| Course | DBAX 9104C Business Consulting Research Project Stage 4 |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 5 |
| Paper type | Recommendation cut record |
| Length | About 820 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DBAX 9104C Week 5
Eight Recommendations Down to Four, Including the One I Liked Best: A Cut Record for a Consulting Study of a Family-Owned Furniture Maker's First Export Sales to Canada
Student Name
Walden University
DBAX 9104C: Business Consulting Research Project Stage 4
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Eight Recommendations Down to Four, Including the One I Liked Best: A Cut Record for a Consulting Study of a Family-Owned Furniture Maker's First Export Sales to Canada
Before the Cut
My consulting study examined the first two years of export sales at a family-owned furniture maker in northern Indiana that builds solid hardwood dining and bedroom furniture and began selling to Canadian retailers. Export orders reached 11 percent of revenue in year one and fell to 7 percent in year two. The study drew on interviews with the owners, the sales director, two production managers and four Canadian retail buyers, along with order records, freight invoices and returns data. My draft closing had eight recommendations:
1. Quote landed prices in Canadian dollars, including duty and freight.
2. Consolidate Canadian orders into full truckloads on a fixed monthly schedule.
3. Revise packaging for long-haul freight to cut damage claims.
4. Give Canadian buyers a dedicated order contact.
5. Exhibit at an international furniture trade fair.
6. Translate catalogs into French for Quebec retailers.
7. Hire a dedicated export manager.
8. Offer extended payment terms to new Canadian accounts.
Four survived. This record explains the four that did not.
The Four Cut
Table 1
Recommendations Removed and Where They Went
| Recommendation | Reason for removal | Destination | |
|---|---|---|
| Exhibit at an international trade fair | No finding addressed trade fairs; idea came from my reading | Removed | |
| Translate catalogs into French | No buyer interviewed was in Quebec; no finding addressed language | Removed | |
| Offer extended payment terms | Supported by one interview with the sales director only | Mentioned as an untested idea in the client report's appendix | |
| Hire a dedicated export manager | No finding tested whether a dedicated role would change results | Moved to future research as a question | |
Each removal agreed with the chair before the client report was drafted.
Cuts That Were Easy
The trade fair and French catalog recommendations came from my own reading on export development rather than from the study. Leonidou et al. (2002), in a meta-analysis of export performance, found trade fair participation and product adaptation among the marketing factors linked to export success in many studies. That made both ideas feel supported. But nothing in my data addressed either: no buyer mentioned trade fairs, and all four buyers interviewed were in Ontario and British Columbia. A recommendation in a consulting study must rest on a finding from that study; the literature can strengthen it, not replace it.
The extended payment terms idea had one source, the sales director, who believed that Canadian buyers wanted 60-day terms. None of the four buyers raised payment terms. One interview is not enough to recommend a change that would tie up the company's cash, so the idea appears in the client report's appendix as something the sales director suggested and the study could not check.
The Hard Cut
The export manager is the recommendation I believe in most. Every problem the study found, slow quotes in the wrong currency, damaged shipments, buyers unsure whom to call, looks like the work of nobody in particular. A dedicated person might fix all of them. Leonidou (2004), studying barriers to small business exporting, describes limited managerial time and knowledge as a common internal barrier, which fits what I saw.
But the study did not test it. No finding shows that firms with export managers did better, because the study examined one firm. The four surviving recommendations each address a specific finding: landed pricing addresses buyers' complaints about currency and duty surprises, truckload consolidation addresses freight costs that ran 14 percent of export order value, packaging addresses damage claims on 9 percent of export shipments, and a dedicated contact addresses buyers' reports of unanswered emails. The export manager would address all of these together, but that is an inference, and a hire is the most expensive recommendation on the list. It moves to future research as a question: would a dedicated export role improve results for small manufacturers in their first years of exporting?
How the Client Received the Cut
The owners asked about the export manager directly, since I had mentioned it in an early meeting. I explained that the four recommendations could be done by current staff and tested within a year, and that a hire could be considered if they did not work. Block (2011) describes the consultant's obligation to separate what the evidence shows from what the consultant personally believes, and to make both visible to the client. The owners now have both: the four tested-against-evidence recommendations in the report, and my opinion, labeled as opinion, in our conversation.
Confirming the Four
Each surviving recommendation was traced back to its finding and its sources before the cut was final. Rousseau (2006) calls for decisions to be based on the best available evidence with its quality made clear; four recommendations with clear evidence serve the owners better than eight of mixed quality.
References
Block, P. (2011). Flawless consulting: A guide to getting your expertise used (3rd ed.). Pfeiffer.
Leonidou, L. C. (2004). An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(3), 279-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00112.x
Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Samiee, S. (2002). Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 55(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00133-8
Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as "evidence-based management"? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 256-269. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208679
What the DBAX 9104C Week 5 instructions ask for
The fifth week asks you to review every draft recommendation and remove those your findings do not support, even sensible ones. List all draft recommendations first. For each one removed, give the reason, such as no finding addressing it, a single source or an untested assumption, and its destination: removed, moved to an appendix as an untested idea, or turned into a question for future research. Explain the hardest cut at length, especially one you personally favor. Confirm that each surviving recommendation traces to a specific finding. Describe how you explained the cuts to the client. Use literature on your topic to show where ideas came from, and a source on evidence or consulting practice to justify the rule you applied.
How the DBAX 9104C Week 5 example is put together
The record lists eight drafts, from landed pricing in Canadian dollars to extended payment terms, and a table shows the four removed with reasons and destinations. Easy cuts come first: trade fairs and French catalogs were drawn from Leonidou and colleagues' meta-analysis, not from the study, and no buyer interviewed was in Quebec. Payment terms rested on one interview. The hard cut gets its own section: an export manager seems to answer every problem found, slow quotes, damage and unanswered emails, and Leonidou's work on small exporters' limited managerial time fits, but the study examined one firm and tested nothing about the role. Surviving recommendations are each tied to a finding, such as freight at 14 percent of export order value. The owners' question about the manager closes the record.
DBAX 9104C Week 5 rubric: what earns full marks
The cut record is graded on whether the rule was applied when it hurt. Removing ideas nobody liked proves little; removing the author's favorite, with the reason stated, shows that recommendations followed evidence. Instructors weigh the distinction between literature-supported and study-supported recommendations, because a consulting study's recommendations must rest on its own findings. Credit also goes to choosing the right destination for each cut, since an untested idea can still be useful as a future research question or an appendix note. Confirming that each survivor traces to a specific finding, with numbers, closes the loop. Describing how the cut was explained to the client earns credit when it separates evidence from the consultant's opinion, as Block recommends.
DBAX 9104C Week 5 help from the desk
The hardest part of this week is letting go of a recommendation you believe in. Ask of each draft: which finding in my study supports this, and where is it in my chapter? If the answer is a source you read or a conversation with a manager, the recommendation does not belong in the main list. Do not delete good ideas outright; move them to future research as questions or note them as untested. Check that your surviving recommendations are specific enough to test within a year. Be ready for the client to ask about the ones you cut, and separate your opinion from your findings when you answer. If deciding feels hard, our writers can work through your draft list with you against your findings.
Get a DBAX 9104C Week 5 example written to your instructions
Attach the Week 5 prompt and rubric and list your draft recommendations, marking the finding you think lies behind each. A cut record with reasons, destinations and the surviving set returns in 24-48h, free as a first sample. Its recommendations belong to an invented furniture maker, so none of the cuts are made to your list.
More DBAX 9104C papers and DBA samples
- DBAX 9104C Week 1: Two-Audience Discussion
- DBAX 9104C Week 2: Coherence Read Log
- DBAX 9104C Week 3: Two-Language Restatement
- DBAX 9104C Week 4: Recommendation Trace
- DBAX 9104C Week 6: Evidence and Action Split
- DBAX 9104C Week 7: Client Deliverable Memo
- DBAX 9104C Week 8: Disclosure Decisions
- DBAX 9104C Week 9: Independence Rehearsal
- DBAX 9104C Week 10: Two Contribution Statements
- DBAX 9104C Week 11: Final Reconciliation Record
- DBAX 9104 Week 5: Interpretation Draft
- DBAX 9103C Week 5: Supplied Records Appraisal
- DBAX 9103 Week 5: Analysis Walkthrough Paper
- DBAX 9102C Week 5: Local Transfer Verdict
DBAX 9104C Week 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DBAX 9104C Week 5 sample paper?
The full cut record, all eight draft recommendations and the reasons for each removal, can be read lower on this page free of charge.
What study does the DBAX 9104C Week 5 record come from?
A family-owned hardwood furniture maker in Indiana whose first export sales to Canada fell from 11 to 7 percent of revenue.
Why were the trade fair and French catalog ideas cut?
They came from the author's reading, not the study, and no buyer interviewed was in Quebec or mentioned trade fairs.
Why was the export manager cut if the author favored it?
The study examined one firm and never tested whether a dedicated role would change results, so it became a future research question.
Which recommendations survived?
Landed pricing in Canadian dollars, monthly truckload consolidation, better freight packaging and a dedicated order contact for buyers.