NRNP 6810 Week 2 Well-Child Case Write-Up Example

Course	NRNP 6810 Primary Care Approaches for Children
Week	Week 2
Paper type	Well-child case write-up
Length	About 860 words, 6 pages
Format	APA 7 student paper
School	Walden University
Program	Master of Science in Nursing (MSN)
Updated	October 2026

Free sample paper for NRNP 6810 Week 2

Well-Child Case Write-Up: A 12-Month Visit With the Father's Account Labeled, Growth Read as a Channel, and Every Finding Tied to a Named Standard

Student Name

College of Nursing, Walden University

NRNP 6810: Primary Care Approaches for Children

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title promises three things graders look for: attributed history, growth described as a trend, and no finding called normal without a standard. The word normal with no reference named is marked as an assertion.

Well-Child Case Write-Up: A 12-Month Visit With the Father's Account Labeled, Growth Read as a Channel, and Every Finding Tied to a Named Standard

The Father's Account

Composite patient: a 12-month-old girl brought by her father for her well visit; her mother is at work. All history in this section is the father's, recorded as he gave it. She pulls to stand at the couch and walks along it holding on, "all day long." She says "dada" to him and "ba" for her ball and bottle, and he believes she means them. She waves bye-bye and plays pat-a-cake. She eats table foods cut small three times a day, and drinks whole cow's milk from a bottle, about 28 ounces a day by his estimate, including a bottle she takes to bed at night and keeps in the crib. She has four teeth. No illnesses since her 9-month visit. She lives with both parents in an apartment built in 1962; there is no smoking in the home.

Measurements With Their History

Plotted on the WHO growth standards, which describe how healthy breastfed children grow under good conditions and are recommended for children under 2 in the United States (WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group, 2006). Weight 8.9 kg, about the 50th percentile; she has tracked between the 40th and 50th percentiles since her 2-month visit. Length 74.0 cm, about the 50th percentile, tracking the same channel since birth. Head circumference 45.0 cm, about the 50th percentile, in the same channel since birth. Weight-for-length about the 50th percentile. None of the three has crossed a major percentile line in 12 months, which is the finding that matters more than any single percentile.

What this page is doingEach measurement is described by its channel since birth, not only by today's percentile.

Development by Domain

Compared against the CDC milestones for 12 months, which list skills that at least 75% of children show by that age (Zubler et al., 2022). Each line states the source of the evidence.

Gross motor: pulls to stand and walks holding furniture. Reported by father; observed in the room, cruising along the exam table bench.

Fine motor: picks up small objects between thumb and pointer finger. Observed, picking up a cereal piece from the table.

Language: calls a parent by a special name. Reported ("dada"); observed once during the visit. Understands "no": reported only.

Social and emotional: waves bye-bye. Observed at the end of the visit. Plays pat-a-cake: reported only.

Cognitive: looks for a toy hidden under a cloth. Observed.

All listed milestones are met, most with direct observation.

Screening and Immunizations

Bright Futures places several screens at the 12-month visit (Hagan et al., 2017). Anemia: universal hemoglobin screening at about 12 months, with an iron risk assessment, is recommended (Baker et al., 2010). Point-of-care hemoglobin today: 11.4 g/dL, above the 11.0 g/dL cutoff for anemia at this age. Lead: risk assessment positive, because the family lives in housing built before 1978; a blood lead test was drawn today, result pending, with a call to the father when it returns. Oral health: four teeth, no visible decay; fluoride varnish applied; the father was given the name of a dentist accepting infants. Developmental surveillance: done above.

Immunizations: the record, reconciled against the CDC child schedule for 2025, shows all doses through 9 months complete (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025). Due today and given with the father's consent: measles, mumps, and rubella dose 1; varicella dose 1; hepatitis A dose 1; pneumococcal conjugate dose 4; Haemophilus influenzae type b booster. The vaccine information statements were given, and the next due doses were written on her record card.

Assessment

A healthy 12-month-old girl with growth tracking steadily along the 50th percentile channel on the WHO standards for weight, length, and head circumference, developmental milestones for 12 months met on report and observation, hemoglobin above the anemia cutoff, and immunizations up to date after today's doses. One finding needs following.

One Finding Worth Following

Her milk intake and the bottle at night. About 28 ounces of cow's milk a day is more than recommended for a toddler, and a large daily volume of cow's milk is a recognized risk factor for iron deficiency, since milk displaces iron-rich foods (Baker et al., 2010). Her hemoglobin is normal today, but hemoglobin can stay in range while iron stores fall. The bottle in bed also exposes her teeth to milk through the night. The plan: move from bottle to cup over the next month, starting with the bedtime bottle, which the father chose as the first step; bring cow's milk down to between 16 and 24 ounces daily; offer iron-rich foods such as meats, beans, and iron-fortified cereal at two meals a day. Follow-up: a phone check in 4 weeks on the transition, and a repeat iron assessment at the 15-month visit if intake has not fallen.

Because her mother gives the bedtime routine on three nights a week, the father asked for the plan in writing to take home, and it was given with the milk target and the first step circled. Who else feeds her, including a neighbor who watches her two afternoons a week, was asked about, since a plan the neighbor does not know will not change what she drinks on those days.

References

Baker, R. D., Greer, F. R., & Committee on Nutrition. (2010). Diagnosis and prevention of iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia in infants and young children (0-3 years of age). Pediatrics, 126(5), 1040-1050. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2576

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Child and adolescent immunization schedule by age: Recommendations for ages 18 years or younger, United States, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html

Hagan, J. F., Jr., Shaw, J. S., & Duncan, P. M. (Eds.). (2017). Bright Futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents (4th ed.). American Academy of Pediatrics.

WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. (2006). WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatrica, 95(S450), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02378.x

Zubler, J. M., Wiggins, L. D., Macias, M. M., Whitaker, T. M., Shaw, J. S., Squires, J. K., Pajek, J. A., Wolf, R. B., Slaughter, K. S., Broughton, A. S., Gerndt, K. L., Mlodoch, B. J., & Lipkin, P. H. (2022). Evidence-informed milestones for developmental surveillance tools. Pediatrics, 149(3), Article e2021052138. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-052138

What the NRNP 6810 Week 2 instructions ask for

Week 2 of NRNP 6810 commonly asks for a well-child visit write-up at a specific age. You document history with its source, measurements with prior values, development by domain, screening and immunizations due, an assessment and anticipatory guidance. Faculty penalize findings called normal without a named standard. Cite Bright Futures, growth charts and immunization schedules in APA 7. The correct growth chart for age must be used. One finding to follow is often requested. Some sections leave milestone ages and schedules out to test reasoning. NRNP 6810 faculty want each section to name its standard, such as the WHO chart for growth or a milestone checklist for development. Label history with its source. Name the finding to follow and when it will be checked.

How the NRNP 6810 Week 2 example is put together

Subjective material comes from the father and is labeled as his: pulling to stand, cruising along furniture, two words used with meaning, a bottle still taken to bed. Objective findings follow with weight, length and head circumference plotted on the WHO growth standards and each described by its percentile channel since birth. Development is written domain by domain, and each line says whether the evidence was reported, observed in the room, or both. A screening section lists the items Bright Futures places at this visit, anemia and lead among them, with results or plans. Immunizations are reconciled against the CDC schedule. The assessment is a single paragraph arguing that the child is well and on track, and it names the one item that needs follow-up, the bedtime bottle and oral health.

NRNP 6810 Week 2 rubric: what earns full marks

Well-visit rubrics are hard on the word normal. Findings described as normal or appropriate, with no standard named, are treated as assertions, and the example avoids the problem by attaching a reference to every section. Growth interpretation is read closely: a percentile quoted without its trend since birth earns less than one described as a channel. Development loses points when caregiver report and direct observation are blended, which is the distinction this course leans on throughout. Screening completeness is marked against the age, so an item Bright Futures places at this visit and the write-up omits costs a row outright. Immunization errors are penalized hard. The guidance section is checked for relevance; generic advice unconnected to what the visit found scores lower than one focused item argued well.

NRNP 6810 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost marks

Well-visit write-ups lose marks when findings are called normal or appropriate with no standard named. Name the chart or checklist. Another common gap is reading one percentile without the channel over time. Plot prior points. Writers also forget to label history as the father's. Attribute it. Avoid using the CDC chart for a child under two when the WHO chart applies. Check immunizations against the current schedule. Include anticipatory guidance for the next stage. Close with the finding to follow and when. Writers also forget lead and anemia screening at 12 months, which are commonly due. Check them. Another frequent slip is anticipatory guidance copied from another age. Fit it to 12 months, such as safety as she starts to walk.

Get a NRNP 6810 Week 2 example written to your instructions

Supply the Week 2 prompt, the rubric, and the visit age your section set, and a well-child write-up is drafted to it with every standard named in place. First custom sample: free, delivered within 24-48 hours, for reading alongside the well visit you are documenting yourself.

More NRNP 6810 papers and MSN samples

NRNP 6810 Week 2 questions, answered

Why does every section name a standard?

Because a well-child write-up argues that findings are expected for the age, and that argument needs something to measure against. Growth is read against the WHO standards, screening against Bright Futures, immunizations against the CDC schedule. Without those anchors the word normal is only the author's opinion, and graders in this course mark it that way.

Does the write-up list milestone ages or screening schedules?

No. Those expectations live in published references, and the example cites them where each judgment is made without copying ages, intervals or ranges onto the page as advice. References are revised, and figures pasted into a sample go stale quietly. Your own write-up takes the specifics from whichever editions your prompt or program names.

Is the father's report taken from a real visit?

No visit stands behind it. The one-year-old and the father were written as a composite, typical enough to be useful and specific enough to argue from, with nothing that identifies a household. Should your prompt supply a vignette, the sample works from it; if not, it invents a family to fit the visit age your section set.

Where can I find a free NRNP 6810 Week 2 sample paper?

The 12-month well-child write-up is reproduced here with the father's account labeled, growth read as a channel and every finding tied to a standard.

How is growth read in NRNP 6810 Week 2?

As a channel on the WHO chart over time rather than as single percentiles.