| Course | MGMT 8805M Agile and Disruptive Innovation Management |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 3 |
| Paper type | Entry analysis |
| Length | About 750 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | PhD in Management |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MGMT 8805M Week 3
Which Tier Falls Next: An Entry Analysis Segmenting an Ultrasound Maker's Customers by Revenue, Margin and How Much of the Offered Image Quality Each Actually Uses, Locating the Overserved Foothold and the Nonconsumers, and Projecting the Entrant's Route Upward
Student Name
Walden University
MGMT 8805M: Agile and Disruptive Innovation Management
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Which Tier Falls Next: An Entry Analysis Segmenting an Ultrasound Maker's Customers by Revenue, Margin and How Much of the Offered Image Quality Each Actually Uses, Locating the Overserved Foothold and the Nonconsumers, and Projecting the Entrant's Route Upward
Incumbent and Entrant
This analysis takes the position of Brightwater Medical Imaging's strategy staff in early 2026. The entrant is Pocketsound, whose handheld probe has already won primary care practices and some emergency departments. The question is which of Brightwater's customer tiers Pocketsound is positioned to take next, and by what route.
Segments and Their Basis
Tiers are drawn by clinical use, not by hospital size, because the image quality a buyer needs depends on what the scan is for. Each tier's usage measure is the share of the system's imaging presets and advanced functions its users touched at least monthly, from Brightwater's own service logs.
[after]
Revenue and margin figures come from Brightwater's segment reporting to its board; usage comes from service log data on 2,300 installed systems. Margins include service contracts.
Table 1
Brightwater Customer Tiers, 2025
| Tier | Share of revenue | Gross margin | Share of advanced functions used monthly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiology and general imaging | 34% | 61% | 72% |
| Cardiology (echocardiography) | 21% | 63% | 81% |
| Obstetrics and gynecology | 18% | 55% | 58% |
| Emergency departments | 14% | 38% | 9% |
| Anesthesia and vascular access | 9% | 42% | 6% |
| Outpatient clinics | 4% | 30% | 12% |
The Overserved Foothold
The bottom of the table shows the overserved tiers Christensen and Raynor (2003) describe as the classic foothold for low-end entry: customers who pay for performance they do not use. Emergency departments and anesthesia teams use fewer than one in ten advanced functions, and Brightwater earns its lowest product margins from them. Pocketsound has already entered the first and is a natural fit for the second, since needle guidance for nerve blocks and line placement needs a clear, shallow image rather than diagnostic depth.
The Nonconsumers
A second foothold sits outside the table: ambulance services, rural clinics and primary care practices that never bought ultrasound. They were not overserved; they were not served at all. Pocketsound's early sales came from this group, which matters because nonconsumers compare a handheld with nothing, not with a cart, and so judge it far more generously.
How Much Is at Stake in Each Foothold
The two lowest tiers together account for 23% of Brightwater's revenue but a smaller share of its gross profit, about 15%, because their margins are lower. That gap is the arithmetic behind the incumbent's indifference. The nonconsumer foothold is harder to size, since it shows up in no Brightwater report. A rough count from state licensing data finds about 1,900 ambulance services and 2,600 rural clinics in Brightwater's sales territory, few of which own ultrasound. At Pocketsound's price, equipping even a third of them would produce a customer base several times larger than Brightwater's installed emergency department systems, which is the kind of volume that funds the entrant's next round of improvements.
Why Brightwater Would Welcome the Loss
Brightwater's own priorities make the low tiers easy to give up. Its 2025 plan targets gross margin above 58% and directs new engineering spending toward cardiology and radiology, where margins and usage are highest. Losing emergency and anesthesia business would raise its average margin. Christensen (1997) described exactly this pattern: incumbents rationally move upmarket, away from the customers an entrant takes, and feel better off doing so.
The Projected Route
Adner (2002) argued that whether an entrant can move up depends on demand: on how much the requirements of the low-end and mainstream segments overlap, and on whether mainstream customers would value the entrant's improvements. Applied here, anesthesia's requirements overlap heavily with emergency medicine's, so the next step is short. Obstetrics is the likely step after that, since routine dating and growth scans use modest image quality, while cardiology's dependence on advanced functions makes it the hardest to reach. The projected order is anesthesia by 2027, routine obstetric scans by 2029 and, possibly, cardiology screening after that.
What Would Change the Projection
If Pocketsound's next product releases target diagnostic features rather than ease of use, it may skip anesthesia and aim at obstetrics directly. If obstetric departments decline handhelds for liability reasons, the route stalls below Brightwater's core.
Limits
Usage data shows what functions are touched, not which ones matter for a decision. A survey of obstetric sonographers on which functions they would give up would test the projection. The nonconsumer count is also rough, since licensing records do not show which services already own a probe of some kind.
References
Adner, R. (2002). When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 667-688. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.246
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business School Press.
What the MGMT 8805M Week 3 instructions ask for
In Week 3 you analyze where an entrant can gain a foothold in an incumbent's market and how it could move upward. Name the incumbent and the entrant, or the kind of entrant you anticipate. Segment the incumbent's customers on a stated basis, and build a table showing each tier's share of revenue, margin and how much of the offered performance it uses. Identify either an overserved low-end tier, a group of nonconsumers or both, and say which path each implies. Explain, using the incumbent's own priorities, why it would accept losing that tier. Then project the entrant's route upward using research on demand and segment overlap. State what would change the projection. Five to seven pages is typical.
How the MGMT 8805M Week 3 example is put together
The sample takes the viewpoint of Brightwater's strategy staff in early 2026. Tiers are drawn by clinical use, with usage measured from service logs on 2,300 systems. The segment table shows emergency departments and anesthesia teams using under a tenth of advanced functions at the lowest margins. A section names that as the overserved foothold, and another names ambulance services, rural clinics and primary care as nonconsumers who compare a handheld with nothing. A section sizes both footholds against Brightwater's gross profit. Brightwater's 58 percent margin target explains its willingness to lose them. Adner's demand-based view projects the route: anesthesia, then routine obstetrics, then possibly cardiology. Conditions that would change the projection and limits close the analysis.
Where the marks sit in the MGMT 8805M Week 3 rubric
Graders read the segment table first. Tiers must have a stated basis that fits the product, and each needs revenue, margin and a usage measure with a source. Strong analyses distinguish overserved customers from nonconsumers and explain why the two imply different entrant paths. The argument that the incumbent would welcome the loss should rest on the incumbent's own reported priorities, not on speculation. Projections of the route upward should use research on demand overlap and state their order and timing. Conditions that would change the projection show the analysis can be tested. Tables without usage data, or analyses that treat every low-price customer as a disruption foothold, score lower, as do projections offered without reasons.
MGMT 8805M Week 3 help: mistakes that cost marks
The hardest part of this analysis is finding a usage measure. Service logs, feature telemetry, buyer surveys and sales notes can show how much of a product customers actually use. Draw tiers by what customers do with the product, not by their size, unless size drives use. Keep nonconsumers in a separate section, since they do not appear in the incumbent's revenue. Look in the incumbent's plans or investor materials for its margin targets, which explain what it would give up. For the projected route, ask which tier's needs most resemble the entrant's current customers. If you get stuck, a tutor can help you choose a basis for segmentation and build the table, and the Brightwater analysis above lays out every tier.
Get a MGMT 8805M Week 3 example written to your instructions
Upload the Week 3 prompt and rubric along with the firm you were assigned, and the desk turns around a segment analysis in 24-48h, free for a first request. Add whether your section fixes a segmentation basis or leaves it open. The public revenue and margin figures behind the sample may not match the sources your section expects.
More MGMT 8805M papers and PhD in Management samples
- MGMT 8805M Week 1: Discussion Post
- MGMT 8805M Week 2: Innovation Case
- MGMT 8805M Week 4: Response Memo
- MGMT 8805M Week 5: Portfolio Brief
- MGMT 8805M Week 6: Sprint Critique
- MGMT 8805M Week 7: Business Model Case
- MGMT 8805M Week 8: Adoption Analysis
- MGMT 8805M Week 9: Peer Reply
- MGMT 8805M Week 10: Investment Memo
- MGMT 8805M Week 11: Closing Case
- MGMT 8815M Week 3: Field Research Memo
- MGMT 8725M Week 3: Capability Audit
- MGMT 8705M Week 3: Research Synthesis
- MGMT 8625M Week 3: Decision Rights Map
MGMT 8805M Week 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free MGMT 8805M Week 3 sample paper?
The Brightwater entry analysis above, with its segment table, is the finished Week 3 sample.
Which tiers are overserved in the MGMT 8805M Week 3 sample?
Emergency departments and anesthesia teams, which use fewer than one in ten advanced imaging functions.
Who are the nonconsumers in the sample?
Ambulance services, rural clinics and primary care practices that never bought ultrasound.
Why would Brightwater accept losing the low tiers?
Its plan targets gross margin above 58 percent, and losing low-margin tiers would raise its average.
What route does the sample project for the entrant?
Anesthesia by 2027, routine obstetric scans by 2029 and possibly cardiology screening after that.