NURS 3111 Week 8 Technology Proposal Outline Example

Course	NURS 3111 Nursing Informatics and Healthcare Technology
Week	Week 8
Paper type	Technology proposal outline
Length	About 540 words, 4 pages
Format	APA 7 student paper
School	Walden University
Program	Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN)
Updated	October 2026

Free sample paper for NURS 3111 Week 8

Technology Proposal Outline: Sending Vital Signs Straight From the Monitor to the Record for Nurse Validation

Student Name

College of Nursing, Walden University

NURS 3111: Nursing Informatics and Healthcare Technology

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title pairs one nursing problem with one specific fix. At the outline stage the proposal is a skeleton, but every heading is labeled and the open questions are in plain view.

Technology Proposal Outline: Sending Vital Signs Straight From the Monitor to the Record for Nurse Validation

I. Nursing Problem

A. On the composite medical-surgical unit where this proposal would start, vital signs are measured on portable monitors, written on paper, a glove, or a hand, and typed into the electronic record later, often in batches.

B. Consequences: transcription errors; charted values that are hours old; early warning scores that read late data; nursing time spent retyping numbers.

C. Evidence the problem is real: paper-based charting of vital signs produced errors in nearly a fifth of entries, and the typical reading needed well over half an hour to appear in the record (Fieler et al., 2013). Respiratory rate, a strong signal of deterioration, is among the vital signs most often estimated or left out (Cretikos et al., 2008).

II. Proposed Technology

A. Connect the unit's portable vital sign monitors to the electronic record through the hospital's device integration system.

B. The nurse scans the patient's wristband on the monitor, takes the vital signs, and the values appear in the record as pending.

C. The nurse reviews and validates the values before they are filed; unvalidated values are flagged after 15 minutes.

D. Respiratory rate is still counted by the nurse and entered on the monitor before validation.

III. Evidence for the Technology

A. Wireless transmission of vital signs to the record eliminated recording errors and reduced the time to availability to about 5 minutes in a comparison with paper (Fieler et al., 2013).

B. Nurses' time is heavily spent on documentation, and reducing redundant entry is one of the main targets for recovering time for patient care (Hendrich et al., 2008).

What this page is doingEach section carries its evidence under a label, and the evidence is matched to the specific claim it supports.

IV. Stakeholders

A. Bedside nurses and nursing assistants who take vital signs. B. Nurse manager and unit educator. C. Clinical informatics team. D. Biomedical engineering, which maintains the monitors. E. Information technology, which runs the integration engine. F. Vendor of the monitors.

V. Open Questions

A. Are the unit's current monitors capable of integration, or would new monitors be needed? Answer needed from biomedical engineering.

B. Can nursing assistants validate values, or must a registered nurse? Policy question for nursing leadership.

C. What happens when the network is down? Downtime procedure not yet defined.

D. How will validation be prevented from becoming a one-click habit that files wrong values? Design question for informatics.

E. What is the cost, and which budget would carry it? Not yet known.

VI. Measures to Define Before Implementation

A. Time from measurement to charting. B. Proportion of charted values later corrected. C. Proportion of respiratory rates charted as the same value as the previous reading, a marker of estimation. D. Nurse-reported time spent on vital sign documentation per shift.

VII. Next Steps Before the Full Proposal

A. Meet biomedical engineering to answer open question A, since it decides whether the proposal needs capital funding. B. Observe two day shifts and one night shift to measure the current time from measurement to charting, so the full proposal has a local baseline rather than only published figures. C. Ask the nurse manager which committee would approve a pilot. D. Draft the downtime procedure with information technology, because a proposal without one is unlikely to be approved.

References

Cretikos, M. A., Bellomo, R., Hillman, K., Chen, J., Finfer, S., & Flabouris, A. (2008). Respiratory rate: The neglected vital sign. Medical Journal of Australia, 188(11), 657-659. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01825.x

Fieler, V. K., Jaglowski, T., & Richards, K. (2013). Eliminating errors in vital signs documentation. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 31(9), 422-427. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NCN.0000432125.61526.27

Hendrich, A., Chow, M. P., Skierczynski, B. A., & Lu, Z. (2008). A 36-hospital time and motion study: How do medical-surgical nurses spend their time? The Permanente Journal, 12(3), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/08-021

NURS 3111 Week 8 instructions, in plain terms

The eighth NURS 3111 week usually asks for an outline of a technology proposal you will complete later. You state the nursing problem, describe the technology, list evidence, name stakeholders, raise open questions, define measures and set next steps. Faculty score outlines lightly but read for problem clarity and evidence fit. Cite studies in APA 7 even at the outline stage. Full sentences may be optional; check your section. The technology can be one your unit already uses if you propose a new use. The final proposal may adjust the outline but should follow its logic. NURS 3111 faculty want the stakeholders named, from nursing and IT to biomedical engineering, and at least one open question, such as what happens when the wireless network drops.

How this NURS 3111 Week 8 example is built

Three pages in outline form, with full sentences at every point rather than fragments. Section one states the nursing problem: readings taken on time but recorded late, sometimes transcribed from paper, so the record lags the patient. Section two names the technology, device integration that sends monitor values to the flowsheet for nurse validation, and explains why it fits this problem rather than a neighboring one. Section three lists four sources already located, each with a line on what it contributes. Section four sets out anticipated barriers, including cost and staff acceptance, framed with the Technology Acceptance Model. The last section is a list of open questions: what validation should require, how a shared monitor gets tied to the right patient, and what happens during downtime.

Reading the NURS 3111 Week 8 rubric

Outline stages are often scored more lightly than the finished proposal, yet their criteria preview what the final version will face. Problem clarity comes first: a problem stated in nursing terms, with its effect on care, earns the opening rows, and one stated as a wish for new equipment does not. Fit carries the next weight, rewarding a match argued rather than assumed. Evidence rows at this stage usually look for relevant, current sources and a sense of what each will do, which the tagged list shows. A barrier or feasibility row appears in many versions, and anchoring it to an acceptance model gives it substance. The open-questions list may not map to any named row, but instructors read it as foresight, and it tends to draw feedback that protects points later.

Common NURS 3111 Week 8 mistakes, and how to avoid them

Outlines lose credit when the problem is stated as a technology wish rather than a nursing problem. Start with what goes wrong for nurses and patients. Evidence about a different technology also weakens the outline. Cite studies of automated vital sign documentation. Writers also skip open questions, which show realism. List them. Avoid naming a vendor as if the choice were made. Keep nurse validation in the workflow. Define measures now, such as time from measurement to chart entry. Close with the next step before the full proposal. Writers also forget the nurse validation step, which keeps wrong readings out of the record. Describe it. Another frequent slip is measures with no baseline. Plan to collect one.

Get a NURS 3111 Week 8 example written to your instructions

A sentence on the nursing problem you have in mind is the most useful thing to send, alongside the proposal instructions and rubric. A custom outline comes back pairing that problem with a technology that fits it. The first is free, delivered within 24-48h, and its open-questions section is written to carry forward into the final paper.

More NURS 3111 papers and BSN samples

NURS 3111 Week 8 questions, answered

Does the outline need full sentences?

Most rubrics for this stage expect them, and the sample uses full sentences at every point. Fragment outlines hide whether the reasoning works, because a phrase like improves efficiency can stand in for an argument that is never made. Sentences force each point to say something that can be evaluated, which is the reason an outline gets submitted at all.

Can the technology be something my unit already uses?

It can, if the proposal is about extending or changing it. Many strong outlines propose a new use for existing equipment, such as switching on an integration feature a monitor already supports. The sample describes integration generically. What matters is that the proposal matches a clearly defined nursing problem, whatever the device's current status on the unit.

How closely must the final proposal follow the outline?

Closely enough that an instructor who read the outline recognizes the final paper, and loosely enough to absorb feedback. Outlines exist partly to collect that feedback. The sample's open-questions section is designed for exactly this: it tells the instructor where guidance would help, and it gives the final version a place to show the guidance was used.

Where can I find a free NURS 3111 Week 8 sample paper?

The monitor-to-record outline is on this page with the problem, technology, evidence, stakeholders, open questions, measures and next steps.

What does the NURS 3111 Week 8 outline propose?

Sending vital signs from portable monitors straight to the record for nurse validation instead of copying them by hand.