| Course | HLTH 4320 Nutrition Across the Lifespan |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 9 |
| Paper type | Life stage brief |
| Length | About 820 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Public Health |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 4320 Week 9
Nutrition After 70: Protein, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D, What the Reference Values Say, What Expert Groups Add and Where the Evidence Stops
Student Name
Walden University
HLTH 4320: Nutrition Across the Lifespan
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Nutrition After 70: Protein, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D, What the Reference Values Say, What Expert Groups Add and Where the Evidence Stops
Summary
The Dietary Reference Intakes treat everyone 71 and older as one group, though a healthy 72-year-old and a frail 90-year-old differ in muscle mass, absorption and illness. For three nutrients of particular concern in later life, this brief sets out the reference values, what expert groups recommend beyond them and the evidence behind each. Protein needs may be higher than the reference value suggests, vitamin B12 absorption from food often declines and vitamin D values were raised for the oldest group, though a large trial found that extra vitamin D did not prevent fractures in healthy older adults. A final section states where the evidence stops.
Protein
For all adults, those over 70 included, the protein RDA is 0.8 g for each kilogram of body weight daily (Institute of Medicine, 2005). An international expert group, PROT-AGE, reviewed protein needs with aging and recommended an average of at least 1.0 to 1.2 g per kilogram daily for people over 65 to maintain and regain lean body mass and function, more for active older adults and 1.2 to 1.5 g for most older adults with acute or chronic disease, with an exception for those with severe kidney disease not on dialysis (Bauer et al., 2013).
The two figures do not strictly conflict. The RDA is set to prevent deficiency in healthy people, while PROT-AGE aimed at preserving muscle and function. But they lead to different advice: a 70-kilogram older adult would need 56 grams a day by the RDA and 70 to 84 grams by PROT-AGE. The group itself noted that evidence was not yet sufficient for recommendations on protein quality or timing.
Vitamin B12
The RDA for vitamin B12 is 2.4 micrograms a day for adults of all ages (Institute of Medicine, 2006). What changes with age is absorption. In large American and British surveys, about 6% of people aged 60 and older were deficient in vitamin B12, and closer to 20% had marginal status, with deficiency becoming more common with age (Allen, 2009). In older people, the main cause is malabsorption of the vitamin bound to food, partly due to gastric atrophy, rather than low intake. Most older adults can still absorb the crystalline form used in fortified foods and supplements, which is why reference guidance advises adults over 50 to obtain much of their B12 from those sources (Institute of Medicine, 2006).
Vitamin D
The RDA for vitamin D is 800 IU a day for adults 71 and older, higher than the 600 IU for younger adults, set for bone health assuming little sunlight (Ross et al., 2011). Older adults make less vitamin D in their skin and often spend less time outdoors.
Whether more is better is a different question. The VITAL trial gave 25,871 generally healthy midlife and older adults (men from 50, women from 55) either a daily 2,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 or a placebo. Over about five years, the supplement did not reduce total, nonvertebral or hip fractures (LeBoff et al., 2022). The participants were not selected for low vitamin D levels or for osteoporosis, so the result speaks to supplementation of the general older population, not to treatment of deficiency.
Where the Evidence Stops
The evidence for older adults has gaps that a brief should state rather than fill.
The reference values group everyone 71 and older together. There are no separate values for the very old, though people in their late 80s and 90s differ substantially from those in their early 70s.
Trials often underrepresent the oldest and frailest adults. The vitamin D fracture trial enrolled generally healthy adults living in the community; it cannot tell us whether supplementation helps nursing home residents or people with very low vitamin D levels.
For protein, the higher recommendations rest largely on studies of muscle and function over months, not on long-term trials showing fewer disabilities or deaths. PROT-AGE called for future studies that measure physical function directly (Bauer et al., 2013).
For vitamin B12, the benefit of correcting marginal status, as opposed to clear deficiency, is uncertain; Allen (2009) noted that intervention studies were still needed to assess functional benefits.
Older adults also take more medications, some of which affect nutrient absorption, and have more chronic diseases, but reference values are set for healthy people. Much of what matters most for an individual older adult therefore falls outside the reference tables.
Implications
For practitioners writing for older adults, three points follow. Protein advice should state which standard is being used, the RDA or a function-based recommendation. Vitamin B12 advice should focus on fortified foods or supplements rather than total food intake. And vitamin D advice should distinguish meeting the 800 IU RDA from taking higher doses in the hope of preventing fractures, which a large trial did not support for healthy older adults.
References
Allen, L. H. (2009). How common is vitamin B-12 deficiency? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(2), 693S-696S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2008.26947A
Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Morley, J. E., Phillips, S., Sieber, C., Stehle, P., Teta, D., Visvanathan, R., Volpi, E., & Boirie, Y. (2013). Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: A position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(8), 542-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021
Institute of Medicine. (2005). Dietary Reference Intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10490
Institute of Medicine. (2006). Dietary Reference Intakes: The essential guide to nutrient requirements (J. J. Otten, J. P. Hellwig, & L. D. Meyers, Eds.). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11537
LeBoff, M. S., Chou, S. H., Ratliff, K. A., Cook, N. R., Khurana, B., Kim, E., Cawthon, P. M., Bauer, D. C., Black, D., Gallagher, J. C., Lee, I.-M., Buring, J. E., & Manson, J. E. (2022). Supplemental vitamin D and incident fractures in midlife and older adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 387(4), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2202106
Ross, A. C., Manson, J. E., Abrams, S. A., Aloia, J. F., Brannon, P. M., Clinton, S. K., Durazo-Arvizu, R. A., Gallagher, J. C., Gallo, R. L., Jones, G., Kovacs, C. S., Mayne, S. T., Rosen, C. J., & Shapses, S. A. (2011). The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: What clinicians need to know. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 96(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2704
Reading the HLTH 4320 Week 9 instructions
The second life stage brief turns to older adults and asks for the same discipline as Week 3, with one addition: honesty about weak evidence. Choose two to four nutrients of concern after age 70 and give the reference value for each. Where expert groups recommend something different from the reference intake, report both and explain the difference in purpose. Describe what changes with age, such as absorption or skin synthesis, with sources. Then write a section on what the evidence does not show, because trials often leave out the oldest and frailest adults. Close with implications for practitioners writing for this group. Keep the brief to about three pages, with headings and APA citations. Avoid treating the 71-and-older group as if it described every older person equally well.
How the HLTH 4320 Week 9 example is put together
A summary explains that the reference intakes treat everyone 71 and older as one group and names the three nutrients. The protein section sets the 0.8 g/kg allowance against the PROT-AGE recommendation and works the difference for a 70-kilogram adult. The B12 section explains that the allowance is unchanged while absorption from food falls, citing survey prevalence from Allen. The vitamin D section gives the 800 IU allowance and the reasons older adults make less vitamin D, then reports VITAL's fracture result. Where the Evidence Stops is the longest section, with five short paragraphs on the single age group, underrepresented frail adults, protein outcomes measured over months, uncertain benefit for marginal B12 status and medication effects. Implications give three points for practitioners: name the protein standard, favor fortified foods for B12 and avoid high-dose vitamin D for healthy adults.
HLTH 4320 Week 9 rubric: what earns full marks
Faculty look first at accurate values and correct attribution, especially when a reference intake and an expert-group recommendation are both reported. A brief that presents PROT-AGE's figure as the official allowance loses credit for accuracy. Explanation of age-related change, such as reduced B12 absorption, counts under content depth. The evidence-limits section often carries its own rubric line, and it rates highest when it names specific gaps rather than saying more research is needed. Sources should include the National Academies reports and peer-reviewed reviews or trials. Implications should follow from the evidence presented. Concise writing and clear headings are graded under organization, and APA format applies to the six references, including the group-authored reports.
HLTH 4320 Week 9 help from the desk
The most common slip is writing past the evidence, for example advising high-dose vitamin D for all older adults when the fracture trial found no benefit in healthy community dwellers. Another is presenting the PROT-AGE range as if it replaced the RDA. Explain that the two serve different purposes. Students also forget that B12 needs rarely change; absorption from food is what declines, which is why fortified foods and supplements matter. Avoid generalizing from studies of healthy volunteers to nursing home residents. Write the limits section with specific gaps, each tied to a source. If your prompt names a condition such as sarcopenia or chronic kidney disease, the brief will need clinical sources beyond the reference tables. A custom version around that condition can be requested.
Get a HLTH 4320 Week 9 example written to your instructions
Attach the prompt and the rubric, and a sample brief on the same stage returns inside 24-48h, first custom sample free. Nothing is recycled from another student's file, and nothing here is written to be handed in as it stands; the graded document is the one you write yourself.
More HLTH 4320 papers and BS in Public Health samples
- HLTH 4320 Week 1: Dietary Reference Intakes Post
- HLTH 4320 Week 2: Vitamin D Guideline Read
- HLTH 4320 Week 3: Pregnancy and Infancy Brief
- HLTH 4320 Week 4: Childhood Requirements Table
- HLTH 4320 Week 5: Sugary Drinks Evidence Appraisal
- HLTH 4320 Week 6: Nutrition Label Analysis
- HLTH 4320 Week 7: Breakfast Claim Discussion Post
- HLTH 4320 Week 8: Adult Fiber Population Brief
- HLTH 4320 Week 10: Infant Iron Education Handout
- HLTH 4320 Week 11: Iron Across the Lifespan Paper
- HLTH 4300 Week 9: Tracking Summary
- HLTH 4200 Week 9: Outbreak Narrative
- HLTH 3115 Week 9: Intervention Proposal
- HLTH 2500 Week 9: Measurement Plan
HLTH 4320 Week 9 questions, answered
Where can I find a free HLTH 4320 Week 9 sample paper?
This page presents the full Week 9 brief on protein, vitamin B12 and vitamin D after age 70, with an evidence-limits section and six APA references, available to read freely.
What protein recommendation does the HLTH 4320 Week 9 brief give?
It reports both the 0.8 g/kg RDA and the PROT-AGE recommendation of 1.0 to 1.2 g/kg, and explains that the second aims at preserving muscle and function rather than preventing deficiency.
Does vitamin B12 need increase with age?
The allowance stays at 2.4 micrograms a day, but absorption of B12 from food often declines, so the brief points older adults toward fortified foods or supplements.
Should older adults take high-dose vitamin D?
The brief reports that 2,000 IU a day did not reduce fractures in generally healthy adults in VITAL, so it does not recommend high doses for that group.
Why does the brief have a section on where the evidence stops?
Reference values group everyone 71 and older together, and trials often leave out the frailest adults, so the brief names those gaps instead of writing past them.