| Course | BUSI 4002 Small Business Ventures |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 5 |
| Paper type | Discussion replies |
| Length | About 390 words, 3 pages |
| Format | Discussion reply, APA 7 citations |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUSI 4002 Week 5
Week 5 Discussion: Responding to a Classmate's Feasibility Claim
Asking Two Classmates What Would Change Their Minds: A Food Truck's "Guaranteed" 120 Lunches a Day and a Car Detailing Service That Sees No Competition
Response to Jenna
Jenna, your feasibility test says the office park lunch crowd "guarantees" 120 meals a day for your food truck, based on counting about 900 cars in the lots on two Tuesdays in September. I want to push on that one claim.
Two things could make the count misleading. Tuesdays are often the busiest office day in a hybrid week, so a Monday or Friday count might be much lower. And September is mild; the truck's numbers in January, when people stay inside and order delivery, may look very different. A count taken on two good days is evidence that demand can reach 120, not that it will average 120. Kahneman and Lovallo (1993) warned that planners tend to build forecasts from the details of their own best case rather than from how similar ventures have actually performed, which is the risk a two-day count carries.
What number, counted on which days, would make you decide the office park cannot support the truck? If you set that threshold before the next count, the count becomes a real test.
Response to Omar
Omar, you concluded there is "no competition" for mobile car detailing in your suburb because a web search turned up no detailing businesses with storefronts or websites there.
I wonder if the competition is just harder to see. Many mobile detailers work through social media pages, neighborhood apps and word of mouth, with no website at all. Founders' knowledge of their markets mattered to which new firms survived in the study by Brüderl et al. (1992); in this case, knowing where competitors actually advertise may matter as much as knowing how to detail. A suburb with apparently no competition can also mean that earlier detailers tried and found too little demand; Shane and Venkataraman (2000) note that an opportunity exists only where people will pay more than the cost of serving them.
What would you expect to find if competitors did exist? You could check the neighborhood app and two or three community pages for detailing posts over the last six months. If you find several active detailers, would that change your price, your target customers or your decision to launch?
References
Brüderl, J., Preisendörfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1992). Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096207
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611
The Walden BUSI 4002 Week 5 instructions
The fifth week asks for replies that test a classmate's feasibility claim by asking what evidence would change their conclusion. Choose one identifiable claim from the classmate's post and address only that. Explain why the evidence behind it may not support it as strongly as the classmate thinks, using a counterexample, a missing condition or an outside source. Then ask the question the week is built around: what result would lead the classmate to conclude the opposite? A good version suggests how to gather that evidence. Keep the tone constructive, since the aim is a stronger test, not a defeated classmate. Replies typically run 150 to 250 words, and two are expected, each with a citation.
How the BUSI 4002 Week 5 example is put together
The reply to Jenna quotes her claim that the office park lunch crowd guarantees 120 meals a day, based on two Tuesday car counts. It points out that Tuesdays may be the busiest hybrid office day and that September weather flatters food truck traffic, then cites Kahneman and Lovallo on forecasts built from a best case. It asks what count, on which days, would make her abandon the site, and suggests setting that threshold before the next count. The reply to Omar takes up his finding of no competition from a web search, suggests that mobile detailers often advertise through social media and neighborhood apps, cites Brüderl and colleagues and Shane and Venkataraman, and asks what he would expect to find if competitors did exist and how that would change his plan.
Reading the BUSI 4002 Week 5 rubric
Replies are graded on whether they sharpen a classmate's test. Focusing on one claim earns more than a list of concerns. Graders look for a specific reason the classmate's evidence may mislead, grounded in the classmate's own details or in a credible outside source. The closing question about disconfirming evidence is required: it should ask what result would change the classmate's conclusion, ideally with a practical way to look for it. Citations should support the reasoning, for instance about optimism in forecasting or hidden competition. Tone is assessed through specificity rather than politeness alone. Replies that simply agree, give general encouragement or argue that the venture is a bad idea miss the purpose of the week.
BUSI 4002 Week 5 help from the desk
Read the classmate's feasibility claim and ask how they would know if it were false. Look for evidence gathered on unusually favorable days, from friendly sources or by a method that could miss something. Name that weakness in a sentence or two, with a source if you can. Then ask what result would make them change their mind, and suggest where they might find it. Keep each reply short. Weak replies list every problem in the post, offer advice unrelated to the claim or skip the disconfirming question. Others turn critical without offering a way forward. If you would like model replies for the feasibility claims your classmates posted, share their posts and the claims you want to address.
Get a BUSI 4002 Week 5 example written to your instructions
Paste the classmate post in question, plus the reply prompt and its rubric, and a drafted reply arrives in 24 to 48 hours, free the first time. Two replies get written as two separate arguments rather than one idea split in half. Names in anything you paste are stripped before drafting begins.
More BUSI 4002 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- BUSI 4002 Week 1: Small Business Survival Post
- BUSI 4002 Week 2: Venture Idea Opportunity Screen
- BUSI 4002 Week 3: Venture Concept Statement
- BUSI 4002 Week 4: Make-or-Break Feasibility Test
- BUSI 4002 Week 6: Business Plan Market Section
- BUSI 4002 Week 7: First-Year Startup Cost Estimate
- BUSI 4002 Week 8: Venture Risk Register
- BUSI 4002 Week 9: Startup Funding Section
- BUSI 4002 Week 10: One-Page Pitch Summary
- BUSI 4002 Week 11: Complete Venture Report
- BUSI 3016 Week 5: Figure-to-Decision Peer Replies
- BUSI 3014 Week 5: Measure Fit Peer Replies
- BUSI 3010 Week 5: Calculation Check Peer Replies
BUSI 4002 Week 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free BUSI 4002 Week 5 sample paper?
Both disconfirming-evidence replies are reproduced on this page in full and cost nothing to read.
What claims do the BUSI 4002 Week 5 replies test?
A food truck's claim that an office park guarantees 120 lunches a day, and a car detailer's claim that a suburb has no competition.
Why might the food truck count mislead?
It came from two Tuesdays in September, likely busier and milder than Mondays, Fridays or winter days.
Why might the detailer be missing competition?
Many mobile detailers advertise through social media and neighborhood apps rather than websites, so a web search would not find them.
What question does each reply end with?
What result would lead the classmate to the opposite conclusion, with a suggestion for how to look for it.