| Course | PUBH 3100 Human Disease and Prevention |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 11 |
| Paper type | Final condition report |
| Length | About 1,010 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Public Health |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PUBH 3100 Week 11
A Defect That Forms Before Most Pregnancies Are Known: A Final Condition Report on Neural Tube Defects, Their Mechanism and Course, and a Defense of Mandatory Folic Acid Fortification Against Its Two Most Common Objections
Student Name
Walden University
PUBH 3100: Human Disease and Prevention
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
A Defect That Forms Before Most Pregnancies Are Known: A Final Condition Report on Neural Tube Defects, Their Mechanism and Course, and a Defense of Mandatory Folic Acid Fortification Against Its Two Most Common Objections
Purpose
This report has two parts. The first describes neural tube defects, a set of grave malformations of the developing brain and spinal cord: what they are, how they arise and what happens to affected pregnancies and children. The second defends one population-level action, mandatory fortification of grain products with folic acid, against the two objections most often raised against it. The description supplies the reason for the defense: the defect forms so early in pregnancy that measures aimed at individual pregnant women arrive too late for many.
Part One: The Condition
What Neural Tube Defects Are
The neural tube is the structure in an embryo that becomes the brain and spinal cord. It forms as a flat plate of tissue that folds and closes into a tube during the first month after conception, usually by about 28 days. When part of the tube fails to close, the result is a neural tube defect. Failure at the head end causes anencephaly, in which much of the brain and skull do not develop. Failure lower down causes spina bifida, in which part of the spinal cord and its coverings are exposed or protrude through an opening in the spine.
The Mechanism as Understood
Closure of the neural tube requires rapid cell division and DNA synthesis, which depend on folate, a B vitamin. Low folate status around conception is associated with a higher risk of defects, and genetic differences in how the body handles folate add to risk. The full mechanism is not known; other factors, including some medications and maternal diabetes, also raise risk. The firmest evidence that folate matters comes from a randomized trial: among women who had previously had an affected pregnancy, folic acid supplements taken before conception and in early pregnancy reduced the risk of a recurrence by about 72% (MRC Vitamin Study Research Group, 1991).
The Course
Anencephaly is fatal before or shortly after birth. Spina bifida varies in severity. Many children survive with surgery but live with lifelong effects that can include leg weakness or paralysis, bladder and bowel problems and fluid buildup in the brain requiring a shunt. Many affected pregnancies end in miscarriage or termination, which means counts of affected live births understate how often defects occur. Surveillance systems that rely on birth certificates alone miss a large share of cases, a limitation that also affects the fortification evidence discussed below.
Why Timing Matters
Because closure is complete by about four weeks after conception, roughly two weeks after a first missed period, a woman may not yet know she is pregnant when the critical period ends. Nearly half of U.S. pregnancies, 45% in 2011, were unintended (Finer & Zolna, 2016), so advice to start supplements after a positive pregnancy test comes too late for many. That fact is the starting point for a population approach.
Part Two: The Action and Its Defense
The Action
Since 1998, the United States has required that enriched cereal grain products, such as flour, bread and pasta, include folic acid. The measure reaches women of childbearing age whether or not they plan a pregnancy or take supplements. Once fortification began, neural tube defects noted on birth certificates dropped by 19%, from 37.8 per 100,000 live births before fortification to 30.5 after it (Honein et al., 2001). Because this was a before-and-after comparison, other changes could contribute, and birth certificates miss many affected pregnancies, but the decline began with pregnancies conceived after fortification took effect.
Objection One: Fortification Could Mask Vitamin B12 Deficiency
The concern is that high folic acid intake can correct the anemia caused by vitamin B12 deficiency while the nerve damage from that deficiency continues, delaying diagnosis, particularly in older adults. A study of patients with low vitamin B12 levels found that the proportion without anemia did not increase from before fortification, 39.2%, to after it, 37.6%, including among patients over 60 (Mills et al., 2003). The concern was reasonable before fortification began, because folic acid at high doses can correct the blood changes of B12 deficiency; the evidence since then has not shown the masking effect at the levels added to food.
Objection Two: Individual Supplements Are Enough
The second objection is that women can take folic acid supplements and that adding it to everyone's food is unnecessary. The timing of neural tube closure answers this objection. Supplements protect women who take them before conception, but many pregnancies are not planned, and daily pill-taking is easy to miss. Fortification reaches women who would not otherwise be protected during the weeks that matter. Fortification also does not depend on remembering a daily pill, which matters for a protection needed at a time many women do not know they need it. Supplements and fortification are complements, not alternatives: supplements remain recommended, and fortification covers the gap.
What Fortification Does Not Do
Fortification does not prevent all neural tube defects. Some defects arise from causes unrelated to folate, and the decline after fortification, while substantial, left most affected pregnancies unprevented. Fortification also reaches only people who eat enriched grain products. Corn masa flour, used widely in some Hispanic diets in the United States, was not part of the original requirement, and voluntary fortification of corn masa was permitted only in 2016. A defense of fortification should therefore be honest about its reach: it is a broad floor of protection, not a complete solution, and gaps in the food supply can leave some groups less protected than others.
Summary
Neural tube defects arise when the neural tube fails to close in the first month after conception, often before pregnancy is recognized. Folic acid reduces risk, as shown by a randomized trial, and mandatory fortification reaches women regardless of planning. The two main objections, masking of vitamin B12 deficiency and the sufficiency of supplements, are answered by evidence on masking and by the timing of the defect.
References
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011. The New England Journal of Medicine, 374(9), 843-852. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575
Honein, M. A., Paulozzi, L. J., Mathews, T. J., Erickson, J. D., & Wong, L.-Y. C. (2001). Impact of folic acid fortification of the US food supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA, 285(23), 2981-2986. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.23.2981
Mills, J. L., Von Kohorn, I., Conley, M. R., Zeller, J. A., Cox, C., Williamson, R. E., & Dufour, D. R. (2003). Low vitamin B-12 concentrations in patients without anemia: The effect of folic acid fortification of grain. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 77(6), 1474-1477. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/77.6.1474
MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. (1991). Prevention of neural tube defects: Results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. The Lancet, 338(8760), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)90133-A
The Walden PUBH 3100 Week 11 instructions
Final condition reports ask students to combine description and argument: explain a condition's mechanism and course, then defend a population-level action against objections. Instructors look for accurate biology in plain language, a clear link between the description and the chosen action and objections stated fairly and answered with evidence. A paper of several pages with headings for each part is common. Students should cite a trial or strong study for the action's effect, population data on its impact and evidence on each objection. Many prompts also ask students to state what the action does not achieve, so the defense does not overclaim. Students should also state where data on the condition are incomplete, such as defects missed by birth certificates.
Inside the PUBH 3100 Week 11 example
The report states its two-part purpose and how the description supports the argument. Part one explains what neural tube defects are, the role of folate with a randomized recurrence trial, the course of anencephaly and spina bifida and why timing matters, citing data on unintended pregnancy. Part two describes U.S. fortification and its measured impact, then answers the masking objection with a study of vitamin B12 levels and the supplements objection with the timing of closure. A section on what fortification does not do covers causes unrelated to folate and gaps such as corn masa. A summary closes the report. Margin notes point to the link between the two parts and to the evidence used against each objection.
Reading the PUBH 3100 Week 11 rubric
Final reports are graded on accuracy, integration, argument and candor. Accuracy credit comes from correct biology, timing and outcomes, explained in plain words. Integration credit comes from using the timing of neural tube closure to motivate a population approach, linking the two halves. Argument credit, the largest share, comes from stating each objection fairly and answering it with a specific study. Candor credit comes from the section on what fortification does not achieve, including gaps in the food supply. Population data on impact, with the limits of birth certificate counts, show careful reading. Citations and format complete the scoring. Reports that defend an action without acknowledging its gaps tend to lose candor marks.
PUBH 3100 Week 11 help from the desk
Final reports often treat the description and the argument as separate assignments. Choose a fact from your description, such as timing or who is affected, that explains why your action must work at the population level. State each objection in its strongest form and answer it with evidence, not reassurance. Report both the effect of the action and its limits. Note weaknesses in the data, such as missed cases. Keep the biology in plain language. Close with what the action does not do. A first final report on the condition you choose can be drafted for you free.
Get a PUBH 3100 Week 11 example written to your instructions
Send over the Week 11 prompt, its full rubric, and any topic that already got approval during the term, and the report gets built to that specification with the same integration between halves. Your first custom sample is free and comes back in 24-48 hours. Length, reference minimum and the heading scheme all follow the prompt rather than this example.
More PUBH 3100 papers and BS in Public Health samples
- PUBH 3100 Week 1: Terminology Post
- PUBH 3100 Week 2: Body System Brief
- PUBH 3100 Week 3: Mechanism Explainer
- PUBH 3100 Week 4: Natural History Profile
- PUBH 3100 Week 5: Screening Rationale
- PUBH 3100 Week 6: Prevention Argument
- PUBH 3100 Week 7: Chronic Condition Paper
- PUBH 3100 Week 8: Infectious Condition Paper
- PUBH 3100 Week 9: Peer Replies
- PUBH 3100 Week 10: Risk Factor Appraisal
- PUBH 4000 Week 11: Education Package
- PUBH 1000 Week 11: Final Field Paper
- PUBH 4030 Week 11: Program Plan
- HLTH 4530 Week 11: Population Choice Paper
PUBH 3100 Week 11 questions, answered
Where can I find a free PUBH 3100 Week 11 sample paper?
This page includes the full Week 11 final condition report on neural tube defects and folic acid fortification, with each objection answered from evidence.
When does the neural tube close?
Typically within four weeks of conception, frequently before the pregnancy has been recognized.
Does folic acid prevent neural tube defects?
A randomized trial found that folic acid supplements reduced recurrence by about 72% among women with a previous affected pregnancy.
How much did fortification reduce neural tube defects in the United States?
Recorded birth prevalence fell by 19% after mandatory fortification, from 37.8 to 30.5 per 100,000 live births.
Does folic acid fortification hide vitamin B12 deficiency?
A study of patients with low B12 found no increase after fortification in the share without anemia, the pattern masking would produce.