Built so a stranger could rebuild the case alone, this source list example from PUBH 8501, Week 11, pairs every reference with its claim, retrieval route and access status. Searches like "pubh 8501 week 11 assignment example", "pubh8501 week 11 sample" and "pubh 8501 week 11 example" land here.
What a finished PUBH 8501 Week 11 source list looks like
Two parts make up the finished list. The first is an ordinary reference list in current APA style, alphabetized, covering the federal testing guidance, the published care cascade analyses, the state surveillance summary, a methods source on de-identification, Schon on problem setting and the record-matching account used in the counter-evidence check. The second part is a claim map, a table holding a row for each source. Columns record which sentence of the problem statement the source supports, how a stranger would retrieve it, whether it is open, library-licensed or internal to the clinic, and the date the link or route was last verified. Internal sources appear by description only, such as the clinic's laboratory order log, with a note that access requires the clinic's permission. Two claims resting on a single source each are flagged at the end for strengthening.
How a PUBH 8501 Week 11 example is structured
Keeping the standard reference list intact and adding the claim map beside it respects formatting expectations while doing the work the week asks for. The map is organized by the order of claims in the problem statement, not alphabetically, so a reader can walk the argument from start to finish and check each step. Retrieval routes are written as instructions a stranger could follow, library database, public web page, written request, because a citation alone does not tell someone without institutional access where to go. Access status is a separate column because it determines whether a claim is checkable at all by an outside reader. The last-verified date turns the list into a maintained document rather than a snapshot. Flagging claims that rest on one source is placed at the end, as an honest inventory of where the case is thinnest.
Reference list, unaltered
A standard alphabetized list in current APA style, so the formatting criterion is met before anything is added.
Claims in argument order
A map pairing each problem-statement sentence with its source, ordered as the argument runs rather than by author.
Routes a stranger could follow
Database, public page or written request, stated as a practical path for someone without the author's access.
Open, licensed or internal
Access status for every source, with internal clinic records described but not reproduced.
Thin places, admitted
Two claims supported by a single source each, named at the end as the places most in need of reinforcement.
Where marks go in PUBH 8501 Week 11
Checkability by a stranger is the standard, and faculty test it literally by picking a claim and trying to follow the list to its source. The claim map earns most of the credit because it makes that test easy; a bare reference list leaves the reader to guess which source supports which sentence. APA accuracy still carries a real share, since a malformed entry breaks the retrieval chain the list exists to provide. Access status is rewarded for honesty about what an outsider can verify. The closing inventory of thin places draws credit that a confident list would forfeit. Deductions follow secondary summaries cited where originals are available, sources that support no sentence in the statement, and internal records presented as though anyone could consult them.
Get a PUBH 8501 Week 11 example written to your instructions
Send your reference list as it stands, your problem statement, and the Week 11 instructions with the rubric. The list comes back formatted, with a claim map in argument order, retrieval routes and access status for each entry. Your opening request costs nothing, returned within 24 to 48 hours; the internal records named above belong to no actual clinic.
PUBH 8501 Week 11 questions, answered
Is a claim map part of APA style?
No. APA governs the reference list and in-text citations, and the example keeps that list intact. The claim map is an added table that shows which source supports which sentence. If your rubric only asks for a reference list, the map still helps you check your own statement before submission, even if you keep it out of the graded file.
How should internal workplace records be listed?
Usually by description rather than as formal references, with a note that access requires permission. APA treats unpublished internal documents differently from published sources, and your program may have its own rule. The example describes the clinic's laboratory order log in words and marks it internal, so the reader knows the claim cannot be checked from outside.
Why flag claims that rest on one source?
Because a reader will find them anyway, and flagging them shows you did. A single-source claim is not wrong, but it is fragile if that source is challenged. Naming the two thinnest points at the end tells the next course where to look first, and it signals the kind of self-scrutiny a committee expects.