| Course | INHE 2320 Nutritional Science |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 5 |
| Paper type | Macronutrient distribution paper |
| Length | About 610 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Integrative Health |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for INHE 2320 Week 5
Where the Energy Came From, Checked Twice: A Macronutrient Distribution Paper Setting Three-Day Shares Against the AMDRs and Protein Against Body Weight
Student Name
Walden University
INHE 2320: Nutritional Science
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Where the Energy Came From, Checked Twice: A Macronutrient Distribution Paper Setting Three-Day Shares Against the AMDRs and Protein Against Body Weight
From Grams to Shares
Dana's three-day record, matched item by item to the federal food composition database (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service [USDA ARS], 2019), averaged 171.2 g of carbohydrate, 76.1 g of protein and 57.7 g of fat per day. Converting grams to energy uses the general factors of 4 kcal per gram for carbohydrate and protein and 9 kcal per gram for fat. That gives 685 kcal from carbohydrate, 304 kcal from protein and 519 kcal from fat, a total of 1,508 kcal. The database total for the same foods is 1,499 kcal; the small difference comes from the database using food-specific energy factors rather than general ones, and shares below use the 1,508 total so they sum to 100%.
The Shares Against the Ranges
The Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges for adults are 45% to 65% of energy from carbohydrate, 10% to 35% from protein and 20% to 35% from fat (Institute of Medicine, 2005).
Table 1
Macronutrient shares by day and for the three-day mean
| Day | Carbohydrate | Protein | Fat | Total kcal from factors | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tuesday | 54.9% | 22.5% | 22.6% | 1,399 | |
| Thursday | 43.5% | 18.6% | 37.9% | 1,391 | |
| Saturday | 39.3% | 19.6% | 41.1% | 1,734 | |
| Three-day mean | 45.4% | 20.2% | 34.4% | 1,508 | |
| Acceptable range | 45% to 65% | 10% to 35% | 20% to 35% | Not applicable | |
Daily shares use each day's own totals; the mean row uses mean grams, so it is not the average of the three daily percentages.
On the mean, all three macronutrients fall inside their ranges, but two sit at the edges: carbohydrate at 45.4%, just above the floor, and fat at 34.4%, just below the ceiling. The daily rows show why. Tuesday, built around oatmeal, rice and fruit, sits comfortably inside every range. Thursday and Saturday both exceed the fat ceiling and fall below the carbohydrate floor, driven by a fast-food hamburger, chips, ranch dressing and ground beef on Thursday and by cheese pizza, almonds, eggs and salmon on Saturday. A mean that looks acceptable is made of one day inside the ranges and two outside them.
Protein, Checked a Second Way
As a share of energy, protein at 20.2% is well inside its range. But a percentage depends on total energy, and Dana's recorded energy may be low, as last week's comparison with her estimated needs suggested. Expressed per kilogram of body weight, her mean intake is 76.1 g รท 68 kg = 1.12 g/kg. The Recommended Dietary Allowance for adults is 0.8 g/kg (Institute of Medicine, 2005), so her protein intake exceeds it on the mean and on every day, from 0.95 g/kg on Thursday to 1.25 g/kg on Saturday. The second check confirms the first, and it would still hold if her true energy intake were higher than recorded, since protein grams do not depend on total energy.
What the Distribution Does Not Say
Macronutrient shares say nothing about the quality of each source. Thursday's fat came largely from a fast-food burger and bottled dressing, while Saturday's came partly from salmon and almonds, and those differ in fatty acid profile even though both days exceed the ceiling. Fiber, at 16.8 g a day on average, is below the Adequate Intake of 25 g for women of Dana's age, a gap the distribution itself cannot show. Three days are also too few to describe usual intake; the shares describe this record, not her habits. Experts on dietary assessment note that short records describe the days observed with more confidence than they describe a person's long-run diet (Subar et al., 2015).
References
Institute of Medicine. (2005). Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10490
Subar, A. F., Freedman, L. S., Tooze, J. A., Kirkpatrick, S. I., Boushey, C., Neuhouser, M. L., Thompson, F. E., Potischman, N., Guenther, P. M., Tarasuk, V., Reedy, J., & Krebs-Smith, S. M. (2015). Addressing current criticism regarding the value of self-report dietary data. The Journal of Nutrition, 145(12), 2639-2645. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.219634
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. (2019). FoodData Central: SR Legacy. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/
Reading the INHE 2320 Week 5 instructions
Macronutrient assignments ask students to calculate the share of energy coming from carbohydrate, protein and fat and to compare those shares with recommended ranges. Prompts usually ask students to use their own or a subject's record and to show conversions from grams to calories. Some ask for protein in grams per kilogram of body weight. Instructors look for correct arithmetic and for interpretation beyond whether each figure falls in range. Papers that report only a mean percentage, without checking daily variation or the dependence of percentages on total energy, generally earn less credit. A few prompts also want one change proposed that would bring each day into range.
Inside the INHE 2320 Week 5 example
The paper turns mean grams into kilocalories with the standard factors and accounts for why its total differs slightly from the database's. A table gives shares for each day and the mean, alongside the acceptable ranges, with a note on why the mean row is not an average of percentages. A paragraph identifies the foods behind each day's pattern. A section checks protein in grams per kilogram for the mean and each day and explains why this check is independent of energy. A final section notes what shares cannot show, including fat quality and the fiber gap, citing dietary assessment research. Each day's shares are calculated from that day's own grams, so each row can be verified on its own. Body weight for the protein check is the subject's recorded 68 kg.
INHE 2320 Week 5 rubric: what earns full marks
Instructors generally reward correct conversions, and showing the arithmetic secures that share. Reporting daily shares alongside the mean earns substantial credit, because it shows the mean hides two days outside the ranges. Checking protein by body weight, and explaining why, tends to separate the best papers. Explaining the difference between two energy totals shows care. Naming foods behind each day's pattern ties numbers to choices. Acknowledging what the distribution cannot show completes the analysis, and correct citations for the reference ranges, the database and the assessment literature support it. Using each day's own totals for daily shares, rather than the mean, shows care with denominators.
INHE 2320 Week 5 help from the desk
Convert each macronutrient from grams to calories and show the factors you used. Calculate shares for each day as well as the mean. Compare each with the acceptable range and look for days that fall outside. Check protein in grams per kilogram, since that does not depend on total energy. Name the foods that drove any day outside a range. Say what the shares cannot tell you. If your shares do not add to 100% or your mean hides your daily pattern, we can produce a sample paper from your record. Check that your daily shares each add to 100%.
Get a INHE 2320 Week 5 example written to your instructions
The figures in the sample belong to an invented subject, so nothing from your own record is needed. Send the Week 5 prompt with its rubric and any analysis tool your section mandates. Each share is carried from grams to percent, protein is checked per kilogram, and the contributing foods are identified. Free for a first request, returned within 24-48 hours.
More INHE 2320 papers and BS in Integrative Health samples
- INHE 2320 Week 1: Three-Day Intake Record
- INHE 2320 Week 2: Nutrient Density Comparison
- INHE 2320 Week 3: Food Label Breakdown
- INHE 2320 Week 4: Energy Needs Estimate
- INHE 2320 Week 6: Micronutrient Gap Memo
- INHE 2320 Week 7: Diet Quality Rating
- INHE 2320 Week 8: Plant-Based Diet Appraisal
- INHE 2320 Week 9: Supplement Claim Check Post
- INHE 2320 Week 10: Meal Plan Revision
- INHE 2320 Week 11: Final Nutrition Case
- INHE 3001 Week 5: Staffing Analysis
- INHE 3002 Week 5: Claim Audit
- INHE 2002 Week 5: Goal-Setting Plan
- INHE 2001 Week 5: Objective Set
INHE 2320 Week 5 questions, answered
Where can I find a free INHE 2320 Week 5 sample paper?
The macronutrient distribution paper for Dana's three-day record is reproduced on this page.
What are the acceptable ranges?
45% to 65% of energy from carbohydrate, 10% to 35% from protein and 20% to 35% from fat.
Does the mean fall in range?
Yes, but with carbohydrate at the floor and fat at the ceiling.
Why check protein per kilogram?
Percentages depend on total energy, which may be underreported; grams per kilogram do not.
Which days fell outside the ranges?
Thursday and Saturday, both above the fat ceiling and below the carbohydrate floor.