| Course | HLTH 6031 Leadership and Advocacy in Health Education |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 8 |
| Paper type | Testimony draft |
| Length | About 700 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | MS in Health Education and Promotion |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 6031 Week 8
Three Minutes Before the Transit Board: Testimony Asking That Route 22's Extension Be Studied in the 2027 Plan, With One Rider's Story, One Federal Figure and Notes on Every Cut
Student Name
Walden University
HLTH 6031: Leadership and Advocacy in Health Education
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Three Minutes Before the Transit Board: Testimony Asking That Route 22's Extension Be Studied in the 2027 Plan, With One Rider's Story, One Federal Figure and Notes on Every Cut
The Testimony
Read aloud at the public comment period of the Harbor County Transit District board meeting, December 10, 2026. Time limit: three minutes.
Good evening, Chair Osei and members of the board. My name is Jordan Avery. I lead health education at Eastgate Community Health Center. I am here to ask you to have staff study carrying Route 22 into our corridor as part of next year's service plan.
Our corridor has four places people need to reach: our health center, the Eastgate dialysis unit, the county WIC office and the senior center. None of them has a bus stop. The nearest Route 22 stop is a mile and a half away, on a road with no sidewalk.
Let me tell you about one of our patients. I will call him Mr. L. He is 67 and on dialysis three times a week. He used to ride Route 22 and walk the rest of the way. Last winter he slipped on the shoulder of Eastgate Road and broke his wrist. Now he depends on a neighbor for every treatment. When the neighbor cannot drive him, he misses dialysis.
Mr. L. is not unusual. Last year our front desk counted 312 appointments missed because patients had no ride. And this is a national problem. A federal health survey found that 5.8 million Americans put off care in 2017 because they had no ride.
We are not asking you to approve the extension tonight. We are asking that staff include it in the February draft, so you can weigh its ridership and cost next spring with the rest of the plan. By January 15 we will hand staff our missed-visit counts and a rider survey.
Please direct staff to study the Route 22 extension. Thank you.
Notes on the Draft
Length and Pace
The testimony runs to about 270 words. Read at a measured pace with pauses, it fits within three minutes with time to spare, so the chair does not need to cut in. Sentences are short enough to say without a breath in the middle.
The Opening
The opening gives name, role and position in that order. The public record needs all three, and if the chair interrupts later, the ask has already been made.
The Story
One story carries the human weight. Mr. L. is a composite of patients described by the dialysis unit's social worker; his name is withheld and his details are general enough not to identify anyone. The story runs five sentences and ends on the consequence, a missed treatment, rather than on a feeling. Narratives can increase comprehension and engagement among nonexpert audiences and are persuasive in themselves, which also raises an ethical duty to keep them accurate (Dahlstrom, 2014). A board member hearing one rider's fall on an unsafe road will remember it longer than a table.
The Figure
One national statistic appears, attributed aloud to the federal survey behind it, because a spoken number without a source invites a question the speaker may not have time to answer. The figure comes from an analysis of National Health Interview Survey data by Wolfe et al. (2020). The local count of 312 missed appointments is the clinic's own and is identified as such.
What Was Cut
An earlier draft included the cost estimate for the extension, the review of 61 studies on transportation barriers and a comparison with a microtransit option. All three were cut. The cost and options belong in the policy brief that board staff will read; spoken aloud, they would crowd out the story and the ask. Brownson et al. (2006) note that information overload is one of the reasons research fails to reach policymakers, and three minutes of testimony is the least forgiving place to overload a listener.
The Close
The testimony closes by repeating the ask in nearly the same words it opened with, and by offering a concrete next step with a date. A board member who heard only the last line would still know what was requested.
References
Brownson, R. C., Royer, C., Ewing, R., & McBride, T. D. (2006). Researchers and policymakers: Travelers in parallel universes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.004
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Suppl. 4), 13614-13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
Wolfe, M. K., McDonald, N. C., & Holmes, G. M. (2020). Transportation barriers to health care in the United States: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey, 1997-2017. American Journal of Public Health, 110(6), 815-822. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305579
What the HLTH 6031 Week 8 instructions ask for
Week 8 asks students to write public testimony that fits a timed speaking slot, usually two to three minutes. The prompt expects remarks written to be heard once: short sentences, the speaker's name and role and the position stated at the start, and the ask repeated at the end. Most instructors require one story and one statistic, each chosen carefully, with the statistic attributed aloud to its source. The draft should stop before the chair would need to interrupt. Many prompts also ask for notes explaining choices, such as what was cut and why. Anything spoken about a person must protect privacy. The testimony should build on the campaign's earlier documents but not try to include them all. Sources in the notes can support the storytelling and evidence choices. A written essay read aloud, with long sentences and several statistics, does not meet the assignment.
How the HLTH 6031 Week 8 example is put together
The testimony addresses the chair and members, then gives name, role and ask in three sentences. A short passage describes the four corridor services and the gap to the nearest stop. The story of Mr. L., kept general to protect privacy, runs five sentences from his routine to his fall to his missed treatments. The next passage gives the clinic's count of missed appointments and the national survey figure, named aloud. The speaker then clarifies that the board is asked only to study the extension, offers data by a date and repeats the ask. Notes follow: word count and pace, why name, role and position come first, why one composite story and how narrative research supports it, why one attributed figure, what was cut from an earlier draft and why, and how the close works if a listener hears only the last line.
Where the marks sit in the HLTH 6031 Week 8 rubric
Testimony drafts are commonly graded on timing, structure, the story, the statistic and the notes. Timing is checked by word count or a read-through; drafts that would run over the limit lose credit. The opening should state name, role and position. The story earns credit when it is brief, concrete and ethically handled, ending on a consequence rather than a feeling. The statistic should be accurate and attributed aloud. The close should repeat the ask. Notes are judged on whether they explain choices with reasons and evidence, including what was cut. Audibility, short sentences and plain words, matters throughout. Mechanics include APA entries for a PNAS article with a supplement issue and two journal articles.
HLTH 6031 Week 8 help from the desk
Testimony drafts often fail because they read like papers: long sentences, several statistics and a conclusion that summarizes instead of asking. Another frequent problem is a story told at length that leaves no time for the ask. Students also cite numbers without saying where they came from. Before submitting, read your draft aloud with a timer and cut anything over the limit. Put your name, role and ask in the first three sentences. Keep one story to five sentences and end it on what happened. Use one statistic and name its source in the sentence. Repeat the ask in your last line. Remove identifying details from any story. A custom draft can be written for a different hearing, such as a city council budget session or a state legislative committee.
Get a HLTH 6031 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Send the Week 8 prompt, your section's rubric and the time limit it sets, and the testimony written for you fits the clock, with the ask at both ends and the figure attributed aloud. The first custom sample is free, back inside 24 to 48 hours. Stories from your practice belong to the people in them.
More HLTH 6031 papers and MS in Health Education and Promotion samples
- HLTH 6031 Week 1: Leadership Analysis Paper
- HLTH 6031 Week 2: Failed Advocacy Discussion Post
- HLTH 6031 Week 3: Advocacy Issue Brief
- HLTH 6031 Week 4: Stakeholder Analysis Paper
- HLTH 6031 Week 5: Advocacy Letter Example
- HLTH 6031 Week 6: Authority Check Peer Reply
- HLTH 6031 Week 7: Policy Brief Example
- HLTH 6031 Week 9: Coalition Plan Paper
- HLTH 6031 Week 10: Advocacy Campaign Plan
- HLTH 6031 Week 11: Advocacy Leadership Statement
- HLTH 6005 Week 8: Practice Settings Analysis
HLTH 6031 Week 8 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HLTH 6031 Week 8 sample paper?
A complete Week 8 three-minute testimony to a transit board, with notes explaining every choice and three references, can be read here in full with margin notes.
How long is the testimony in the HLTH 6031 Week 8 example?
About 270 words, which fits within a three-minute public comment period at a measured pace with pauses.
Why use only one story and one statistic?
Listeners hear testimony once, so one concrete story and one attributed figure are remembered, while several numbers crowd out the ask.
How does the testimony protect the patient's privacy?
The story is a composite of patients described by a social worker, with the name withheld and details kept general enough not to identify anyone.
What was cut from the testimony?
The cost estimate, the review of 61 studies and the microtransit comparison, which belong in the written brief rather than in three minutes of spoken remarks.