Criteria first, sources later: MBAX 6712's Week 2 criteria statement example fixes four performable tests for a middle-school civics class and binds the paper to meeting them itself. Searches like "mbax 6712 week 2 assignment example", "mbax6712 week 2 sample" and "mbax 6712 week 2 example" land here.
What a finished MBAX 6712 Week 2 criteria statement looks like
Three pages: a short preamble, then four numbered criteria. Each criterion follows one pattern: an action phrased for learners, its research basis, and thresholds for met, unclear or failed. The first asks who is behind a source, found by leaving the page instead of reading its about section. The second asks what independent coverage says. The third traces a claim, quote or image to its original context, and the fourth asks whether the source is an authority on this particular question. That last criterion draws on the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education and its frame holding that authority is constructed and contextual. A contrast paragraph explains why the statement does not adopt a page-inspection checklist such as the CRAAP test. A closing commitment names Week 10.
How a MBAX 6712 Week 2 example is structured
Criteria appear as actions because the course asks for evaluation that can be performed, and a quality such as reliability cannot be. Every criterion shares one internal order, action, source, thresholds, which lets a reader line them up and a peer later test them. The sequence mirrors how a practiced reader tends to work: identify the source, look sideways at coverage, trace the claim, then judge fit to the question. Authority is placed last because it depends on the first three, since nobody can judge whether a source is expert on a question until they know who it is. The checklist contrast is short and follows the criteria instead of preceding them, so the paper's own standard exists before it disagrees with anyone else's. The closing commitment converts the statement into a promise someone can check.
Actions, not qualities
Each criterion names something a learner does, such as opening a new tab to look up a publisher, instead of a property a source supposedly has.
Four tests in working order
Who is behind it, what others say, where the claim began, and whether this source knows about this question.
Thresholds for each
Met, unclear and failed are defined per criterion, so two teachers applying them to one source would reach the same result.
Authority, in context
The ACRL frame supplies the idea that expertise depends on the question asked. A council clerk knows what an ordinance says, not whether it worked.
A checklist, set aside
One paragraph explains why inspecting a page's own features, the CRAAP approach, is not adopted: polished pages pass such inspections easily.
A promise to the reference list
The statement binds the paper to applying all four tests to its own sources in Week 10.
Where marks go in MBAX 6712 Week 2
Graders of a criteria statement check usability before elegance, asking whether someone other than the author could apply each criterion and reach the same verdict. The thresholds make that possible here, because each criterion spells out what met and failed look like. In this course attribution gets close reading, and every criterion names its source for the idea it borrows, and the ACRL frame is described as written for college learners, with the adaptation for younger ones stated. The checklist contrast earns credit for reasoning, since it explains a choice instead of dismissing an alternative. Statements slip when criteria are qualities rather than actions, when two criteria overlap so a source fails twice for one flaw, and when nothing commits the author to the standard being prescribed.
Get a MBAX 6712 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 2 instructions, your rubric, and a line on the learners the criteria are meant for. The desk writes a criteria statement for that group, every test sourced and given thresholds, delivered in 24-48 hours without charge for the first sample. Any class it describes is a composite, never a group you actually teach.
MBAX 6712 Week 2 questions, answered
Is the ACRL Framework suitable for middle-school learners?
Its authors wrote it for higher education, and the example says so directly. What transfers is the central idea of one frame, that authority is constructed and contextual, which can be taught through concrete cases at almost any age. Your statement can draw on it the same way, provided it names the adaptation instead of implying the framework was designed for younger readers.
Why set aside a checklist approach?
Because checklists that inspect a page's own features, such as its date, stated purpose and apparent professionalism, reward polish, and polish is cheap. Research on lateral reading suggests skilled readers judge a source by what others say about it. The example sets the CRAAP test aside on that basis in one paragraph. Your statement can still adopt a checklist if your section requires one, explaining its limits.
How many criteria should a statement have?
Few enough to be performed during a single search. The example uses four, a number chosen so the full set fits on one card beside a keyboard. Nothing here fixes the count, and your prompt decides. What matters is that each criterion does distinct work, so a weak source fails for a stated reason instead of piling up repeated penalties for one flaw.