NURS 6521 Week 3 Cardiovascular Drug Therapy Plan Example

Advanced Pharmacology Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This NURS 6521 Week 3 cardiovascular drug therapy plan example chooses an antihypertensive class for Mrs. D.O., a composite 62-year-old African American woman with hypertension, type 2 diabetes and stage G3a chronic kidney disease with rising albuminuria, whose home blood pressure averages 148/92 on amlodipine. Lisinopril was stopped three years ago for a dry cough. The plan compares classes, including an ACE inhibitor, an angiotensin receptor blocker, a thiazide-type diuretic and an SGLT2 inhibitor for kidney protection, chooses an angiotensin receptor blocker because it lowers albuminuria without the bradykinin-driven cough, and considers age, genetics, ethnicity and behavior. Education and follow-up close the plan. Walden NURS 6521, Advanced Pharmacology, judges MSN justification by its connection to the patient. References include the KDIGO 2024 CKD guideline, the ACC/AHA 2017 blood pressure guideline and Rosendorff on ACE inhibitor cough.

CourseNURS 6521 Advanced Pharmacology
WeekWeek 3
Paper typeCardiovascular drug therapy plan
LengthAbout 1,180 words, 7 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramMaster of Science in Nursing (MSN)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 6521 Week 3

1

Choosing an Antihypertensive Class for a 62-Year-Old Woman With Albuminuric Chronic Kidney Disease and a History of ACE Inhibitor Cough

Student Name

College of Nursing, Walden University

NURS 6521: Advanced Pharmacology

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title carries the two facts that decide the plan: albuminuria and the earlier cough. A reader who sees both on the title page can predict the class that will be chosen, which is the point; the paper's job is to show that the choice follows from the patient rather than from a guideline table.
2

Choosing an Antihypertensive Class for a 62-Year-Old Woman With Albuminuric Chronic Kidney Disease and a History of ACE Inhibitor Cough

Patient Summary

Mrs. D.O. is a composite patient invented for this plan. She is a 62-year-old African American woman, a retired postal clerk, with hypertension for 14 years, type 2 diabetes for nine years, and chronic kidney disease stage G3a with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 54 mL/min/1.73 m2, stable over two years. Her urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio has risen from 90 mg/g to 380 mg/g over the same period. Potassium is 4.6 mmol/L. Her average home blood pressure over two weeks is 148/92 on amlodipine 5 mg daily. She also takes metformin and atorvastatin. Lisinopril was stopped three years ago after she developed a persistent dry cough that resolved within a month of discontinuation. She uses naproxen several times a week for knee pain and salts her food at the table.

Options Compared

Three classes are realistic next steps. The comparison below lists, for each, its mechanism, its effect on the kidney, and its main risk for this patient.

Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), for example losartan. Mechanism: blocks the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, reducing vasoconstriction, aldosterone release, and sodium retention. Kidney effect: relaxes the efferent arteriole preferentially, lowering intraglomerular pressure and reducing albumin leakage. Main risk here: hyperkalemia and an early rise in creatinine, both monitored.

Thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic, for example chlorthalidone. Mechanism: inhibits the sodium-chloride cotransporter in the distal convoluted tubule, reducing sodium reabsorption and plasma volume. Kidney effect: lowers systemic pressure but has no specific effect on glomerular pressure or albuminuria. Main risk here: hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and increases in glucose and uric acid.

Dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, dose increase of amlodipine. Mechanism: blocks L-type calcium channels in vascular smooth muscle, dilating arterioles. Kidney effect: dilates the afferent arteriole, which can transmit more systemic pressure into the glomerulus and does not reduce albuminuria on its own. Main risk here: ankle edema, which increases with dose.

The Choice

The plan adds an ARB, losartan 25 mg daily, increased to 50 mg and then as tolerated toward 100 mg, while continuing amlodipine. The choice answers two documented findings rather than a general preference.

First, her albuminuria. Blocking angiotensin II at its receptor relaxes the efferent arteriole, which lowers the pressure inside the glomerulus and reduces the protein that leaks through the damaged filtration barrier. Lower intraglomerular pressure slows progression of albuminuric kidney disease independent of the fall in systemic blood pressure. The KDIGO guideline recommends starting a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, an ACE inhibitor or an ARB, for patients with high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, and moderately to severely increased albuminuria, and titrating it to the highest approved dose that is tolerated (Cheung et al., 2021).

Second, her earlier cough. ACE inhibitors block the enzyme that converts angiotensin I to angiotensin II, and the same enzyme breaks down bradykinin. Accumulated bradykinin and related peptides in the airway are the leading explanation for the dry cough ACE inhibitors cause. ARBs act at the receptor instead and leave bradykinin breakdown intact, so cough is much less common, and switching to an ARB is the standard response when an ACE inhibitor causes it (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2021). Restarting lisinopril would likely bring the cough back.

Why not the others first? A thiazide would lower her blood pressure but would not address the albuminuria, and it adds metabolic risks in a woman with diabetes; it remains a reasonable third agent if pressure stays above target. Increasing amlodipine would also lower pressure, but by dilating the afferent arteriole it can raise glomerular pressure unless an agent acting on the efferent side is present, and her risk of edema rises with the dose. Combining an ACE inhibitor with an ARB is not an option, since dual blockade increases hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury without improving outcomes (Cheung et al., 2021).

What this page is doingThe comparison precedes the decision, and the rejected classes are treated fairly before the chosen one is argued. Each reason for the ARB answers something documented in this patient: albuminuria explains the class, and the earlier cough explains the ARB rather than an ACE inhibitor. Explaining why the thiazide was not first is where many plans lose the justification marks this paper collects.
3

Patient Factors

Age

At 62 she is not at the age where orthostatic hypotension typically limits therapy, but reduced renal reserve means the rise in creatinine that often follows ARB initiation must be interpreted with care. A rise of up to about 30 percent in the first weeks reflects the intended fall in glomerular pressure and is not a reason to stop; a larger rise suggests volume depletion or renal artery stenosis and is investigated.

Genetics

Losartan is a prodrug in part: CYP2C9 converts it to an active carboxylic acid metabolite responsible for much of its effect. People who carry reduced-function CYP2C9 variants form less of the active metabolite and may respond less (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2021). If her blood pressure responds poorly at an adequate dose, that is one reason to consider an ARB that does not depend on this conversion rather than concluding that the class has failed. Her kidney disease may also have a genetic contribution: APOL1 risk variants, found more often in people of recent African ancestry, are associated with faster progression of nondiabetic kidney disease, which adds to the case for kidney-protective therapy.

Ethnicity

Some hypertension guidance has recommended drug classes by race. The 2014 panel report recommended a thiazide or calcium channel blocker as initial therapy for Black patients without chronic kidney disease, based on trial evidence of greater blood pressure response to those classes (James et al., 2014). That same report made an exception for chronic kidney disease, recommending an ACE inhibitor or ARB for all patients with it regardless of race. This plan leans on measured findings, her albuminuria and her creatinine trend, rather than on race, because the kidney finding is what the drug is chosen to treat, and a race-based rule would steer her toward a class that does not address it.

Behavior

Two behaviors reduce the effectiveness of the plan and increase its risks. High dietary sodium blunts the antihypertensive and antiproteinuric effect of renin-angiotensin blockade, so salt reduction is part of the therapy rather than general advice. Regular naproxen use raises blood pressure, reduces renal prostaglandins that maintain afferent arteriolar flow, and, combined with an ARB, increases the risk of acute kidney injury and hyperkalemia. Topical diclofenac or acetaminophen is recommended for her knee pain instead.

Education and Follow-Up

Mrs. O. is told that the new pill protects her kidneys as well as lowering her blood pressure, and that it is chosen because it works differently from the pill that made her cough. She is asked to stop naproxen and to avoid salt substitutes, which usually contain potassium. She is told to hold the medicine and call if she has vomiting or diarrhea that stops her from drinking, since dehydration while taking it can harm the kidneys. She continues home blood pressure readings twice a day and brings the log to her next visit. Basic metabolic panel is rechecked in two weeks to reassess potassium and creatinine, and again after each dose increase. At three months, the plan reassesses blood pressure against a target below 130/80, the threshold most current guidance uses for adults with chronic kidney disease (Carey et al., 2022), the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and whether a third agent is needed.

References

Carey, R. M., Moran, A. E., & Whelton, P. K. (2022). Treatment of hypertension: A review. JAMA, 328(18), 1849-1861. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.19590

Cheung, A. K., Chang, T. I., Cushman, W. C., Furth, S. L., Hou, F. F., Ix, J. H., Knoll, G. A., Muntner, P., Pecoits-Filho, R., Sarnak, M. J., Tobe, S. W., Tomson, C. R. V., & Mann, J. F. E. (2021). KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease. Kidney International, 99(3S), S1-S87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.11.003

James, P. A., Oparil, S., Carter, B. L., Cushman, W. C., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C., Handler, J., Lackland, D. T., LeFevre, M. L., MacKenzie, T. D., Ogedegbe, O., Smith, S. C., Jr., Svetkey, L. P., Taler, S. J., Townsend, R. R., Wright, J. T., Jr., Narva, A. S., & Ortiz, E. (2014). 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: Report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA, 311(5), 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.284427

Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2021). Lehne's pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2nd ed.). Elsevier.

NURS 6521 Week 3 instructions, in plain terms

The third NURS 6521 week asks you to choose drug therapy for a cardiovascular condition in a specific patient. Summarize the patient, compare options, choose one with reasons tied to the patient and address factors such as age, genetics, ethnicity and behavior. Justification tied to this patient scores above a choice based only on guideline preference. Cite guidelines and pharmacology sources in APA 7. Comparing classes she will not receive shows why the chosen one fits best. Dosing can be included if the prompt asks. Ethnicity should be handled carefully, as one factor among many. A table comparing each class on kidney protection, side effects and fit with her history keeps the comparison clear. Sections on patient factors and follow-up then explain the choice in her terms.

How this NURS 6521 Week 3 example is built

A patient summary of about a hundred words opens the plan, listing conditions, current agents, relevant laboratory trends and a note that she developed a persistent dry cough on an earlier prescription. The plan then compares three classes in a short table: an angiotensin receptor blocker, a thiazide diuretic and a calcium channel blocker, each with its mechanism, its effect on the kidney and its main risk for this patient. Prose under the table selects the receptor blocker, because blocking angiotensin II at the receptor relaxes the efferent arteriole and reduces protein loss, and because the earlier cough points to bradykinin accumulating under an ACE inhibitor. A patient-factors section follows, then education points and a follow-up plan stated as what would be reassessed.

Reading the NURS 6521 Week 3 rubric

Justification is where most rubrics in this course concentrate, and it is judged by connection: a class chosen because guidelines prefer it scores below one chosen because its mechanism answers something documented in the patient. Rejected alternatives also earn credit in many sections, since explaining why a thiazide was not first shows reasoning that naming the blocker alone does not. Patient-factor rows lose points when a factor is defined and never applied, when genetics gets a general paragraph instead of a reason this woman's response might differ. Education is assessed for specificity, and a line telling the patient to take medication as prescribed carries little weight. Evidence and formatting take the final share, usually a small one.

NURS 6521 Week 3 help from the desk

Therapy plans score poorly when the choice rests on guidelines alone. Tie it to her kidneys and cough history. A second weakness is comparing only one option. Compare several. Writers also skip monitoring. Plan potassium and creatinine checks. Avoid treating ethnicity as decisive. Weigh it with other factors. Include education. A sentence explaining that angiotensin receptor blockers avoid the bradykinin buildup that caused her cough connects mechanism to history. Close with when you will recheck her labs. State the target blood pressure and when you will check it.

Get a NURS 6521 Week 3 example written to your instructions

A composite patient anchors this sample, and the case your instructor posted can replace her. Send those case details together with the rubric, and a NURS 6521 Week 3 therapy plan returns in 24 to 48 hours with the comparison table and factor paragraphs built for your patient. The first custom one is free.

More NURS 6521 papers and MSN samples

NURS 6521 Week 3 questions, answered

Why does the plan compare classes the patient will not receive?

Because the reasoning is what gets graded, and reasoning is visible only when alternatives are weighed. A plan naming one class and its benefits shows knowledge of that class; a plan explaining why two others were set aside shows judgment about this patient. Most rubrics in the course reward the second, which is why the example gives rejected options a fair hearing before choosing.

Does the example include dosing?

No amounts, starting points or titration schedules appear anywhere in it. The plan names the class and the specific agent's mechanism, then describes what would be reassessed at follow-up in general terms. If your prompt asks for dosing, take it from the prescribing references your course assigns, since those change and must match a real patient's measured values.

How does the plan handle ethnicity as a factor?

Carefully and briefly. It notes that some hypertension guidance has differentiated first-line classes by race, explains the physiological argument offered for that, and then gives more weight to the patient's measured kidney findings and prior drug response. That treatment reflects current debate in the literature, and your section may frame the factor differently; the paragraph can be rebuilt to match.

Where can I find a free NURS 6521 Week 3 sample paper?

The albuminuric kidney disease antihypertensive plan is printed here with options compared, the choice, patient factors and education.

Why an angiotensin receptor blocker in NURS 6521 Week 3?

It reduces albuminuria and protects the kidneys like an ACE inhibitor but does not cause the bradykinin-related cough she had before.