| Course | NRNP 6539 Advanced Primary Care of Adults |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 2 |
| Paper type | SOAP note |
| Length | About 880 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NRNP 6539 Week 2
SOAP Note: A Flagged Cholesterol Result and a Father Lost Young in a 46-Year-Old Smoker
Student Name
College of Nursing, Walden University
NRNP 6539: Advanced Nurse Practice in Primary Care Adult Gerontology I
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
SOAP Note: A Flagged Cholesterol Result and a Father Lost Young in a 46-Year-Old Smoker
Subjective
Reason for visit: J.K., a composite 46-year-old white man who works as a hospital security officer on rotating shifts, comes in because a cholesterol result from a workplace screening was flagged high, and because a heart attack killed his father at 49. He wants to know whether he is "headed the same way."
Tobacco: smokes about 15 cigarettes a day for 25 years, about 19 pack-years; has tried to quit twice without medication. Diet on shift: gas station breakfast sandwiches, fast food on night shifts, and energy drinks; rarely eats vegetables at home. Activity: walks his rounds but does no deliberate exercise. Alcohol: two or three beers on days off.
Symptoms: denies chest pain or pressure, breathlessness with exertion, palpitations, and calf pain when walking. No history of diabetes, kidney disease, or stroke. No medications. Family history: father died of myocardial infarction at 49; mother has type 2 diabetes; no known familial hypercholesterolemia.
Objective
Blood pressure 138/86 and 136/84, seated, appropriate cuff. Heart rate 78. Body mass index 29.8; waist circumference 40 inches. Heart regular without murmur; peripheral pulses normal; no carotid bruits; no xanthomas or corneal arcus, findings that would suggest familial hypercholesterolemia at his age (Dains et al., 2020).
Fasting lipid panel as supplied: total cholesterol 248 mg/dL, LDL cholesterol 168 mg/dL, HDL cholesterol 38 mg/dL, triglycerides 210 mg/dL. Hemoglobin A1c 5.8 percent. Creatinine normal.
Assessment
1. Hyperlipidemia with elevated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Using the Pooled Cohort Equations with his inputs, age 46, male, white, total cholesterol 248, HDL 38, untreated systolic blood pressure 137, current smoker, and no diabetes, his estimated 10-year risk is about 12.7 percent. That places him in the intermediate-risk category of 7.5 to under 20 percent, in which the guideline recommends a clinician-patient risk discussion and, if risk is confirmed, a moderate-intensity statin (Grundy et al., 2019).
Risk-enhancing factors named in the guideline strengthen the case: premature heart disease in his father, who died before 55, persistently elevated LDL, metabolic features with an enlarged waist, triglycerides above 175, and borderline blood pressure (Grundy et al., 2019). With several risk enhancers in an intermediate-risk man, the estimate is more likely to understate his risk than overstate it.
A coronary artery calcium score is an option for the uncertain middle, where it can reclassify risk: a score of zero can support deferring statin therapy in some patients, while a positive score supports treatment. It is not an automatic order here, because his smoking and family history already point toward treatment, and the guideline notes that a zero score is less reassuring in current smokers.
Before attributing the lipid pattern to lifestyle and genetics, secondary causes were considered. Hypothyroidism raises LDL and is common, so a thyroid-stimulating hormone is added to today's orders. Nephrotic-range proteinuria and cholestatic liver disease raise cholesterol; his creatinine is normal, a urinalysis for protein is added, and liver enzymes will be checked with the statin baseline. No medications that raise lipids, such as corticosteroids or anabolic steroids, are being taken. Heavy alcohol use raises triglycerides, and his weekend drinking may contribute to the triglyceride level. His LDL of 168 is high but below the level of 190 at which familial hypercholesterolemia should be strongly suspected, and he has no tendon xanthomas, so genetic testing is not pursued now, although his father's early death keeps it in mind if his LDL fails to respond as expected.
2. Tobacco use disorder, the single most modifiable risk factor he has.
3. Prediabetes and elevated blood pressure, both part of the same metabolic picture.
Plan
Risk discussion: we reviewed his estimate, what it means (about 13 of 100 men with his profile would have a heart attack or stroke in ten years without treatment), the risk enhancers, and the expected benefit of each intervention. He chose to start a statin and to work on quitting smoking.
Statin: moderate-intensity statin therapy, atorvastatin 20 mg daily, the intensity recommended for intermediate-risk adults in primary prevention, with a goal of at least a 30 percent LDL reduction (Grundy et al., 2019). Muscle symptoms to report were reviewed.
Smoking cessation: combination nicotine replacement with a patch and a short-acting form, plus referral to the state quit line; varenicline discussed as an alternative if he prefers, since it is among the most effective single agents for cessation (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2021). Quitting would lower his risk more than any other single step.
Lifestyle: specific swaps for night-shift meals, water in place of energy drinks, and a goal of 150 minutes a week of brisk walking. Referral to a dietitian offered.
Blood pressure and glucose: home blood pressure readings for two weeks; repeat A1c in six months.
Follow-up: a fasting lipid recheck roughly two to three months after starting, to judge response and adherence, and a visit then to review blood pressure and smoking progress.
Baseline safety: liver enzymes are checked before starting the statin, as a baseline rather than for routine repeat monitoring, and a baseline creatine kinase is not routinely needed unless he develops muscle symptoms. He was told that the small increase in diabetes risk with statins is outweighed by the cardiovascular benefit at his level of risk.
References
Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2020). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). Elsevier.
Grundy, S. M., Stone, N. J., Bailey, A. L., Beam, C., Birtcher, K. K., Blumenthal, R. S., Braun, L. T., de Ferranti, S., Faiella-Tommasino, J., Forman, D. E., Goldberg, R., Heidenreich, P. A., Hlatky, M. A., Jones, D. W., Lloyd-Jones, D., Lopez-Pajares, N., Ndumele, C. E., Orringer, C. E., Peralta, C. A., . . . Yeboah, J. (2019). 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 139(25), e1082-e1143. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625
Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2021). Lehne's pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
NRNP 6539 Week 2 instructions, in plain terms
NRNP 6539 Week 2 commonly centers on a cardiovascular risk visit, hyperlipidemia being a frequent pick. You document history including family history and smoking, examination and laboratory results, calculate risk with a validated tool, and plan treatment and lifestyle changes with shared decision making. Faculty grade the risk estimate heavily. Cite the ACC/AHA cholesterol guideline in APA 7; a few pages is typical. Risk enhancers and tests that refine risk, such as a calcium score, may be discussed. Smoking cessation should be addressed where relevant. Follow-up laboratory checks close the plan. NRNP 6539 faculty want the risk calculation shown with its inputs so it can be checked. Name the risk category and the guideline's recommendation for that category. Describe the shared decision conversation, including what matters to the patient. Address shift work and diet as part of lifestyle advice.
Inside the NRNP 6539 Week 2 example
Subjective data begin with why he came: the flagged result and a father lost young to a heart attack. Tobacco use is quantified, diet is described by what he actually eats on shift, and he reports no chest pain, no exertional breathlessness, and no leg pain on walking. Measured data follow: blood pressure taken twice, waist circumference, and the lipid panel as the case supplies it. The assessment is built around the Pooled Cohort Equations, reported as an estimate with its inputs listed, followed by the risk-enhancing factors the guideline names, his family history among them. A coronary artery calcium score appears as an option for the uncertain middle, not an automatic order. The plan records a clinician-patient risk discussion, statin intensity by guideline category, cessation support, and a repeat lipid check.
NRNP 6539 Week 2 rubric: what earns full marks
The risk estimate is where this note gains or forfeits most of its assessment credit. A plan that prescribes because the LDL looked high has treated a number, while the guideline asks for treatment matched to estimated risk, and graders in adult primary care read the difference immediately. Here the inputs are shown and the category is named. Enhancers earn credit when they visibly change the discussion and lose it when they are listed for completeness. Tobacco draws its own check: a smoker's lipid note without a cessation plan leaves the most modifiable risk factor in the case untouched. Further credit slips away with a statin named but no intensity category, with no baseline or follow-up labs, and with a shared decision claimed but never documented in the patient's words.
NRNP 6539 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost marks
Lipid notes lose most of their assessment credit when a statin is prescribed because the LDL looked high. Calculate ten-year risk and state the category. Another common gap is ignoring family history of premature heart disease, a recognized risk enhancer. Writers also skip smoking cessation or mention it in one line, though it may lower risk more than the statin. Give it a plan. Avoid ordering a calcium score without saying how it would change management. Keep laboratory values consistent. Include a shared decision conversation. Close with when lipids will be rechecked. Students also forget to repeat a fasting or nonfasting lipid panel before acting on a workplace screen. Mention it. Another frequent gap is not addressing blood pressure, which feeds the risk score. Record it.
Get a NRNP 6539 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Your Week 2 prompt, its rubric, and the cardiovascular case your section assigned are all the desk needs, whether the case is lipids, blood pressure, or both. A SOAP note comes back with the risk estimate shown, its inputs traceable, and each decision tied to its source. The first custom sample is free, turned around in 24-48 hours.
More NRNP 6539 papers and MSN samples
- NRNP 6539 Week 1: Adult Primary Care Post
- NRNP 6539 Week 3: Hyperthyroidism Note
- NRNP 6539 Week 4: COPD Exacerbation SOAP Note
- NRNP 6539 Week 5: CKD and Gout SOAP Note
- NRNP 6539 Week 6: Knee Imaging Discussion
- NRNP 6539 Week 7: Reflux Dyspepsia Note
- NRNP 6539 Week 8: Depression Screening Note
- NRNP 6539 Week 9: Health Maintenance Plan
- NRNP 6539 Week 10: Obesity Care Plan
- NRNP 6539 Week 11: Guideline Disagreement Replies
- NRNP 6540 Week 2: Memory Complaint Note
- NRNP 6537 Week 2: Unstable Tachycardia Case
- NRNP 6547 Week 2: Life-History Interview
- NRNP 6531 Week 2: Hypertension SOAP Note
NRNP 6539 Week 2 questions, answered
What are the Pooled Cohort Equations?
They are the risk calculator the ACC/AHA guidelines use to estimate an adult's chance of an atherosclerotic cardiovascular event, built from age, sex, race, cholesterol values, blood pressure, treatment status, diabetes, and smoking. The example reports the estimate with every input listed so a grader can confirm it. Some sections ask for a different calculator, and a sample follows whichever tool the course materials name.
Why is a calcium score mentioned but not ordered?
Because the guideline positions coronary artery calcium scoring as a tie-breaker when an estimate lands in an uncertain range and the decision remains unclear after discussion. The example raises it as an option the patient can accept or decline, and records his answer. Ordering it for everyone would ignore that positioning, and graders familiar with the guideline tend to notice.
Why does a lipid note include smoking cessation?
Because the visit is about cardiovascular risk, not cholesterol alone, and tobacco is part of the same estimate. The example records his use, his readiness to quit, and a cessation plan cited to the USPSTF recommendation on tobacco counseling and treatment for adults. A lipid note that ignores smoking in a smoker leaves an obvious risk factor unaddressed, and rubrics catch it.
Where can I find a free NRNP 6539 Week 2 sample paper?
J.K.'s hyperlipidemia note is reproduced here with the risk calculation, the risk enhancers, the calcium score discussion and the cessation plan.
Is a statin started right away in NRNP 6539 Week 2?
The note estimates ten-year risk first, counts family history as a risk enhancer and pairs the statin discussion with smoking cessation.