| Course | FNCE 4103 International Finance |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 3 |
| Paper type | Parity brief |
| Length | About 780 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | BS in Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for FNCE 4103 Week 3
Does Covered Interest Rate Parity Hold for Lakeland's 90-Day Euro Payable? Two Interest Rates, the Implied Forward Rate, the Quoted Forward and What a Gap of a Few Hundredths of a Percent Means
Student Name
Walden University
FNCE 4103: International Finance
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Does Covered Interest Rate Parity Hold for Lakeland's 90-Day Euro Payable? Two Interest Rates, the Implied Forward Rate, the Quoted Forward and What a Gap of a Few Hundredths of a Percent Means
The Relationship
Under covered interest rate parity, the gap between a forward rate and today's spot rate mirrors the gap between the two currencies' interest rates for the same term. In symbols, F = S x (1 + i_US x t) / (1 + i_EUR x t), where F is the forward rate in dollars per euro, S is the spot rate, i_US and i_EUR are annual interest rates on comparable dollar and euro deposits and t is the fraction of a year, here 90 / 360 (Madura, 2021). Were it to fail, a trader could fund a position in dollars, switch into euros, earn euro interest and sell the proceeds forward, pocketing a gain with no currency risk.
The Data
The inputs are illustrative but consistent with conditions when U.S. short-term rates were well above euro-area rates:
The comparison only works if the two rates are for the same maturity and comparable credit quality. Comparing a 3-month dollar rate with a 1-year euro rate, or a government rate with a bank deposit rate, would produce a meaningless gap.
Table 1
Inputs for the 90-Day Parity Calculation
| Input | Value | Note | |
|---|---|---|
| Spot rate, S | $1.0850 per euro | Midmarket, the same quote used in Week 2 | |
| 90-day dollar interest rate, i_US | 5.00% a year | Comparable to a 3-month dollar deposit rate | |
| 90-day euro interest rate, i_EUR | 3.60% a year | Comparable to a 3-month euro deposit rate | |
| Quoted 90-day forward rate | $1.0890 per euro | Illustrative bank quote, same day | |
Illustrative figures for the case; both rates are for the same 90-day maturity, which the comparison requires.
The Implied Forward Rate
F = 1.0850 x (1 + 0.0500 x 0.25) / (1 + 0.0360 x 0.25)
F = 1.0850 x 1.012500 / 1.009000
F = 1.0850 x 1.003469
F = $1.0888 per euro
With dollar interest above euro interest, the euro sells forward at a premium: the forward rate is above the spot rate by about 0.35 percent for 90 days. Parity says the higher interest an investor earns on dollars is offset by paying more, in dollars, for euros delivered later.
Why Parity Should Hold
The logic is an arbitrage argument. Suppose the forward rate were well above $1.0888, say $1.0950. A trader could borrow dollars at 5 percent, buy euros at $1.0850, invest them at 3.6 percent and sell the euros forward at $1.0950. At the end of 90 days the trader would receive more dollars from the forward sale than needed to repay the dollar loan, with no exposure to the exchange rate, because every rate was fixed at the start. Traders doing this at scale would push the spot rate up, the forward rate down and the interest rates toward each other until the profit disappeared. Levich (2001) describes covered parity as one of the most reliable relationships in international finance precisely because the trades that enforce it carry no currency risk.
The Quoted Rate Beside It
The bank's quoted forward is $1.0890, against the implied $1.0888. The difference is $0.0002 per euro, or about 0.02 percent. On Lakeland's €2,000,000 payable, that is about $400.
What the Gap Means
A gap this small does not signal an arbitrage opportunity. Bid-ask spreads on the spot and forward rates, on the deposit rates and on the transactions needed to exploit the gap would each cost more than 0.02 percent, so no trader could profit from it. For practical purposes, covered interest rate parity holds here. Research has found, however, that since 2008 small but persistent deviations from covered parity have appeared in major currency pairs, especially at quarter ends, because regulation has made it more costly for banks to use their balance sheets for arbitrage (Du et al., 2018). The deviation in this example is within the range those studies report for the euro.
What It Means for Lakeland
For Lakeland's treasurer, the result has a simple meaning. A forward contract at $1.0890 locks in a dollar cost of $2,178,000 for the €2,000,000 payable, about $8,000 more than paying at today's spot rate. That $8,000 is not a fee or a forecast of the euro rising; it reflects the interest rate difference. Lakeland could obtain essentially the same result by borrowing dollars today, buying euros at spot and investing them in a euro deposit for 90 days, a money market hedge, because parity links the two. The choice between those methods, and whether to hedge at all, is the subject of later weeks.
References
Du, W., Tepper, A., & Verdelhan, A. (2018). Deviations from covered interest rate parity. The Journal of Finance, 73(3), 915-957. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12620
Levich, R. M. (2001). International financial markets: Prices and policies (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Madura, J. (2021). International financial management (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
The Walden FNCE 4103 Week 3 instructions
In Week 3 you test one parity relationship with real or realistic data. Name the relationship and state it once as a formula, with every term defined in words. Present your data, two interest rates for the same maturity or two prices for a comparable good, each with its source and date, and explain why matching maturities or goods matters. Compute the implied rate with the substitution shown. Set the quoted rate beside it and state the difference as a percentage and, if useful, in money. Explain whether the gap could be exploited, and close with what the result means for a firm's decision.
How this FNCE 4103 Week 3 example is built
The brief states the covered parity formula and the logic of riskless arbitrage, citing Madura. A four-row table gives spot, both interest rates and the quoted forward, with a note on matching maturities. The calculation section substitutes the numbers line by line to reach $1.0888 and explains the forward premium. An arbitrage section shows how traders would close a gap, citing Levich. The comparison finds a difference of $0.0002 per euro, about $400 on the payable. The interpretation explains why spreads make that gap unexploitable and cites Du and colleagues on small, persistent deviations since 2008. The final section explains the $8,000 cost of hedging as an interest difference, not a fee.
Reading the FNCE 4103 Week 3 rubric
Parity briefs are graded on correct statement, matched data and careful comparison. The formula must be stated accurately with its terms defined. Data must be comparable, with the same maturity and similar credit quality, and sourced. The calculation should show each substitution so it can be checked. Strong briefs interpret the size of any gap realistically, considering transaction costs, rather than declaring parity violated by a tiny difference. Connecting the result to a firm's hedging decision shows practical understanding. Briefs that mix maturities, skip the arithmetic or treat the forward rate as a forecast without explanation lose credit. The best briefs also say what the result does not show: covered parity concerns the forward rate today, not where the spot rate will be in 90 days, and confusing the two leads to bad hedging decisions.
FNCE 4103 Week 3 help from the desk
Choose the relationship your prompt names and write it out in words first: the forward premium should equal the interest rate difference, for example. Find two interest rates for exactly the same period, one in each currency, and note the source and date. Plug them into the formula one step at a time. Then look up or use the quoted forward and compare. If the difference is tiny, ask what it would cost to trade on it. Common errors are using annual rates without adjusting for the period, mixing maturities and calling any gap an arbitrage. Share your data with us and we can check the calculation step by step.
Get a FNCE 4103 Week 3 example written to your instructions
Whichever price or interest data your section handed out belongs with the Week 3 prompt and rubric, along with the country pair. The implied rate in the sample is computed on that data, and the gap is read against conditions in those two countries. First sample free, back within 24 to 48 hours.
More FNCE 4103 papers and BS in Business Administration samples
- FNCE 4103 Week 1: International Finance Post
- FNCE 4103 Week 2: Exchange Rate Quotation Note
- FNCE 4103 Week 4: Exchange Rate Forecast Critique
- FNCE 4103 Week 5: Transaction Exposure Memo
- FNCE 4103 Week 6: Translation Exposure Note
- FNCE 4103 Week 7: Operating Exposure Analysis
- FNCE 4103 Week 8: Currency Hedging Comparison
- FNCE 4103 Week 9: Cross-Border Capital Budgeting
- FNCE 4103 Week 10: Country Risk Assessment Brief
- FNCE 4103 Week 11: International Finance Case Paper
- HRMG 3001 Week 3: Critical Incident Job Analysis
- FNCE 4102 Week 3: Monetary Policy Transmission Brief
- FNCE 4101 Week 3: Present Value Discounting Exercise
- FNCE 3001 Week 3: Financial Ratio Analysis
FNCE 4103 Week 3 questions, answered
Where can I find a free FNCE 4103 Week 3 sample paper?
The parity brief, inputs table and calculation appear on this page, free to read.
What does the FNCE 4103 Week 3 brief test?
Whether covered interest rate parity holds for a 90-day euro forward, using 5.0 percent dollar and 3.6 percent euro rates.
What forward rate does parity imply?
$1.0888 per euro, against a quoted forward of $1.0890.
Is the gap an arbitrage opportunity?
No. The difference of about 0.02 percent is smaller than the trading costs needed to exploit it.
What does the result mean for the company?
A forward hedge costs about $8,000 more than today's spot because of the interest rate difference, not because of a fee.