ECON 1002 Week 1 Opportunity Cost Discussion Post Example

Microeconomics Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This ECON 1002 Week 1 discussion post example prices the real opportunity cost of one ordinary purchase: a $300 refurbished commuter bicycle bought instead of twelve monthly bus passes that cost about the same. Walden ECON 1002, Microeconomics, opens with this thread because a price tag rarely shows what a choice gives up, so the post states the choice, defines opportunity cost and then lists what the passes carried besides rides, about 150 hours of reading time, dry winter arrivals and no repair bills. It names a lock bought the year before as a sunk cost that should not have mattered and admits it did. The assumption beneath the decision closes the post, followed by a question for classmates. Replies to Janelle and Marcus add a retake risk and forgone interest. OpenStax and Mankiw are cited, at the level of a first BS in Business Administration economics course.

CourseECON 1002 Microeconomics
WeekWeek 1
Paper typeDiscussion post
LengthAbout 550 words, 3 pages
FormatDiscussion post, APA 7 citations
SchoolWalden University
ProgramBS in Business Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for ECON 1002 Week 1

1

Week 1 Discussion: Opportunity Cost in a Choice of Your Own

A $300 Refurbished Bicycle or Twelve Monthly Bus Passes: Pricing What the Bicycle Pushed Aside, Including Reading Time, Dry Winter Mornings and a Lock That Should Not Have Counted

Last August I spent about $300 on a refurbished commuter bicycle instead of renewing twelve monthly bus passes, which would have cost roughly the same. At the register the two options looked equal. They were not.

Opportunity cost is the value of the next-best alternative given up when a choice is made (Greenlaw et al., 2022). My next-best alternative was the bus, so the cost of the bicycle is everything the passes would have given me. Some of it has no price. On the bus I read for about forty minutes a day, which over a year is roughly 150 hours of reading I traded for riding. In January and February I arrived at work dry and warm; on the bicycle I arrived wet on at least a dozen mornings and once skipped a shift meeting to change clothes. The passes also came with no repair bills, while the bicycle has needed two tubes and a chain, about $45 so far. Shoppers often fail to think about opportunity cost unless it is pointed out to them (Frederick et al., 2009), and I was no exception. I also have to admit that a $40 lock I had bought the year before nudged me toward the bicycle. That money was already spent and gone whichever way I chose, so it was a sunk cost and should not have counted, but it did; Arkes and Blumer (1985) found that people regularly let past spending steer new choices.

My decision still rests on one assumption: that an hour of cycling, with the exercise and the freedom to leave when I like, is worth more to me than an hour of reading on the bus. If that is wrong, the bicycle cost me more than the passes would have, even though the receipts say they were the same. Mankiw (2021) puts it simply: the cost of something is what you give up to get it, and the receipts only tell part of that story.

What purchase of yours looked like a fair trade at the price but hid a cost you only noticed later?

What this page is doingThe last paragraph names the assumption that a classmate can most usefully challenge.
2

Reply to Janelle

Janelle, your choice to take a weekend catering job instead of studying for your accounting exam is a clear opportunity cost example, and you priced the lost study time well. One more cost may be worth adding: if the lower grade means retaking the course, the opportunity cost includes the tuition and the time of a second attempt, which could exceed the $220 you earned. Did you think about that risk when you said yes to the shift?

What this page is doingEach reply asks for one missing piece of the classmate's opportunity cost rather than praising the post.
3

Reply to Marcus

Marcus, you said buying a used car for $6,000 had no opportunity cost because you paid cash from savings. I would push back gently. The savings could have earned interest or covered the emergency fund you mentioned wanting, so the forgone interest and the security of that cushion are both part of the cost. Greenlaw et al. (2022) note that money already in hand still has alternative uses, which is exactly why paying cash is not free. What would you have done with the $6,000 otherwise?

References

Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4

Frederick, S., Novemsky, N., Wang, J., Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. (2009). Opportunity cost neglect. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 553-561. https://doi.org/10.1086/599764

Greenlaw, S. A., Shapiro, D., & MacDonald, D. (2022). Principles of microeconomics (3rd ed.). OpenStax. https://openstax.org/details/books/principles-microeconomics-3e

Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of microeconomics (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Reading the ECON 1002 Week 1 instructions

In Week 1 you describe one choice you made with your own money or time and identify its opportunity cost. State the choice and the alternative you gave up. Define opportunity cost in a sentence, then apply it: list everything the next-best option would have given you, including benefits with no price, such as time, comfort or convenience. If a sunk cost influenced the decision, say so and explain why it should not have. Name the assumption your choice depends on, the one a classmate could dispute. Close with a question about classmates' own choices. In replies, point out a cost the classmate may have missed.

Inside the ECON 1002 Week 1 example

The post opens with the choice between the bicycle and the bus passes and notes that the two cost the same at the register. Paragraph two defines opportunity cost, citing OpenStax, and lists what the passes offered: forty minutes of reading a day, about a dozen dry arrivals in winter and no repairs, against the $45 spent on tubes and a chain. The same paragraph names the $40 lock as a sunk cost. The final paragraph states the assumption that an hour of cycling is worth more than an hour of reading, citing Mankiw, and asks classmates what purchase hid a cost. Janelle's reply adds the cost of a retake; Marcus's adds forgone interest on savings.

Where the marks sit in the ECON 1002 Week 1 rubric

Week 1 posts are graded on applying opportunity cost to a real choice rather than defining it. The strongest posts name a specific next-best alternative and list its benefits in detail, especially benefits with no price. Recognizing a sunk cost, and explaining why it should not count, shows the concept is understood. Posts that equate opportunity cost with the money spent, or list generic alternatives, earn less. Stating the assumption behind the choice demonstrates economic reasoning at an early stage. A reply earns its marks by adding a cost the classmate overlooked, not by agreeing. Citing the course text for the definition is expected. Posts should stay close to three hundred words; length is not rewarded, while a sharp, specific list of what was given up is.

ECON 1002 Week 1 help from the desk

Think of a choice you made recently where two options cost about the same. Write down the one you rejected and everything it would have given you, not just money: time, comfort, risk, flexibility. That list is the opportunity cost. Then ask whether anything you had already paid for, and could not get back, pushed you one way; that is a sunk cost, and it should not have. A common mistake is to treat the price as the whole cost, or to list every possible alternative rather than the next-best one. Tell us about a choice you made, and we can help shape it into a post that applies the idea well.

Get a ECON 1002 Week 1 example written to your instructions

Send the week's prompt and rubric along with the trade-off you have in mind, even in a sentence, and the post is drafted around that choice, first one free within 24 to 48 hours. The bicycle, the bus passes and the $300 are a composite sketch; nobody's actual budget sits behind them.

More ECON 1002 papers and BS in Business Administration samples

ECON 1002 Week 1 questions, answered

Where can I find a free ECON 1002 Week 1 sample paper?

Yes. Every word of the bicycle post, with the replies to Janelle and Marcus, is shown on this page free.

What choice does the ECON 1002 Week 1 post analyze?

Buying a $300 refurbished commuter bicycle instead of twelve monthly bus passes that would have cost about the same.

What hidden costs does the post find?

About 150 hours of reading time a year, roughly a dozen wet winter arrivals and $45 in repairs that the passes would have avoided.

Why is the lock a sunk cost?

It was bought the year before and could not be recovered whichever way the author chose, so it should not have influenced the decision.

What do the replies add?

For Janelle, the cost of retaking a course after a poor exam; for Marcus, the interest and security his savings would have provided.