| Course | WMBA 6050 Accounting for Management Decision Making |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 4 |
| Paper type | Budget defense |
| Length | About 1,030 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Business Administration (MBA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for WMBA 6050 Week 4
A $5.04 Million Season Built From Rounds Up and Defended Line by Line: Next Year's Operating and Cash Budget for a Golf Club, Written for an Owner Who Expects to Say No
Student Name
Walden University
WMBA 6050: Accounting for Management Decision Making
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
A $5.04 Million Season Built From Rounds Up and Defended Line by Line: Next Year's Operating and Cash Budget for a Golf Club, Written for an Owner Who Expects to Say No
The Reader and the Approach
The owner of Briar Hollow, an invented course with a restaurant and banquet hall, has rejected the last two budgets the managers proposed, both times for the same reason: the growth figures were optimistic and nobody could say what would happen if they were wrong. This budget is built for that reader. The numbers are assembled in the usual order, from volume to revenue to costs to cash, but most of this paper defends the assumptions that drive them and shows what happens when the most important one fails.
Budgets remain the main planning tool in most organizations. A survey of North American companies found that very few intended to abandon budgeting, though many were changing how they used it, often by relying less on fixed targets and more on forecasts that could be revised (Libby & Lindsay, 2010). This budget follows that spirit: it gives a plan, the reasons behind it and the trigger for revising it.
Revenue: Built From Volume
Table 1
Revenue Budget With the Assumption Behind Each Line
| Line | Last season | Next season | Assumption | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green and cart fees | $2,160,000 | $2,281,000 | 32,400 rounds (+2.9%) at $70.40 average (+2.6%) | |
| Season passes | $420,000 | $440,000 | Same number of passes, price up 5% | |
| Restaurant | $1,180,000 | $1,210,000 | Covers flat, check average up 2.5% | |
| Banquets | $760,000 | $791,000 | 92 events at $8,600 average; 71 already booked | |
| Pro shop | $310,000 | $320,000 | Tracks rounds | |
| Total | $4,830,000 | $5,042,000 | Growth of 4.4% | |
All figures are composite.
The two growth assumptions that matter most are rounds and banquets. Rounds grew 2.3 percent last season and 1.9 percent the season before, so 2.9 percent is above trend. The case for it is that the club will add a twilight rate on weekdays after 4 p.m., aimed at players who now go to a nine-hole course nearby, and that last year lost about 900 rounds to an unusually wet May. If May weather is normal, the recovered rounds alone account for most of the increase. The price increase of 2.6 percent is smaller than last year's 4.6 percent, which is deliberate after a season in which the club raised prices without losing volume but is now above most competitors on weekend mornings.
The banquet figure is better supported than it looks. Seventy-one of the 92 events are already under contract with deposits, so 77 percent of banquet revenue is booked before the season begins. The remaining 21 events assume the same late-booking pattern as last year, when 23 events were booked after January.
Costs
Course costs follow the fixed and variable split developed in Week 3, using the standard approach to cost behavior (Garrison et al., 2021): about $14.65 per round in variable cost and $155,170 a month in fixed cost while open, with fixed costs rising 3 percent for wages. Food and beverage costs are budgeted at 32 percent of restaurant and banquet sales, the same as last season, although the revised banquet price list should bring that down. Depreciation rises by about $40,000 as the first irrigation phase enters service.
Table 2
Budgeted Operating Results
| Line | Next season | |
|---|---|
| Revenue | $5,042,000 | |
| Course variable costs | $475,000 | |
| Course fixed costs, including closed months | $1,345,000 | |
| Food and beverage costs and department payroll | $1,280,000 | |
| Pro shop cost of goods | $198,000 | |
| Utilities, insurance, property tax, marketing and administration | $765,000 | |
| Depreciation | $380,000 | |
| Operating income | $599,000 (11.9% of revenue) | |
| Interest, including the new irrigation loan for half a year | $189,000 | |
| Income before distributions | $410,000 | |
Composite figures; the club is a pass-through entity and pays no income tax itself.
Cash, Quarter by Quarter
The cash budget matters more than the income budget this year, because the Week 2 memo showed the club's cash no longer covers customer deposits and near-term bills. The budget assumes the remaining irrigation work is financed with a $1.2 million term loan drawn in two parts, so the project no longer draws on operating cash.
Table 3
Cash Budget by Quarter
| Quarter | Cash in | Cash out | Ending cash | |
|---|---|---|---|
| January to March | $420,000 (pass sales, new deposits) | $380,000 (closed-season costs, debt service) | $560,000 | |
| April to June | $1,930,000 | $1,522,000 | $968,000 | |
| July to September | $2,383,000 | $1,708,000 | $1,643,000 | |
| October to December | $519,000 | $842,000 (including a $150,000 distribution) | $1,320,000 | |
Starts from $520,000 of cash; loan draws and irrigation payments offset each other and are excluded; composite figures.
At year end, cash of about $1.32 million would exceed customer deposits, expected to be about $500,000, by a wide margin. That is the budget's most important result for the owner: it restores the cushion the club lost last year.
What Happens When the First Assumption Is Wrong
The owner will ask what happens if rounds do not grow. Suppose rounds stay at last season's 31,500 and May is as wet as last year, costing another 900 rounds, so the club plays 30,600 instead of 32,400. At the budgeted price, each lost round removes about $55.75 of contribution, so 1,800 fewer rounds reduce operating income by about $100,000, to roughly $499,000. Suppose also that no banquets are booked beyond the 71 already contracted. The 21 missing events would remove about $181,000 of revenue and, after food and variable labor, about $95,000 of contribution. Both together reduce operating income to about $404,000, roughly $150,000 below last season's $557,000, and income after interest to about $215,000. Year-end cash would fall by a similar amount but would still exceed deposits.
The Revision Trigger
The budget includes one trigger. If rounds through May 31 are more than 8 percent below plan, the general manager will present a revised forecast in the first week of June, with spending cuts listed in advance: delayed equipment purchases, reduced seasonal hours in the pro shop and a pause on the planned patio furniture. Datar and Rajan (2021) describe a flexible budget as one that adjusts for actual volume, and the June review will compare results against that standard rather than against the original totals.
References
Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2021). Horngren's cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (17th ed.). Pearson.
Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2021). Managerial accounting (17th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Libby, T., & Lindsay, R. M. (2010). Beyond budgeting or budgeting reconsidered? A survey of North-American budgeting practice. Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.10.003
Reading the WMBA 6050 Week 4 instructions
Budget assignments in managerial accounting usually ask students to build a master budget, typically sales through cash, and to defend it to a skeptical reader. Prompts commonly name that reader, such as an owner or board that intends to say no, and place most of the grade on the defense: the assumptions behind each line, why growth figures are what they are and what happens when the first assumption is optimistic. Instructors expect the numbers to tie together from volume to cash. Budgets in this course usually come with two or three tables. Many prompts also ask how the budget will be revised during the year. A sensitivity case that shows the downside in dollars, rather than a promise that the plan is conservative, tends to persuade skeptical readers best.
Inside the WMBA 6050 Week 4 example
The paper opens by naming the reader and the reason earlier budgets failed, then cites Libby and Lindsay's survey on how budgeting is changing. A revenue table lists each line with last season's figure, next season's and the assumption. Paragraphs defend the two key assumptions, rounds growth and banquet bookings, with trend data and the share already contracted. A cost section uses the Week 3 split, citing Garrison and colleagues, and a second table gives budgeted operating results through income before distributions. A quarterly cash table shows how a term loan for irrigation restores the cushion over deposits. A section breaks the first assumption deliberately, pricing flat rounds and missing banquets together. A revision trigger for June closes the paper with Datar and Rajan on flexible budgets. Margin comments flag the revenue table, the downside case and the trigger.
Where the marks sit in the WMBA 6050 Week 4 rubric
Graders reward a budget whose figures tie together from volume to revenue to costs to cash. Defending each assumption with evidence, such as trend data or signed contracts, carries the most weight. Showing what happens when the most important assumption fails, priced in contribution and cash, demonstrates honesty and analytic skill. A cash budget that addresses a known risk, here deposits not covered by cash, connects the budget to earlier findings. A revision trigger with specific responses shows the budget will be managed, not just filed. Instructors also expect a register suited to a skeptical reader: direct, numerical and without salesmanship. Consistent tables and properly cited sources make up what remains of the grade.
WMBA 6050 Week 4 help: mistakes that cost marks
Start with volume and build every revenue line from it, writing the assumption next to each figure. For costs, use the fixed and variable split you developed earlier. Then build cash by period, including timing differences such as deposits received before events. Identify the assumption that matters most and break it on purpose: what happens to income and cash if it is wrong? Students often lose marks by presenting totals without assumptions, or by calling growth figures conservative without evidence. Another common gap is an income budget with no cash budget. Add a trigger that would prompt a mid-year revision. Write for the reader who is looking for reasons to say no. If you would like a custom sample budget defense for your own organization, send us last year's figures.
Get a WMBA 6050 Week 4 example written to your instructions
Send the budget assignment with its data file and rubric and a sample, schedules plus written defense, comes back in 24-48 hours at no cost the first time. Note whether your section grades the Excel workbook itself, since a graded workbook needs visible formulas rather than pasted values.
More WMBA 6050 papers and MBA samples
- WMBA 6050 Week 1: Three Statements Post
- WMBA 6050 Week 2: Ratio Analysis Memo
- WMBA 6050 Week 3: Cost-Volume-Profit Workup
- WMBA 6050 Week 5: Flexible Budget Variance Report
- WMBA 6050 Week 6: Golf Club Balanced Scorecard
- WMBA 6050 Week 7: Tournament Buyout Decision
- WMBA 6050 Week 8: Corrected Analysis and Reflection
- WMBA 6060 Week 4: Positioning Claim and Defense
- WMBA 6040 Week 4: Pareto Remake Analysis
- WMBA 6030 Week 4: Online Channel Unit Economics
- WMBA 6020 Week 4: Better Place Failure Analysis
WMBA 6050 Week 4 questions, answered
Where can I find a free WMBA 6050 Week 4 sample paper?
This page reproduces the full operating and cash budget for a golf club, defense included.
What revenue does the budget plan?
About $5.04 million, built from 32,400 rounds and 92 banquets.
How well supported is the banquet figure?
Seventy-one of the 92 events are already under contract with deposits.
What happens if rounds stay flat and no new banquets are booked?
Operating income falls to about $404,000, and year-end cash still exceeds deposits.
When would the budget be revised?
If rounds through May 31 are more than 8 percent below plan.