Structure is compared under growth: the Week 3 DDBA 4990 memo sets two charts for one firm side by side and picks the arrangement that survives the next expansion. Searches like "ddba 4990 week 3 assignment example", "ddba4990 week 3 sample" and "ddba 4990 week 3 example" land here.
What a finished DDBA 4990 Week 3 structure memo looks like
A header block opens the memo, a one-sentence recommendation sits directly beneath it, and two charts follow across two to three pages. The example firm is a distributor of restaurant supplies organized by function, with purchasing, warehousing, sales and accounts each reporting to the owner. The first chart shows that arrangement with names replaced by titles. The second redraws the firm by region, each region holding its own sales and warehouse staff while purchasing and accounts stay central. A comparison section follows under three fixed criteria: coordination cost, duplication and speed of local decisions. The memo then applies both charts to the planned third region and shows where the functional version overloads the owner. A closing paragraph names what the regional choice costs, a second warehouse supervisor among other items.
How a DDBA 4990 Week 3 example is structured
The recommendation is placed first and the evidence follows, because a memo is read by someone deciding. Criteria are fixed before either chart is judged, which keeps the comparison from bending toward the preferred answer. Chandler's argument that structure follows strategy frames the whole memo in one sentence: the firm's plan to expand geographically is the strategy, and the structure question follows from it. Each criterion then gets a short paragraph in which both charts are scored in the same terms. Vocabulary is held tight, with reports to, span of control and unit each defined once, so the memo never says a department where it means a region. The growth test comes last and does the deciding work, since both structures can run the firm at its present size.
Recommendation beneath the header
One sentence: reorganize by region before the third branch opens. Everything after it is evidence for that sentence, so a reader with two minutes knows the answer and a reader with twenty can check it.
Criteria fixed before judging
Coordination cost, duplication and speed of local decisions are named and defined ahead of the comparison. Choosing the criteria after seeing which chart wins is the mistake this ordering prevents, and graders can usually tell.
Two charts, drawn to the same rules
Titles instead of names, one box per role, solid lines for reporting and nothing else. Drawing both charts the same way keeps a difference in the picture from being mistaken for a difference in the firm.
The growth test
Both structures are applied to the planned third region. Under the functional chart every regional question still reaches the owner; under the regional chart most stop one level lower. That contrast decides the memo.
What the choice costs
A second warehouse supervisor, duplicated sales administration and weaker purchasing leverage if regions start buying separately. Naming these costs plainly is what makes the recommendation read as a judgment rather than a preference.
Where marks go in DDBA 4990 Week 3
The graded question is which structure survives growth, so a memo describing both charts accurately and stopping short of a choice collects the description credit and forfeits the rest. Criteria stated before the comparison earn a share on their own, because they let a grader check that the recommendation follows from them. Charts are read closely: a reporting line drawn one way and described another way in the prose is a routine deduction. Chandler earns credit when the memo uses him to explain why the question arises now, not as a decorative opening citation. The cost paragraph is where careful memos separate from confident ones, and a recommendation naming no downside sounds like a sales pitch, not an analysis. Memo format, header lines included, carries a small fixed band.
Get a DDBA 4990 Week 3 example written to your instructions
Paste the Week 3 prompt and rubric and, if your section supplies a case firm, its details. Two charts, a comparison under stated criteria and a committed recommendation land within 24 to 48 hours, the first at no cost. A growth scenario from your prompt replaces the invented third region in the test.
DDBA 4990 Week 3 questions, answered
Which two structures should the memo compare?
Whichever two the firm could realistically adopt, which usually means its current arrangement and one alternative. Functional against divisional is the common pairing, with divisions set by product, region or customer type. A matrix is worth considering only for firms large enough to carry its coordination cost. Comparing an existing structure with an ideal nobody could staff wastes the comparison.
Does the memo need academic sources?
A few, placed where they explain something. Chandler's link between strategy and structure is the standard anchor, and a management text defining span of control or unity of command is useful where the memo relies on those terms. The case facts should come from the firm's own documents or the scenario your section supplies, not from the readings.
What if neither structure clearly survives growth?
Then the memo says which one fails more slowly and why, and states the change that would let it hold. A conditional recommendation is still a recommendation if its condition is stated precisely. What loses marks is declining to choose, since the prompt asks which arrangement survives and a memo that answers both has answered neither.