For an invented eight-year-old with spina bifida, a care coordination plan example for Week 3 of NRNP 6831 gives nine services each an owner, a report-back route and a review date. Searches like "nrnp 6831 week 3 assignment example", "nrnp6831 week 3 sample" and "nrnp 6831 week 3 example" land here.
What a finished NRNP 6831 Week 3 care coordination plan looks like
The center of the plan is a care map in the style associated with Antonelli, drawn with the child and family in the middle and nine services around them: neurosurgery, urology, orthopedics, physical and occupational therapy, a wheelchair vendor, the school nurse, a home supply company, and primary care as the medical home. Beneath the map sits a coordination table with one row per service, stating what that service holds, the named role responsible, what information it sends to the medical home and how often, and the review date. A shared plan of care summarizes goals agreed with the family in their words. An escalation section lists who is contacted first for a suspected shunt problem, a catheter supply gap or a broken wheelchair. The final page names the medical home care coordinator as keeper of the table.
How a NRNP 6831 Week 3 example is structured
Map, table, shared plan, escalation, keeper: the sequence moves from seeing the network to running it. The map comes first because a reader, like the family, needs the whole picture before any row makes sense, and it is drawn from the family's account of who they actually see rather than from the referral list. The table follows the map's order so each row can be traced to a node. The medical home model supplies the organizing premise that one practice holds the whole plan, which is why primary care appears both as a node and as the keeper. The shared plan of care comes after the table because goals only become actionable once owners exist. Escalation is written by problem, not by service, since a family in trouble thinks in problems. Naming the keeper last closes the question every earlier section raises.
The care map
Nine services around the child and family, drawn from what the parents report rather than from referral records.
One row per service
What each service holds, the responsible role, what it reports to the medical home, how often, and when it is reviewed.
Goals in the family's words
A shared plan of care listing aims the parents chose, each linked to the rows that serve it.
Escalation by problem
Shunt concern, catheter supply gap and wheelchair failure, each with the first contact and the backup.
The keeper
The medical home coordinator named as holder of the table and the person who updates it.
Where marks go in NRNP 6831 Week 3
Unowned rows cost the most. A table that names services without a responsible role, or assigns 'the team', has mapped the care without coordinating it, and faculty deduct at every such row. Report-back routes are the second area: rows that say what a service does but not what returns to the medical home leave the plan unable to notice a dropped thread. Care maps drawn from referral records rather than from the family's account tend to miss the vendor and the supply company, which are often the weakest links. Goals written in clinical language, with no sign the family chose them, weaken the shared plan section. An escalation list organized by specialty confuses the very reader it serves. Small deductions follow from missing review dates and an unnamed keeper.
Get a NRNP 6831 Week 3 example written to your instructions
Include the Week 3 prompt, the rubric and the child your section described, and the coordination plan is delivered with a care map, an owner on every row and a named keeper. Delivery takes 24 to 48 hours, with no charge on a first order. He is a composite eight-year-old; his map, his vendors and his school nurse were invented.
NRNP 6831 Week 3 questions, answered
What is a care map?
It is a family-centered diagram, associated with Richard Antonelli and colleagues' pediatric care coordination work, that shows a child and family at the center and every person, service and resource they rely on around them. Families often draw it themselves. Its value here is that it reveals connections and gaps a list would hide. If your section prefers an ecomap or another diagram, the plan uses that instead.
What does the medical home model add?
Its central premise, promoted by the American Academy of Pediatrics, is that one accessible, family-centered practice holds responsibility for coordinating a child's care across every other service. The example uses that premise to decide who keeps the coordination table. In practice some children's care is held by a specialty complex care program instead, and the plan states which arrangement it assumes and why.
Does the plan include clinical protocols for the shunt or catheter?
No. It records who is contacted when a concern arises and what information travels, but it does not describe how to assess a shunt or perform catheterization. Those protocols belong to the specialty teams and to your course materials. The coordination plan's job is to make sure the right person hears about a problem quickly, and that is what the example is marked on.