| Course | NURS 4212 Population Health Nursing |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 10 |
| Paper type | Population intervention plan |
| Length | About 1,240 words, 7 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NURS 4212 Week 10
Population Intervention Plan: Increasing Blood Lead Testing Among Young Children in Portsmouth's Oldest Housing
Student Name
College of Nursing, Walden University
NURS 4212: Population Health Nursing
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Population Intervention Plan: Increasing Blood Lead Testing Among Young Children in Portsmouth's Oldest Housing
This plan responds to the third community nursing diagnosis from the Portsmouth assessment: risk of elevated blood lead levels among young children, related to old housing and high poverty. It is written in the order a health department reviewer would read it: population, goal, objectives, activities, logic model, evaluation, timeline, partners and sustainability.
Population
The population is children younger than six living in census tracts 32, 34, 35 and 37 in Portsmouth, Ohio. These four tracts were chosen because they combine the city's oldest housing with its deepest poverty. In each, at least 97% of housing units were built before 1980 and between 42% and 73% before 1950, and between 37% and 49% of residents live below the poverty line (U.S. Census Bureau, 2025). Federal rules ended the sale of lead-based paint for homes in 1978, and homes built before 1950 are the most likely to contain it in high concentrations. Between 47% and 74% of households in these tracts rent, so many families cannot make repairs on their own.
The American Community Survey estimates about 840 children under five across the four tracts, which suggests roughly 1,000 under six. Tract margins of error are wide, and the true figure could be several hundred higher or lower.
The problem this plan addresses is testing. No blood lead level in children is known to be safe, and the pediatric policy statement on lead puts primary prevention first, by removing hazards from housing, while using blood tests to find children already exposed (Council on Environmental Health, 2016). The CDC's blood lead reference value, which flags children whose levels fall in the top 2.5% of the national distribution, was lowered to 3.5 micrograms per deciliter in 2021 (Ruckart et al., 2021). A child who is never tested cannot be identified or followed. Testing coverage for the four tracts will be taken from the Ohio Department of Health's childhood lead poisoning surveillance data, requested as the plan's first step; that figure is the baseline for Objective 1.
Goal
Every child under six in Portsmouth's oldest, poorest neighborhoods is tested for lead on schedule, and every child with an elevated level receives follow-up and a home investigation.
Objectives
Objective 1. By December 31, 2028, at least 80% of children who turn two years old during 2028 and live in tracts 32, 34, 35 and 37 will have had at least one blood lead test by their second birthday. Data source: Ohio Department of Health childhood lead surveillance, matched to tract by address. Baseline: 2026 coverage for the same tracts, obtained before launch.
Objective 2. By December 31, 2028, 100% of children in the four tracts with a confirmed blood lead level of 3.5 micrograms per deciliter or higher will receive a nurse home visit within 30 days of the confirmed result. Data source: the health department's case management records. Baseline: the proportion visited within 30 days during 2026.
Objective 3. By June 30, 2029, 90% of homes identified through home visits as containing lead hazards will have been referred to housing code enforcement or the state lead hazard control program, with a documented response. Data source: referral log shared between the health department and code enforcement. Baseline: none exists, since no shared referral log is kept; the first six months of the log will establish it.
Activities
Testing outreach at nutrition program clinics. Families with young children in these tracts regularly visit the WIC clinic. Nurses will check each child's testing status at WIC certification visits and offer a capillary test on site or a same-week referral.
Testing outreach at childcare centers and early learning programs. Nurses will hold testing days with parental consent, and send testing reminders home with children who are due.
Primary care reminders. The federally qualified health center and pediatric practices will receive monthly lists of children in the four tracts who are due for testing, built from surveillance data.
Home visits for children with elevated results. A public health nurse will visit within 30 days to review nutrition, hygiene and sources of exposure, and to arrange an environmental investigation of the home.
Referral to housing code enforcement. Because household education and dust control alone have not been shown to lower children's blood lead levels at the population level (Nussbaumer-Streit et al., 2020), each identified hazard will be referred for enforcement or for repair funding, and the referral tracked until the landlord or owner responds.
Logic Model
Table 1
Logic Model for the Blood Lead Testing Plan
| Resources | What the plan does | What it produces | Changes within two years | Changes over five or more years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public health nurses; surveillance data; WIC and childcare partners; capillary testing supplies; code enforcement staff | Testing outreach at WIC and childcare; due lists to primary care; home visits; hazard referrals | Children offered tests; tests completed; home visits made; referrals sent and answered | Higher testing coverage by age 2; timely follow-up of elevated results | Fewer children with elevated blood lead; fewer lead-hazard homes in the four tracts |
Evaluation
Process measures show whether the plan was delivered: the number of children whose testing status was checked at WIC visits, the number tested at childcare sites, the number of due lists sent to practices, the proportion of elevated results followed by a home visit within 30 days, and the number of hazard referrals sent and answered. These will be reviewed quarterly.
Outcome measures show whether delivery made a difference: testing coverage by age two in the four tracts (Objective 1), timeliness of follow-up (Objective 2), and resolution of referred hazards (Objective 3). Over a longer horizon, the proportion of tested children with levels at or above the reference value will be tracked, although rising testing may at first reveal more elevated levels rather than fewer. That early rise should be read as the plan finding children, not as a failure.
Timeline
First quarter of 2027: obtain baseline data; sign agreements with WIC, childcare programs and code enforcement. Second quarter: train nurses and begin WIC outreach. Third quarter: add childcare testing days and primary care due lists. From 2028: full operation, with quarterly process review and an annual outcome report. First half of 2029: final evaluation against all three objectives.
Partners
The Portsmouth City Health Department leads, with the Scioto County Health Department for families near the city line. The WIC program provides the main testing contact. Childcare centers and early learning programs host testing days. The federally qualified health center and pediatric practices receive due lists and complete tests. Portsmouth code enforcement receives hazard referrals. The Ohio Department of Health supplies surveillance data and lead hazard control resources.
Sustainability
The plan is designed to outlast its first two years. WIC testing checks can become a standard part of certification visits, and due lists can be generated automatically once the data link with the state is built. The shared referral log with code enforcement costs little to keep. The most fragile element is nurse time for home visits, which will need a stable line in the health department budget. One caution frames the whole plan: the national preventive services task force found insufficient evidence to recommend routine blood lead screening for all asymptomatic young children (US Preventive Services Task Force, 2019). This plan targets children at clearly higher risk because of their housing, and it pairs testing with action on the homes themselves, which is where lasting prevention lies.
References
Council on Environmental Health. (2016). Prevention of childhood lead toxicity. Pediatrics, 138(1), Article e20161493. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1493
Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Mayr, V., Dobrescu, A. I., Wagner, G., Chapman, A., Pfadenhauer, L. M., Lohner, S., Lhachimi, S. K., Busert, L. K., & Gartlehner, G. (2020). Household interventions for secondary prevention of domestic lead exposure in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (10), Article CD006047. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006047.pub6
Ruckart, P. Z., Jones, R. L., Courtney, J. G., LeBlanc, T. T., Jackson, W., Karwowski, M. P., Cheng, P.-Y., Allwood, P., Svendsen, E. R., & Breysse, P. N. (2021). Update of the blood lead reference value: United States, 2021. MMWR: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70(43), 1509-1512. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7043a4
U.S. Census Bureau. (2025). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2020-2024 [Data set]. https://data.census.gov/
US Preventive Services Task Force. (2019). Screening for elevated blood lead levels in children and pregnant women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 321(15), 1502-1509. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.3326
Reading the NURS 4212 Week 10 instructions
The tenth NURS 4212 week typically brings the final population intervention plan. You define the population, set a goal and SMART objectives, describe activities, build a logic model, plan evaluation, set a timeline, name partners and address sustainability. Faculty concentrate marks on objectives, alignment and evaluation. Cite public health guidance and state rules in APA 7. A budget may be required or optional. The plan should follow from a diagnosis in your assessment. Clinical testing guidance should be described in general terms. NURS 4212 faculty want SMART objectives, a logic model linking activities to outcomes, evaluation that tracks both activity and results, and partners whose jobs are spelled out.
How the NURS 4212 Week 10 example is put together
The plan runs long and moves in the order a health department reviewer would read it. The population section bounds the group by age, housing age and census tract, drawing on assessment data about homes built before the federal ban on lead-based residential paint and on testing coverage from the state lead surveillance program. A goal statement follows, then three objectives written to the SMART standard, each naming its data source, baseline and target. Activities include testing outreach through nutrition program clinics and childcare centers, home visits for families of children with elevated results, and referral to housing code enforcement. A logic model table links inputs to activities, outputs and outcomes. The evaluation section separates process measures from outcome measures. A timeline, partner roles and a sustainability paragraph complete the plan.
NURS 4212 Week 10 rubric: what earns full marks
Final intervention plans usually carry the course's largest single share, and marks concentrate on objectives, alignment and evaluation. Objective credit depends on measurability, and objectives naming a data source, baseline and target meet that standard in a way aspirational goals cannot. Alignment credit rewards plans whose activities clearly serve their objectives and whose objectives address the assessment's documented problem; the logic model makes that chain visible in one table. Evaluation earns the remaining large share when process and outcome measures are kept separate and tied to real data. Losses in this week often come from objectives lacking a baseline, activities sized for a single clinic when the population spans several tracts, evaluation plans measuring satisfaction instead of the outcome, and sustainability sections that simply hope funding continues. Partner roles described in a sentence each add modest credit.
NURS 4212 Week 10 help: mistakes that cost marks
Intervention plans lose the most when objectives cannot be measured, such as improve awareness of lead. Write a number, a population and a date. Another common gap is activities that do not connect to objectives. Use the logic model to show the links. Writers also give evaluation one measure. Add process and outcome measures. Avoid activities without partners to run them. Name who does what. Plan for after grant funding ends. Close with the first quarter's milestones. Writers also forget landlords and housing agencies as partners, since old housing is the source. Include them. Another frequent slip is ignoring follow-up for children with elevated levels. Mention the referral path.
Get a NURS 4212 Week 10 example written to your instructions
Send the final plan instructions, the rubric and your assessment's priority problem with any draft objectives, and the plan returned to you is sized to that population and measurable throughout. The first custom plan is free and arrives within 24-48 hours, logic model, evaluation and timeline included, each objective tied to a data source you can check.
More NURS 4212 papers and BSN samples
- NURS 4212 Week 1: Population Thinking Post
- NURS 4212 Week 2: Epidemiology Measures Thread
- NURS 4212 Week 3: Community Demographics Section
- NURS 4212 Week 4: Health Indicators Section
- NURS 4212 Week 5: Determinants of Health Thread
- NURS 4212 Week 6: Vulnerable Population Analysis
- NURS 4212 Week 7: Assembled Community Assessment
- NURS 4212 Week 8: Prevention Priority Post
- NURS 4212 Week 9: Intervention Strategy Outline
- NURS 4212 Week 11: Population Nursing Reflection
- NURS 4300 Week 10: Staff Presentation
- NURS 4151 Week 10: EBP Project
- NURS 3021 Week 10: Integrated Change Synthesis
- NURS 4110 Week 10: Final Policy Brief
NURS 4212 Week 10 questions, answered
What makes an objective measurable in this plan?
A named data source, a baseline value from that source, a target and a date. Objectives missing any of the four are hard to evaluate. The example states each part explicitly, drawing on surveillance data the community already collects. A custom sample writes your objectives the same way, using sources your assessment identified and baselines you can cite.
Does the plan include a budget?
It includes resource categories and partner contributions rather than dollar figures, because costs vary widely and invented numbers would mislead. Some sections require a line-item budget, and when yours does, the sample adds one built on published cost sources where available, with assumptions stated. Your rubric decides whether a budget is required and how detailed it must be.
Is the example giving guidance on lead testing?
No. The plan describes a population health intervention as an academic exercise, and its activities illustrate plan structure rather than recommend clinical practice. Testing criteria and follow-up protocols belong to public health authorities and clinical guidelines. The sample shows how a plan links population, objectives, activities and evaluation, which is what the assignment grades.
Where can I find a free NURS 4212 Week 10 sample paper?
The blood lead testing plan is reproduced here with the population, goal, objectives, activities, logic model, evaluation, timeline, partners and sustainability.
Which population does the NURS 4212 Week 10 plan target?
Children under six in four Portsmouth tracts with the oldest housing, at risk of elevated blood lead.