DBAX 9104C Week 5 Recommendation Cut Record Example

Business Consulting Research Project Stage 4 Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This DBAX 9104C Week 5 recommendation cut example takes eight draft recommendations down to four, and one of the four removed is the idea its author likes best. Walden DBAX 9104C asks for the cut to show that recommendations follow findings rather than preference, and the sample comes from a family-owned hardwood furniture maker in northern Indiana whose Canadian export share fell from 11 to 7 percent. A trade fair and French catalogs go because nothing in the study addressed them; extended payment terms go because only the sales director raised them. The hard cut is a dedicated export manager, which the author believes in and the data never tested; it becomes a question for future research. Leonidou, Block and Rousseau frame a DBA cut record built on evidence.

CourseDBAX 9104C Business Consulting Research Project Stage 4
WeekWeek 5
Paper typeRecommendation cut record
LengthAbout 820 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramDoctor of Business Administration (DBA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DBAX 9104C Week 5

1

Eight Recommendations Down to Four, Including the One I Liked Best: A Cut Record for a Consulting Study of a Family-Owned Furniture Maker's First Export Sales to Canada

Student Name

Walden University

DBAX 9104C: Business Consulting Research Project Stage 4

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title admits that the author's favorite idea was cut, which is the test of whether the cuts followed the evidence rather than preference.
2

Eight Recommendations Down to Four, Including the One I Liked Best: A Cut Record for a Consulting Study of a Family-Owned Furniture Maker's First Export Sales to Canada

Before the Cut

My consulting study examined the first two years of export sales at a family-owned furniture maker in northern Indiana that builds solid hardwood dining and bedroom furniture and began selling to Canadian retailers. Export orders reached 11 percent of revenue in year one and fell to 7 percent in year two. The study drew on interviews with the owners, the sales director, two production managers and four Canadian retail buyers, along with order records, freight invoices and returns data. My draft closing had eight recommendations:

1. Quote landed prices in Canadian dollars, including duty and freight.

2. Consolidate Canadian orders into full truckloads on a fixed monthly schedule.

3. Revise packaging for long-haul freight to cut damage claims.

4. Give Canadian buyers a dedicated order contact.

5. Exhibit at an international furniture trade fair.

6. Translate catalogs into French for Quebec retailers.

7. Hire a dedicated export manager.

8. Offer extended payment terms to new Canadian accounts.

Four survived. This record explains the four that did not.

What this page is doingThe record lists all eight drafts first, so a reader can see what was cut before learning why.
3

The Four Cut

Table 1

Recommendations Removed and Where They Went

RecommendationReason for removalDestination |
Exhibit at an international trade fairNo finding addressed trade fairs; idea came from my readingRemoved |
Translate catalogs into FrenchNo buyer interviewed was in Quebec; no finding addressed languageRemoved |
Offer extended payment termsSupported by one interview with the sales director onlyMentioned as an untested idea in the client report's appendix |
Hire a dedicated export managerNo finding tested whether a dedicated role would change resultsMoved to future research as a question |

Each removal agreed with the chair before the client report was drafted.

Cuts That Were Easy

The trade fair and French catalog recommendations came from my own reading on export development rather than from the study. Leonidou et al. (2002), in a meta-analysis of export performance, found trade fair participation and product adaptation among the marketing factors linked to export success in many studies. That made both ideas feel supported. But nothing in my data addressed either: no buyer mentioned trade fairs, and all four buyers interviewed were in Ontario and British Columbia. A recommendation in a consulting study must rest on a finding from that study; the literature can strengthen it, not replace it.

The extended payment terms idea had one source, the sales director, who believed that Canadian buyers wanted 60-day terms. None of the four buyers raised payment terms. One interview is not enough to recommend a change that would tie up the company's cash, so the idea appears in the client report's appendix as something the sales director suggested and the study could not check.

What this page is doingThe record separates easy cuts from hard ones, because the hard one shows whether the rule was applied when it was costly.
4

The Hard Cut

The export manager is the recommendation I believe in most. Every problem the study found, slow quotes in the wrong currency, damaged shipments, buyers unsure whom to call, looks like the work of nobody in particular. A dedicated person might fix all of them. Leonidou (2004), studying barriers to small business exporting, describes limited managerial time and knowledge as a common internal barrier, which fits what I saw.

But the study did not test it. No finding shows that firms with export managers did better, because the study examined one firm. The four surviving recommendations each address a specific finding: landed pricing addresses buyers' complaints about currency and duty surprises, truckload consolidation addresses freight costs that ran 14 percent of export order value, packaging addresses damage claims on 9 percent of export shipments, and a dedicated contact addresses buyers' reports of unanswered emails. The export manager would address all of these together, but that is an inference, and a hire is the most expensive recommendation on the list. It moves to future research as a question: would a dedicated export role improve results for small manufacturers in their first years of exporting?

How the Client Received the Cut

The owners asked about the export manager directly, since I had mentioned it in an early meeting. I explained that the four recommendations could be done by current staff and tested within a year, and that a hire could be considered if they did not work. Block (2011) describes the consultant's obligation to separate what the evidence shows from what the consultant personally believes, and to make both visible to the client. The owners now have both: the four tested-against-evidence recommendations in the report, and my opinion, labeled as opinion, in our conversation.

Confirming the Four

Each surviving recommendation was traced back to its finding and its sources before the cut was final. Rousseau (2006) calls for decisions to be based on the best available evidence with its quality made clear; four recommendations with clear evidence serve the owners better than eight of mixed quality.

References

Block, P. (2011). Flawless consulting: A guide to getting your expertise used (3rd ed.). Pfeiffer.

Leonidou, L. C. (2004). An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(3), 279-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00112.x

Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Samiee, S. (2002). Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 55(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00133-8

Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as "evidence-based management"? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256-269. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208679

What the DBAX 9104C Week 5 instructions ask for

The fifth week asks you to review every draft recommendation and remove those your findings do not support, even sensible ones. List all draft recommendations first. For each one removed, give the reason, such as no finding addressing it, a single source or an untested assumption, and its destination: removed, moved to an appendix as an untested idea, or turned into a question for future research. Explain the hardest cut at length, especially one you personally favor. Confirm that each surviving recommendation traces to a specific finding. Describe how you explained the cuts to the client. Use literature on your topic to show where ideas came from, and a source on evidence or consulting practice to justify the rule you applied.

How the DBAX 9104C Week 5 example is put together

The record lists eight drafts, from landed pricing in Canadian dollars to extended payment terms, and a table shows the four removed with reasons and destinations. Easy cuts come first: trade fairs and French catalogs were drawn from Leonidou and colleagues' meta-analysis, not from the study, and no buyer interviewed was in Quebec. Payment terms rested on one interview. The hard cut gets its own section: an export manager seems to answer every problem found, slow quotes, damage and unanswered emails, and Leonidou's work on small exporters' limited managerial time fits, but the study examined one firm and tested nothing about the role. Surviving recommendations are each tied to a finding, such as freight at 14 percent of export order value. The owners' question about the manager closes the record.

DBAX 9104C Week 5 rubric: what earns full marks

The cut record is graded on whether the rule was applied when it hurt. Removing ideas nobody liked proves little; removing the author's favorite, with the reason stated, shows that recommendations followed evidence. Instructors weigh the distinction between literature-supported and study-supported recommendations, because a consulting study's recommendations must rest on its own findings. Credit also goes to choosing the right destination for each cut, since an untested idea can still be useful as a future research question or an appendix note. Confirming that each survivor traces to a specific finding, with numbers, closes the loop. Describing how the cut was explained to the client earns credit when it separates evidence from the consultant's opinion, as Block recommends.

DBAX 9104C Week 5 help from the desk

The hardest part of this week is letting go of a recommendation you believe in. Ask of each draft: which finding in my study supports this, and where is it in my chapter? If the answer is a source you read or a conversation with a manager, the recommendation does not belong in the main list. Do not delete good ideas outright; move them to future research as questions or note them as untested. Check that your surviving recommendations are specific enough to test within a year. Be ready for the client to ask about the ones you cut, and separate your opinion from your findings when you answer. If deciding feels hard, our writers can work through your draft list with you against your findings.

Get a DBAX 9104C Week 5 example written to your instructions

Attach the Week 5 prompt and rubric and list your draft recommendations, marking the finding you think lies behind each. A cut record with reasons, destinations and the surviving set returns in 24-48h, free as a first sample. Its recommendations belong to an invented furniture maker, so none of the cuts are made to your list.

More DBAX 9104C papers and DBA samples

DBAX 9104C Week 5 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DBAX 9104C Week 5 sample paper?

The full cut record, all eight draft recommendations and the reasons for each removal, can be read lower on this page free of charge.

What study does the DBAX 9104C Week 5 record come from?

A family-owned hardwood furniture maker in Indiana whose first export sales to Canada fell from 11 to 7 percent of revenue.

Why were the trade fair and French catalog ideas cut?

They came from the author's reading, not the study, and no buyer interviewed was in Quebec or mentioned trade fairs.

Why was the export manager cut if the author favored it?

The study examined one firm and never tested whether a dedicated role would change results, so it became a future research question.

Which recommendations survived?

Landed pricing in Canadian dollars, monthly truckload consolidation, better freight packaging and a dedicated order contact for buyers.