| Course | NURS 6221 Managing Human Resources |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 10 |
| Paper type | Workforce budget analysis |
| Length | About 710 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 6221 Week 10
Workforce Budget Analysis: Pricing the Term's Recommendations
Student Name
College of Nursing, Walden University
NURS 6221: Managing Human Resources
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Workforce Budget Analysis: Pricing the Term's Recommendations
This analysis prices the five workforce recommendations made for our composite progressive care unit this term. Each is built from hours and full-time equivalents (FTEs) first and converted to dollars using the assumed rates in Table 1. The rates are planning assumptions for this exercise, not the hospital's actual contract rates, and they should be replaced with finance office figures before any request goes forward.
Table 1
Rate Assumptions
| Item | Assumed value |
|---|---|
| Registered nurse base rate | $45 per hour |
| Benefits load on paid hours | 30% |
| Incentive shift premium | $15 per hour above base |
| Agency registered nurse rate | $95 per hour, all-inclusive |
| Nurse manager rate | $60 per hour |
| Productive hours per FTE | 1,830 (2,080 paid, 12% non-productive) |
Summary
Table 2
Cost and Offset by Recommendation
| Recommendation | Hours per year | FTE | Annual cost | Expected offset |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charge nurse without assignment, 24 hours a day | 9,984 paid (8,760 productive) | 4.8 | $584,064 | Not directly offset; justified on safety and support |
| Agency nurses for weekend nights | 1,740 | Contracted | $165,300 | Replaces incentive coverage; costs about $8,700 more than overtime-rate incentive shifts |
| Incentive shifts capped at two per schedule | 600 | 0.3 | $45,000 | Replaces about $57,000 of agency hours; saves about $12,000 |
| Extended orientation, two nurses a year | 96 | 0.05 | $5,616 | One avoided first-year departure would repay it many times |
| Stay interviews | 21 manager hours | 0.01 | $1,638 | Retention; not directly measurable in a single year |
The Arithmetic, Recommendation by Recommendation
Charge nurse. Covering the role around the clock takes 8,760 productive hours a year, or 4.8 FTEs at 1,830 productive hours each. The budget must pay for 4.8 × 2,080 = 9,984 hours, because vacation, education and sick time are paid whether or not the role is staffed on a given day. At the base rate plus benefits, that is $584,064. This is by far the largest cost, and its return is in safety and staff support rather than in dollars saved.
Agency for weekend nights. The unit used about 435 agency hours a quarter on weekend nights, or 1,740 a year, which at $95 an hour costs $165,300. If the same hours were filled by the unit's own nurses picking up extra shifts, most would fall beyond 40 hours in a workweek. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, non-exempt employees who work past 40 hours in a workweek must be paid at least one and a half times their regular rate (29 U.S.C. § 207), and nondiscretionary incentive pay counts toward that regular rate. An incentive hour past the threshold therefore costs 1.5 × $60 = $90, so agency coverage costs about $5 more per hour, or roughly $8,700 more a year. The case for agency rests on fatigue, not on price.
Capped incentive shifts. Allowing up to two incentive shifts per nurse per schedule is expected to fill about 600 hours a year. If half of those hours fall beyond 40 hours in a week, the cost is 300 × $60 plus 300 × $90, or $45,000. The same hours bought from an agency would cost $57,000, a saving of about $12,000.
Extended orientation. Four added orientation shifts for an estimated two new graduates a year come to 96 hours at the base rate plus benefits, $5,616. The offset depends on retention: the cost of replacing a nurse, which Jones (2008) shows how to estimate and update for inflation from a hospital's own baseline, is far larger than this amount.
Stay interviews. Thirty minutes at three, six and nine months for 14 new hires is 21 manager hours, or $1,638.
Variance and Ranking
Against the current budget, the proposals add roughly $590,000, almost all of it the charge nurse role, while the agency and incentive changes roughly offset each other. By net cost, from lowest to highest: the capped incentive shifts (a net saving), stay interviews, extended orientation, agency weekend nights and the unassigned charge nurse. The first three should proceed immediately. Agency coverage should continue because of the fatigue risk of overtime, which the evidence on agency staffing does not show to carry a mortality penalty once work environments are accounted for (Aiken et al., 2013). The charge nurse role needs its own business case to the director, built on safety events and turnover rather than on this table.
References
Aiken, L. H., Shang, J., Xue, Y., & Sloane, D. M. (2013). Hospital use of agency-employed supplemental nurses and patient mortality and failure to rescue. Health Services Research, 48(3), 931-948. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12018
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (1938).
Jones, C. B. (2008). Revisiting nurse turnover costs: Adjusting for inflation. Journal of Nursing Administration, 38(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNA.0000295636.03216.6f
NURS 6221 Week 10 instructions, in plain terms
Week 10 of NURS 6221 usually asks you to price workforce proposals. You build each cost from hours and FTEs, convert with stated rates, include nonproductive time and benefits, compare with expected savings or avoided costs and rank the options. Faculty refuse figures without the hours and rates beneath them. Cite turnover cost research and wage law in APA 7. If the course gives no wage data, use labeled planning rates and say where a real budget would get them. The analysis does not have to show savings; it has to show the true cost. A clear layout puts a rates table first, then one short section per recommendation, then the ranking.
How this NURS 6221 Week 10 example is built
A summary table leads the paper, one row per recommendation, with hours, full-time equivalents, the rate applied, an annual cost and the offsetting reduction each is expected to produce. Beneath it, each recommendation receives a paragraph explaining its arithmetic. The charge nurse position is costed as productive and non-productive hours together, since vacation and education time are paid whether or not the role is staffed on a given day. Incentive and overtime hours carry the Fair Labor Standards Act premium for non-exempt staff once the weekly threshold is passed. Rates come from a labeled assumptions table rather than being stated as facts. A variance section compares the proposed budget with the current one, and a final paragraph ranks recommendations by net cost.
Where the marks sit in the NURS 6221 Week 10 rubric
Annual costs stated without the hours and rates beneath them ask a budget reader to trust instead of check, and that request is refused in the grading. Method accuracy draws most of the points, so leaving non-productive time out of a position's cost is a visible and expensive error. Assumptions have to be labeled; a rate with no label reads as a guess presented as fact. Offsets earn where they are argued, since a recommendation claiming to pay for itself needs its mechanism stated. Integration with earlier assignments is weighted in late-term work, which is why every row here traces back to a prior recommendation. Totals that fail to reconcile with their rows are found quickly and cost more than their size suggests.
NURS 6221 Week 10 help: mistakes that cost marks
Budget analyses lose credit when annual costs appear without the arithmetic. Show hours, rate and total for each line. Another common gap is leaving out nonproductive time and benefits. Add them. Writers also compare costs with no return. Estimate avoided turnover. Avoid precise-looking figures without labels. Mark planning rates. Check that overtime is priced at the legal premium. Round consistently so totals match. A ranking that puts the cheapest option first only when it also does the most good shows judgment rather than thrift. Close with the recommendation you would fund first. State which assumptions would change the ranking if they proved wrong.
Get a NURS 6221 Week 10 example written to your instructions
Upload the prompt, the rubric and any cost or wage figures the course distributes, and the budget analysis is built on those numbers alone. Free on the first custom request, delivered within 24 to 48 hours. The rates in the sample are labeled assumptions for a fictional unit, so payroll data from your organization is never needed.
More NURS 6221 papers and MSN samples
- NURS 6221 Week 1: Workforce Analysis
- NURS 6221 Week 2: Discussion Post
- NURS 6221 Week 3: Staffing Plan
- NURS 6221 Week 4: Position Description
- NURS 6221 Week 5: Interview and Selection Plan
- NURS 6221 Week 6: Discussion Post
- NURS 6221 Week 7: Performance Improvement Memo
- NURS 6221 Week 8: Recruitment and Retention Plan
- NURS 6221 Week 9: Discussion Post
- NURS 6221 Week 11: Reflection
- NURS 6223 Week 10: Safety culture analysis
- NURS 6201 Week 10: Leadership Development Plan
- NURS 6224 Week 10: Discussion post
- NURS 6053 Week 10: Change Implementation Plan
NURS 6221 Week 10 questions, answered
What if the course provides no wage data?
Then the analysis uses labeled assumptions and says where a manager would find the actual figures, as the sample does. Graders accept assumed rates when they are stated as such and applied consistently. The weaker choices are presenting guessed wages as fact, or skipping the costing because no data was provided, since this assignment exists to put prices on decisions.
Why include non-productive hours?
Because a position is paid for time not worked: vacation, holidays, education and sick leave. Costing only the hours a charge nurse spends on the unit understates what the role costs the budget. The sample separates productive and non-productive time so both are visible, and it is one of the places graders check first.
Does the analysis have to show savings?
It has to show expected offsets where they exist and admit where they do not. In the sample, reduced agency use offsets part of the charge nurse's cost, while stay interviews appear as a cost whose return depends on retention. A budget claiming that every recommendation pays for itself tends to be read with suspicion.
Where can I find a free NURS 6221 Week 10 sample paper?
The workforce budget analysis is on this page with the rates table, the arithmetic for each recommendation, the variance and the ranking.
How many recommendations are priced in NURS 6221 Week 10?
Five, each built from hours and FTEs before being turned into dollars with labeled planning rates.