Week 1 rewards the sentence naming a discount rate and saying where it came from; the present values themselves are arithmetic any spreadsheet performs, and they persuade nobody standing alone. Searches like "wmba 6070 week 1 assignment example", "wmba6070 week 1 sample" and "wmba 6070 week 1 example" land here.
What a finished WMBA 6070 Week 1 present value comparison looks like
On screen the deliverable runs two to three pages plus an appendix. A title page sits first, then a short framing paragraph naming the firm, the amount in question, and the three schedules under consideration. A table follows with one row per period and one column per option, the undiscounted amounts on top and the discounted figures beneath them, with a present value total in the last row of each column. Under the table sits an assumptions block of four or five lines: the rate used, its source, whether payments fall at the beginning or the end of each period, and any tax effect deliberately left out. The recommendation appears as its own short paragraph naming one schedule. Formulas and spreadsheet extracts sit in the appendix rather than in the body.
How a WMBA 6070 Week 1 example is structured
Assembly starts at the table, not at the prose. The cash flows for each option are laid out on a shared timeline first, so that a schedule paying across years two through six can be read against one that settles in full at signing. Only after every option carries a total does the writing begin, and it begins from the ranking rather than from the definitions. The framing paragraph gets whatever background the ranking needs and no more, which is why finished versions rarely explain what discounting is; the audience is a manager and the tool is assumed. The assumptions block is composed last, once the writer knows which assumption did the heaviest work, and it lists that one first. The appendix carries whatever a reader would need to rebuild the totals, keyed to the table by option letter.
Three schedules on one timeline
The table places every option against the same set of periods, so an option paying across years two through six can be read beside one that settles at signing. Empty cells stay visible rather than collapsed, which is what lets a reader see that the schedules differ in shape and not only in total.
The rate arrives with a source
One line of the assumptions block gives the discount rate and where it came from: the borrowing cost stated in the scenario, a yield quoted in the case exhibit, or a figure from the assigned chapter with a page reference. The same number is used unchanged across all three columns, and the document says so.
An assumptions block that ranks itself
Four or five assumptions sit below the table, and the one carrying the most weight is listed first rather than in the order it occurred to the writer. Timing conventions belong here too, since whether payments fall at the start or the end of a period moves the totals enough to overturn a close ranking.
One schedule named, not weighed
The recommendation paragraph names a single option and gives the margin between it and the runner-up in dollars. Finished versions resist the balanced closing that lists advantages on both sides, because the scenario asked which contract to sign and a tidy list of tradeoffs answers a different question.
Totals a reader can rebuild
The appendix carries the formula or the spreadsheet extract for at least one column, keyed to the table by option letter. Graders in most sections recompute one figure at random, and a total that cannot be traced back to its inputs is treated as unsupported even when it happens to be right.
Where marks go in WMBA 6070 Week 1
Credit in this opening week clusters in two places, and neither one of them is the arithmetic itself. The first is the rate: sections award the largest single share to a discount rate that is named, sourced to something in the scenario or the readings, and applied consistently across every option. A rate appearing without explanation drags the whole comparison down even when every total is correct. The second is the shared date. Options measured at different points in time score as incomplete however neat the table looks. Smaller shares go to the recommendation, which has to name a schedule rather than describe a tension, and to the visible work, since graders in most sections want to reproduce one total and deduct where they cannot.
Get a WMBA 6070 Week 1 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 1 problem set with whatever rubric your section published, plus any rate table the scenario carries, and a worked comparison comes back in 24 to 48 hours, the first one free. If an Excel file is expected alongside the write-up, mention it and the sample arrives with live formulas in the cells.
WMBA 6070 Week 1 questions, answered
Does the comparison have to be built in Excel?
Most sections accept either, though a spreadsheet is the safer default because it lets a grader change the rate and watch the ranking respond. Where a template is posted, it is graded as given, cells included, so the file that comes back to your instructor should be that one. A hand-built table pasted into a document passes when the working is shown beneath it.
Which rate applies when the prompt supplies none?
Sections leaving the rate open expect one to be chosen and defended, usually the firm's stated borrowing cost, a rate from the assigned reading, or a market yield attributed to a source. A figure that arrives without provenance is the version that bleeds marks. Naming the rate, giving its source in a clause, and noting the threshold above which the ranking would change covers the requirement in most classrooms.
Is a first-week problem set graded on the writing?
Partly, and more than most people expect. The computation rows are usually a minority of the total, with the rest sitting on the framing paragraph, the assumptions, and the recommendation. Submissions carrying a correct table and three sentences tend to land mid-range, because the criteria asking for interpretation have nothing to read.