Deliberately narrow, the claim defended by this argument memo example, set for PHLT 8006 Week 7, says beverage taxes cut purchases of taxed drinks and stops short of body weight. Searches like "phlt 8006 week 7 assignment example", "phlt8006 week 7 sample" and "phlt 8006 week 7 example" land here.
What a finished PHLT 8006 Week 7 argument memo looks like
Running two and a half pages under memo headings, the piece states its claim in the first sentence under the subject line and never restates it more broadly. The layout follows Booth, Colomb and Williams' The Craft of Research, which treats an argument as a claim supported by reasons, reasons supported by evidence, and the whole answered against a reader's likely objections. Three reasons appear as bold run-in heads: comparison-city designs consistently show lower sales, the declines appear across different cities and store types, and cross-border buying offsets only part of the decline. Each reason carries two or three cited studies. An acknowledgment section then states the strongest objection, that intake evidence is weak, and the response concedes it, which is why the claim stops at purchases. The last sentence names what would widen it.
How a PHLT 8006 Week 7 example is structured
Claim first, then reasons, then objection is the ordering the source model prescribes, and the memo follows it because the reader of an argument memo needs to know what is being defended before weighing anything offered in support. The three reasons are sequenced from strongest to most qualified, so confidence decreases in a way the reader can track instead of fluctuating from paragraph to paragraph. Evidence sits directly under the reason it supports rather than in a pooled literature section, which lets faculty check each link separately. The acknowledgment section comes late but not last. Its placement lets the objection meet an argument already built, and the response then explains why the claim was drawn where it was. Ending on what would widen the claim leaves the memo open to the synthesis and position paper that follow.
The claim, stated once
Beverage taxes reduce purchases of taxed drinks in the taxing city; body weight is outside the claim. The sentence opens the memo and is never quietly enlarged later.
Three reasons, strongest first
Consistent comparison-city results, declines across settings and only partial offset from cross-border buying. Each is a sentence the evidence beneath it must earn.
Evidence under each reason
Two or three studies sit directly below the reason they support, so a reader can test one link at a time without hunting through a general review.
The objection conceded
Weak intake evidence is stated as the strongest counterpoint. The response grants it and shows that the claim was drawn narrow precisely to stay inside what is known.
What would widen it
One closing sentence names the study, tracking intake and weight in a taxed population, that would let the claim reach further.
Where marks go in PHLT 8006 Week 7
Nearly everything in this memo turns on a balance: a claim small enough to survive its evidence yet large enough to matter. A claim that beverage taxes improve population health reaches past the evidence and draws the margin comment every doctoral reader writes; a claim that one city's sales fell is defensible but trivial. Credit goes to the calibrated middle. The reasoning portion rewards visible links between each reason and its evidence, which is why the memo keeps them together. Handling of the objection earns a distinct share: conceding a real weakness and adjusting the claim scores higher than rebutting a feeble one. Memos slip when the claim broadens in the conclusion, when reasons are really restatements of the claim, or when evidence arrives in a pooled paragraph no reader can map onto the reasons.
Get a PHLT 8006 Week 7 example written to your instructions
Describe the claim you are considering and paste the Week 7 prompt and rubric. Your claim becomes the memo's spine, narrowed where the evidence demands it. First sample at no charge, back in 24 to 48 hours; if the claim needs shrinking, the sample shows exactly where and why before you decide.
PHLT 8006 Week 7 questions, answered
Is The Craft of Research required for this memo?
Not usually. The example borrows its model because the claim, reasons, evidence and response pattern fits an argument memo naturally, and it gives faculty a structure they recognize. Your instructor may assign a different framework or none. Whatever your prompt names is what the sample uses, and the claim is still stated first either way.
Why make the claim smaller than the author wanted?
Because a memo is graded on whether its claim survives the evidence offered for it. The author's original instinct, that taxes improve health, could not be supported by what the studies measured. Narrowing the claim to purchases lets every reason hold, and the memo says openly what a wider claim would need, a sign of judgment and not of timidity.
Can an argument memo cite the same studies as last week's table?
It usually should. The evidence table sorted and rated those studies; the memo puts them to work in support of a single claim. Reusing them shows continuity across the course's sequence of assignments. What changes is the role each study plays, from a row being assessed to evidence carrying one specific reason toward the claim.