| Course | MHRM 6601 Benefits, Compensation, and Resource Allocation |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 8 |
| Paper type | Cost memo |
| Length | About 640 words, 4 pages |
| Format | Memo, APA 7 citations |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | MS in Human Resource Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MHRM 6601 Week 8
Memorandum
To: Chief Financial Officer, Stone Arch Credit Union
From: Compensation Analyst
Date: October 5, 2026
Re: 2027 cost of the pay and benefits recommendations
Bottom Line
At target, the four recommendations plus the regular merit budget cost about $1.16 million in 2027, inside your $1.2 million envelope for pay and benefit increases. At the incentive maximum, the total rises to about $1.45 million, over the envelope by roughly $250,000. Piloting the branch incentive in four branches rather than all twelve in 2027 brings the maximum case to about $1.07 million, inside the envelope in every scenario.
Two Kinds of Cost
Some costs, once granted, become part of next year's base and the year after's: raising pay to a range minimum, a market adjustment or a larger employer share of premiums. Others are paid only if earned and start from zero each year: the incentive. The first kind commits future budgets; the second does not. A dollar of base increase in 2027 is a dollar in every later year, plus whatever raises are later applied to it (Milkovich et al., 2020).
The Costs
Table 1
2027 Cost of the Recommendations
| Item | Type | Base or payout | With charges on pay | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fourteen employees raised to range minimum | Carries forward | $38,000 | $42,400 | Eleven tellers, three member service representatives | |
| Market adjustments for tellers and compliance analysts | Carries forward | $159,000 | $177,500 | Tellers to about 96 percent of market median | |
| Branch team incentive, twelve branches | Re-earned | $260,000 at target; $520,000 at maximum | $290,300; $580,600 | Paid quarterly | |
| Holding the employer premium share steady | Carries forward | $156,000 | $156,000 | Employer share of a 6 percent premium increase | |
| Regular merit budget | Carries forward | $497,000 | $497,000 | Already approved, charges included in the approved figure | |
Composite organization. Charges on pay combine employer payroll taxes (7.65 percent) with the retirement match (4 percent).
The Charges Riding on Pay
Every dollar of base pay or incentive also triggers payroll taxes and the retirement match, together about 11.65 percent. These charges are easy to omit when a raise is discussed in round numbers, and they add about $23,000 to the base items and $30,000 to $60,000 to the incentive. Premium contributions carry no such charges.
Testing the Total
At target the total is about $1,163,000. At the incentive maximum it is about $1,454,000. The maximum case is unlikely in the first year, since every branch would have to exceed every target, but a budget should survive its worst plausible case.
The Phasing Change
Pilot the branch incentive in four branches in 2027, as the incentive design already suggested for evaluation purposes. That cuts the incentive's cost to about $97,000 at target and $194,000 at the maximum, including charges. The maximum-case total then falls to about $1,067,000, within the envelope with room to spare. The minimum and market adjustments should not be phased: they address pay below the range and below the market, which employees can see and which drives turnover now. Gerhart and Rynes (2003) note that pay below a declared range invites the strongest sense of unfairness of any pay problem.
Future Years
The three new carry-forward items add about $375,000 to the 2028 base before any new increase. If the pilot succeeds and the incentive expands to all branches in 2028, its target cost returns to about $290,000. That should be planned now, so the 2028 envelope is set with it in view.
What This Memo Does Not Cover
Turnover savings are not counted. Shaw and Gupta (2007) found that how pay is structured shapes which employees choose to leave, not only how many, so better-paid tellers may also mean that the stronger ones stay. If the teller adjustments reduce first-year turnover even modestly, they would offset part of their cost, but that is a forecast, and this memo prices only commitments.
References
Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. Sage.
Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2020). Compensation (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Shaw, J. D., & Gupta, N. (2007). Pay system characteristics and quit patterns of good, average, and poor performers. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 903-928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00095.x
The Walden MHRM 6601 Week 8 instructions
Week 8 asks you to cost a set of compensation recommendations for a finance reader. Put the bottom line first: does the total fit the budget, and in which scenarios? Separate costs that become part of future base pay from those earned again each year, because they affect future budgets differently. Add the costs that ride on pay, such as payroll taxes and retirement contributions. Test the total at target and at the maximum. If it does not fit, propose a change and explain why you chose that item rather than another. Look ahead to the following year, and say what you have not counted.
Inside the MHRM 6601 Week 8 example
The memo opens with totals at target and maximum and the effect of the proposed pilot. A section explains carry-forward versus re-earned costs, citing Milkovich and colleagues. A table lists five items with type, base cost, cost with charges and notes. A section explains the 11.65 percent in charges on pay. A section tests the total in both scenarios. A section proposes piloting the incentive and explains why the minimum and market fixes should not be phased, citing Gerhart and Rynes. A section adds about $375,000 of new carry-forward cost to the 2028 base, and a final section sets turnover savings aside, citing Shaw and Gupta. Each row of the table shows its base figure beside the figure with charges, so the reader sees the hidden cost at a glance.
MHRM 6601 Week 8 rubric: what earns full marks
Cost memos are graded on accuracy and usefulness to a finance reader. A bottom line stated first earns credit. Distinguishing carry-forward from re-earned costs shows financial understanding and is weighted heavily. Including payroll taxes and contributions reflects real cost. Testing at target and maximum shows prudence. A phasing proposal with a clear rationale for what is phased and what is not demonstrates judgment. Looking ahead to future years is valued. Honesty about what is excluded, such as forecast savings, builds credibility. Memos that present only base pay, or count hoped-for savings as offsets, receive lower marks.
Common MHRM 6601 Week 8 mistakes, and how to avoid them
List every recommendation and its cost. Mark each as permanent, meaning it raises base pay or ongoing contributions, or one-time, meaning it must be earned again. Add payroll taxes and any contributions linked to pay. Total everything at target, then at the maximum payout. Compare both with the budget. If you are over, ask which item carries the most uncertainty and whether it can be piloted or delayed without harming employees who are underpaid now. Then estimate what the permanent items add to next year. Many memos forget the costs that ride on pay. If you want a second check on your figures, send them to us. One table and about two pages of explanation is usually enough.
Get a MHRM 6601 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Attach the cost memo prompt, its rubric and the recommendations your earlier weeks produced, along with the budget ceiling your section set, if any. The memo totals them, separates carried-forward from re-earned costs and tests the plan at target and cap, returned within 24 to 48 hours and free the first time. All of its numbers are made up and marked illustrative.
More MHRM 6601 papers and MS in Human Resource Management samples
- MHRM 6601 Week 1: Uniform Raise Discussion Post
- MHRM 6601 Week 2: Point-Factor Job Evaluation
- MHRM 6601 Week 3: Salary Market Analysis
- MHRM 6601 Week 4: Pay Structure Design
- MHRM 6601 Week 5: EAP and Health Premium Brief
- MHRM 6601 Week 6: Market Percentile Peer Reply
- MHRM 6601 Week 7: Team Incentive Design
- MHRM 6601 Week 9: Pay Structure Communication Plan
- MHRM 6601 Week 10: Pay Equity Review
- MHRM 6601 Week 11: Total Rewards Plan
- MHRM 6101 Week 8: Selection Ethics Memo
MHRM 6601 Week 8 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MHRM 6601 Week 8 sample paper?
The compensation cost memo and its table appear below at no cost.
Does the MHRM 6601 Week 8 total fit the budget?
At target it is about $1.16 million, inside the $1.2 million envelope; at the maximum it is about $1.45 million, over it.
What costs ride on pay?
Payroll taxes at 7.65 percent and a 4 percent retirement match, about 11.65 percent in total.
What phasing change does the memo propose?
Piloting the branch incentive in four branches in 2027 instead of all twelve.
Why not phase the minimum and market fixes?
Because they address pay below the range and below the market, which employees see and which drives turnover now.