| Course | INHE 2002 Introduction to Health and Wellness Coaching |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 11 |
| Paper type | Reflection |
| Length | About 550 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Integrative Health |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for INHE 2002 Week 11
What My Coaching Voice Sounds Like Now: A Closing Reflection Built From Three Pieces of Evidence Pulled From Weeks 4, 6 and 8
Student Name
Walden University
INHE 2002: Introduction to Health and Wellness Coaching
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
What My Coaching Voice Sounds Like Now: A Closing Reflection Built From Three Pieces of Evidence Pulled From Weeks 4, 6 and 8
The Question
Instead of summarizing the term, this reflection answers one question: what does my coaching voice sound like now? I answer with three pieces of evidence, each a sentence I actually said or wrote, taken from work produced weeks apart. Each is compared with what I would have said at the start of the course.
Evidence 1: Week 4, Turn 9 and Turn 17
In my Week 4 practice transcript, turn 9 told the client she should "try not to skip" lunch. Eight turns later, turn 17 asked what, "if anything," she would want to carry over from her good Tuesdays. Those two sentences are the clearest record of the change I was trying to make. Turn 9 is my starting voice: helpful, direct and in charge of the answer. Turn 17 hands the decision back, and the words "if anything" leave room for the client to choose nothing. Her answer to turn 9 was the tired "Everyone says that." Her response to turn 17 was a plan she built herself. Motivational interviewing calls the urge behind turn 9 the righting reflex (Miller & Rollnick, 2013), and I now recognize it in myself as it happens rather than afterward.
Evidence 2: Week 6, Declining the Request
In Week 6, a practice client asked me to just tell her what to do. My reply offered information with permission and declined to pick for her, because she, not I, knew which option could "fit your life" on a weeknight. In Week 1, I would likely have answered her outright or quoted a rule about coaches and advice. The Week 6 sentence does neither. It gives her something useful and keeps the choice hers, the line the coaching scope of practice draws between sharing information and deciding for the client (National Board for Health and Wellness Coaching [NBHWC], 2023).
Evidence 3: Week 8, the Pause
In the Week 8 referral scenario, when Diane offered her own explanation for blacking out, my written reply granted she "may be right," said neither of us could judge it, and named a doctor as the person who could. This sentence shows a part of my voice I did not expect to develop: being direct about a limit without being cold. Earlier in the term I would have tried to reassure her or guessed at a cause. Now I can stop a session without taking over the client's health decisions.
What the Three Have in Common
All three sentences hand something back: the decision in Week 4, the choice among options in Week 6, and the medical question to the right professional in Week 8. My voice now sounds like someone who asks more than tells and who says plainly when a question belongs elsewhere. Reviews of coaching describe the coach as a partner who supports the client's own direction (Wolever et al., 2013). Turn 17 sounds like that. Turn 9 did not.
What Still Needs Work
My Week 3 self-assessment showed I fill silences too quickly, and none of the three pieces of evidence shows that has changed. A voice is also what one does not say, and I have not yet heard mine wait.
References
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
National Board for Health and Wellness Coaching. (2023). Health and wellness coach scope of practice. https://nbhwc.org/scope-of-practice/
Wolever, R. Q., Simmons, L. A., Sforzo, G. A., Dill, D., Kaye, M., Bechard, E. M., Southard, M. E., Kennedy, M., Vosloo, J., & Yang, N. (2013). A systematic review of the literature on health and wellness coaching: Defining a key behavioral intervention in healthcare. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 2(4), 38-57. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2013.042
INHE 2002 Week 11 instructions, in plain terms
End-of-term reflections in coaching courses tend to ask how the student's practice has developed. Prompts often ask what has changed in how they coach, what evidence shows the change and what they still need to work on. Some suggest comparing early and late work. Instructors look for specific evidence rather than general statements of growth. Reflections that summarize each week, or that describe becoming more confident without showing anything the student said or wrote, generally earn less credit than those built on quoted moments from earlier assignments and honest about what has not changed. A few prompts ask students to name a goal for their next course.
How this INHE 2002 Week 11 example is built
The reflection states its single question and its method of using three pieces of evidence from different weeks. Each piece gets its own section, with the writer's words, the client's response where relevant and what the writer would have said at the start of the course. Quotations are kept short and the moments are partly paraphrased. A section finds what the three have in common, that each hands something back, and connects this to coaching's partner stance. A last section admits that comfort with silence, rated weak in Week 3, has not yet changed. At roughly two pages, the piece keeps the first-person voice used in this course's threads. Quotations are kept to a few words each, with the rest paraphrased, so the writer's past and present sentences are clear.
Where the marks sit in the INHE 2002 Week 11 rubric
Instructors generally reward reflections built on evidence. Three quoted moments from different weeks secure the main share, and comparing each with what the writer would have said earlier makes the change visible. Including evidence about limits as well as listening shows growth in more than one direction. Finding a common thread across the three is often what lifts a reflection above a list. Honesty about a skill that has not improved earns credit for self-awareness, especially when it links back to an earlier self-assessment. Accurate citations for the sources that framed each change complete the reflection. Short quotations with paraphrase around them show the writer can describe earlier work without simply copying it.
Common INHE 2002 Week 11 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Go back through your earlier assignments and find sentences you said or wrote to clients. Pick three from different weeks that show change, and set each beside what you would have said at the start. Keep quotations short. Look for what the three share. Then name one thing that has not changed and point to the evidence. Avoid summarizing every week. If you cannot find clear evidence of change in your own work, we can go through your assignments together and draft a sample reflection. Keep quotations short and paraphrase the rest, so the reflection reads as new writing.
Get a INHE 2002 Week 11 example written to your instructions
Send the reflection prompt, any reflective framework your classroom names and the rubric, and one finished INHE 2002 reflection comes back inside 24-48 hours, free for a first sample. Your own term and your own practice conversations are what your version draws on. The sample shows the evidence pattern, the section shape and the register these rubrics reward.
More INHE 2002 papers and BS in Integrative Health samples
- INHE 2002 Week 1: Coaching Definition Post
- INHE 2002 Week 2: Scope Memo
- INHE 2002 Week 3: Listening Self-Assessment
- INHE 2002 Week 4: Session Transcript
- INHE 2002 Week 5: Goal-Setting Plan
- INHE 2002 Week 6: Declining the Answer Post
- INHE 2002 Week 7: Client Scenario
- INHE 2002 Week 8: Referral Scenario
- INHE 2002 Week 9: Coaching Plan
- INHE 2002 Week 10: Peer Critique
- INHE 2001 Week 11: Plan Audit Reflection
- INHE 1005 Week 11: Closing Reflection
INHE 2002 Week 11 questions, answered
Where can I find a free INHE 2002 Week 11 sample paper?
Here: a closing piece on coaching voice, built from moments in Weeks 4, 6 and 8.
What evidence does the reflection use?
Moments from a Week 4 transcript, a Week 6 discussion post and a Week 8 referral scenario.
What do the three moments have in common?
Each hands something back: a decision, a choice or a medical question.
What has not changed?
The writer still fills silences too quickly.
Should a reflection summarize the whole term?
No. This one answers one narrow question with specific evidence.