Six sources on misperceived campus drinking norms, each annotated for the claim it can carry: an INHE 1003 Week 9 annotated source list, one rejection kept on the page. Searches like "inhe 1003 week 9 assignment example", "inhe1003 week 9 sample" and "inhe 1003 week 9 example" land here.
What a finished INHE 1003 Week 9 annotated source list looks like
Six entries in the required citation style, each followed by an annotation of about eighty words. The sources are mixed on purpose: the assigned textbook's section on social influence, a review article on the social norms approach, a single-campus survey study, a government health agency page on college drinking, a peer-reviewed study of a norms-based campaign, and a news feature. Every annotation has the same three parts: what the source is, what it found or states, and which claim in the planned paper it could support. The news feature stays on the list marked as rejected, with a sentence saying it reports a campus program without any design to evaluate. A note at the top states the question the later paper asks, whether first-year drinking follows what peers are believed to drink rather than what they actually drink.
How a INHE 1003 Week 9 example is structured
Question first, in a note above the entries, because an annotation can only say what a source supports if the claim it supports is already on the page. Entries run in the order the later paper would use them, from background to evidence, and the citation conventions still apply inside each entry. Every annotation keeps one three-part pattern, which makes the entries comparable down the page. Sizing is where the list does its real work. The single-campus survey is limited to that campus, the review is permitted to describe the approach broadly, and the agency page is used for context rather than as evidence about the theory. The rejected entry stays because a visible rejection shows that weighing happened. A final line notes which claim in the planned paper still lacks a source, so the gap is recorded rather than hidden.
The question the list serves
A two-sentence note states what the later paper will ask. Every annotation below it is written against that question, which is why none of them reads like an abstract.
Three parts per annotation
What the source is, what it found or states, and which claim it could carry. Holding the shape fixed lets a reader compare six entries at a glance.
Each source at its own size
The review can describe the approach across many studies. The campus survey speaks for one campus. The agency page supplies context and is not treated as a test of the theory.
One entry kept and refused
A news feature about a campus program stays on the list, marked as rejected, because it describes a program without any evidence of what the program did.
The claim still unsupported
The last line names the part of the planned paper that none of the six sources yet covers. Recording the gap is more useful to the later paper than padding the list to hide it.
Where marks go in INHE 1003 Week 9
Annotations earn credit for evaluation, not for summary. An entry that paraphrases the abstract has told a reader what the source says without saying what it can be used for, and most rubrics for this genre separate those two explicitly. The second criterion reads source quality and mix: a list built entirely from web pages, or entirely from one kind of study, suggests the search stopped early. Sizing each source correctly is what distinguishes strong lists. Treating a single-campus survey as evidence about undergraduates everywhere is the overreach this course keeps returning to, and graders look for it here first. Citation style is scored entry by entry, so six small slips add up. The rejected source earns credit in sections that ask for evaluation, since it shows a criterion was applied rather than assumed.
Get a INHE 1003 Week 9 example written to your instructions
An annotated list starts from a question, so include the topic your section set, how many sources it requires and the rubric. Weighed entries in the required count arrive within 24 to 48 hours, with no fee on a first list. The sources named in the example are illustrative, and yours would be chosen for your own question.
INHE 1003 Week 9 questions, answered
Why include a source that was rejected?
Many prompts for this week ask you to weigh sources, and a rejection is the clearest evidence that weighing happened. The example keeps one, a news feature, and states the reason in a sentence. If your rubric counts only accepted sources toward the required number, the rejected entry is extra rather than a substitute, and it can sit at the end of the list.
How long should each annotation be?
Whatever your section specifies, and around eighty words when it does not. That length fits the three parts, what the source is, what it states and what it can support, with a sentence on its limits. Annotations under forty words rarely manage the evaluation, and those running past a hundred and fifty tend to drift back into summary.
Can a government web page count as a scholarly source?
For context, often yes; as evidence about a psychological theory, rarely. The example uses an agency page to describe how first-year drinking is framed nationally and does not cite it as support for the norms approach itself. Your section's rubric may define scholarly narrowly, and where it does, the page moves to background or off the list entirely.