDHA 8703 asks DHA students for a memo that assigns rather than describes, and this one opens with two recent unannounced changes, a no-show denominator and an arrival time field. It assigns three roles with positions attached: a definition owner, a data steward and the committee. It sets a size threshold above which changes need approval and treats each change as an event, with impact analysis, 30 days' notice and three months of dual reporting. A dispute route with deadlines and rules for restating or visibly breaking historical series follow. Holmes and colleagues, Kahn and colleagues and Berwick and colleagues inform the design, and an approval routing closes it.

CourseDDHA 8703 Advanced Health Analytics and Data-Driven Decision Making
WeekWeek 10
Paper typeData governance memo
LengthAbout 810 words, 4 pages
FormatMemo, APA 7 citations
SchoolWalden University
ProgramDoctor of Healthcare Administration (DHA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DDHA 8703 Week 10

1

Memorandum

To: Analytics Committee, Northgate Health

From: Director of Enterprise Analytics

Date: October 12, 2026

Re: Ownership and change control for reported measure definitions

 

Decision Requested

The committee is asked to adopt the roles and procedures below for every measure that appears in a recurring Northgate report, effective January 1. The need is concrete. Last year the definition of the outpatient no-show rate changed without notice, and clinic managers spent weeks investigating a rise that came entirely from the change. In July, two emergency departments changed what their arrival time field records, and no report flagged it. Both changes were reasonable. Neither had an owner, a procedure or a notice.

Roles

Each reported measure will have three assigned roles.

The definition owner is the operational leader accountable for the measure, for example the ambulatory operations director for the no-show rate and the emergency services director for emergency length of stay. The owner decides what the measure is meant to show and approves the written definition.

The data steward is a named analyst in enterprise analytics who maintains the definition document, the code that computes the measure and the record of every change. The steward makes sure that the published definition and the running code always match.

The analytics committee approves any change above the threshold below and hears disputes that cannot be settled between owner and steward.

Holmes et al. (2014), reviewing governance of shared clinical data warehouses, found that clear roles and documented procedures were central to governance that worked, and this memo applies that finding to individual measures.

What Counts as a Change Requiring Approval

Changes are divided by size. Technical corrections that do not alter the numerator or denominator population, such as fixing code to match an already approved definition, may be approved by the steward and the owner together and recorded in the change log. Any other change requires committee approval: altering who or what is counted in the numerator or denominator, changing the source of a field, or any change that would move the measure's value for the past twelve months by one percentage point or more, or by 5% of its value, whichever is smaller. Changes in how a source system records a field, such as the arrival time change, count as changes to the measure, because the measure moves even if no one touched its code.

Change Procedure

A change is treated as an event with a procedure around it. The requester submits a change form describing the reason. The steward recomputes the past twelve months under both the old and new definitions and reports the difference. If approval is needed, the committee considers the request at its next monthly meeting. Once a change is approved, recipients of every report that includes the measure receive notice at least 30 days before it takes effect, naming the measure, the change, the expected shift and the effective date. For the first three months after the change, reports show the measure under both definitions side by side. Kahn et al. (2016) emphasize conformance between data and their stated definitions as a basic dimension of data quality, and dual reporting is how Northgate will keep readers able to tell a change in definition from a change in performance.

Disputes

Disputes will happen, and they need a route. If a requester and an owner disagree about a change, the steward first prepares the two-definition comparison and meets with both. If they still disagree, the committee chair decides within 30 days. If either party believes the decision affects patient safety or regulatory reporting, the chief medical officer or chief operating officer, as appropriate, makes the final decision within a further 30 days. A measure under dispute keeps its current definition until the dispute is resolved.

Historical Reporting

When a definition changes, historical figures are restated under the new definition for the previous 24 months wherever the data allow. Where they cannot be restated, for example because a field did not exist, trend charts will show a visible break at the effective date with a note explaining it, and the two periods will not be joined by a line. No report will silently mix values computed under different definitions. Berwick et al. (2003) argue that measurement supports improvement only when users trust and understand it, and an unmarked break in a series undermines exactly that.

Implementation

Enterprise analytics will assign owners and stewards to the 46 measures in current recurring reports by December 15 and bring the list to the committee for confirmation. The change form and log will be live by January 1.

Approval Routing

This memo goes first to the analytics committee for adoption, then to the chief operating officer for endorsement, and finally to the executive quality council for information. Once endorsed, it will be added to the analytics policy manual.

References

Berwick, D. M., James, B., & Coye, M. J. (2003). Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Medical Care, 41(1 Suppl.), I30-I38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200301001-00004

Holmes, J. H., Elliott, T. E., Brown, J. S., Raebel, M. A., Davidson, A., Nelson, A. F., Chung, A., La Chance, P., & Steiner, J. F. (2014). Clinical research data warehouse governance for distributed research networks in the USA: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(4), 730-736. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002370

Kahn, M. G., Callahan, T. J., Barnard, J., Bauck, A. E., Brown, J., Davidson, B. N., Estiri, H., Goerg, C., Holve, E., Johnson, S. G., Liaw, S.-T., Hamilton-Lopez, M., Meeker, D., Ong, T. C., Ryan, P., Shang, N., Weiskopf, N. G., Weng, C., Zozus, M. N., . . . Schilling, L. (2016). A harmonized data quality assessment terminology and framework for the secondary use of electronic health record data. eGEMs, 4(1), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1244

The Walden DDHA 8703 Week 10 instructions

Governance memos in this course typically ask you to propose how an organization should control some part of its data or reporting. Send the memo to whichever group holds the authority to adopt it, and open with the decision you need. Assign roles with positions attached rather than describing responsibilities in general. Define what kind of change requires approval, ideally with a size threshold. Treat changes as events with a procedure: request, impact analysis, notice and a transition period. Provide a route for resolving disputes, which many governance documents omit. Explain what happens to historical reporting when definitions change. Close with implementation steps and the routing the memo will follow for approval. Keep the memo short and decisive, written as instructions an organization could adopt.

Inside the DDHA 8703 Week 10 example

The memo opens with the decision requested and two examples of unannounced changes that caused confusion. A roles section assigns the definition owner, the data steward and the committee, with examples, and cites Holmes and colleagues on governance roles. A section sets the threshold separating technical corrections from changes requiring approval, including changes in how source systems record fields. The change procedure covers the request form, recalculation under both definitions, committee review, 30 days' notice and three months of dual reporting, citing Kahn and colleagues. The dispute section sets a three-step route with deadlines. The historical reporting section requires restatement or a visible break, citing Berwick and colleagues. Implementation dates and approval routing close the memo.

Where the marks sit in the DDHA 8703 Week 10 rubric

Governance memos are graded on whether they assign responsibility clearly and could be adopted as written. Markers look for roles attached to positions, a defined threshold for approval and a change procedure with notice and transition. A dispute route is often an explicit rubric element because it is commonly missing. Rules for historical reporting show understanding of how definition changes affect trends. Concrete implementation steps and approval routing demonstrate practicality. The memo should be concise and decisive in tone, and sources should support the governance design rather than define governance in general. Memos that anticipate the first dispute and settle where it will go tend to score well.

DDHA 8703 Week 10 help from the desk

Students often describe good governance principles without assigning anyone to carry them out. Name the role for each responsibility. Set a threshold so the committee is not asked to approve every small fix. Include notice and dual reporting, which protect readers from mistaking a definition change for a performance change. Write a dispute route with deadlines. Decide how historical figures will be handled before the first change happens. Keep it short. If you need a governance memo for your organization's measures, our writers can prepare one in memo format. Test your memo against a recent real change in your organization: would it have caught that change, notified the right people and kept the trend readable? If not, revise the threshold or the notice rule.

Get a DDHA 8703 Week 10 example written to your instructions

Send the Week 10 prompt and the rubric your classroom posted and the desk returns a memo written to that committee, first one free, inside 24-48 hours. The organization and its roles will be invented. Governance documents already adopted where you work stay internal to that place and are not source material here.

More DDHA 8703 papers and DHA samples

DDHA 8703 Week 10 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DDHA 8703 Week 10 sample paper?

The data governance memo on measure definitions is free to read on this page.

What roles does the DDHA 8703 Week 10 example assign?

A definition owner, a data steward who maintains documentation and code, and an analytics committee that approves larger changes.

Which changes need committee approval?

Any change to who or what is counted, a field's source, or any change moving the past year's value by one point or 5 percent.

How are definition changes communicated?

With 30 days' notice to every report recipient and three months of reporting under both definitions.

What happens to historical figures after a change?

They are restated for 24 months where possible, or trend charts show a visible break with an explanatory note.