| Course | DDHA 9901 Practice-Based Problem Identification |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 6 |
| Paper type | Cost estimate |
| Length | About 1,020 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Healthcare Administration (DHA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DDHA 9901 Week 6
What the Late Discharge Summary Costs Each Year as Things Stand: A Traceable Estimate Built Link by Link, Reported as a Range, With the Unpriced Costs Kept Separate
Student Name
Walden University
DDHA 9901: Practice-Based Problem Identification
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
What the Late Discharge Summary Costs Each Year as Things Stand: A Traceable Estimate Built Link by Link, Reported as a Range, With the Unpriced Costs Kept Separate
What Is Being Priced
This estimate puts a figure on the discharge summary transmission problem at Larchmont Health, a composite two-hospital system, as it currently runs. It prices no solution. Every link in the chain is shown, each unit cost is attributed in the sentence that uses it, and frequencies come from the evidence gathered earlier in the course rather than from recollection. Because the inputs are uncertain, the result is a range.
Frequency
The chain starts with how often the problem occurs. Larchmont discharges about 8,600 adult medical patients home each year, from the record system's discharge counts. About 55% of them are followed by a practice that does not use Larchmont's record, roughly 4,730 discharges. In the months when both transmission logs were available, the summary reached the practice within two business days for 52% of those discharges, so about 48%, roughly 2,270 discharges a year, are not transmitted in time. A further group, about 520 a year, have no primary care clinician recorded, so their summaries go nowhere; they are counted separately below.
Unit Costs
Labor costs use national wage data. The median hourly wage for medical secretaries and administrative assistants was $22.08 in the most recent national estimates, for physician assistants $65.33 and for the category of physicians that includes hospitalists $127.85 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2026). These are wages, not fully loaded costs, so they understate the true cost of staff time; the estimate uses them as the lower bound and adds 30% for benefits as the upper bound.
Category 1: Practice Staff Chasing Missing Summaries
When a summary has not arrived, practice staff often call or fax the hospital to request it. The share of late summaries that trigger a request is an assumption, set at 50% to 70%, because practices were not surveyed; the physician liaison's account of repeated complaints supports a figure in that range. Each request takes an assumed 15 to 25 minutes of a medical secretary's time, including waiting on hold and filing what arrives. Combining these with the wage, loaded at the upper bound, gives about $6,300 to $19,000 a year. This cost falls on the practices, not on Larchmont, but it is a real cost of the problem as it runs.
Category 2: Hospital Staff Answering Requests
Each request has to be answered at the hospital, usually by health information management staff or unit clerks who locate and resend the summary. At an assumed 8 to 12 minutes per request and the same wage, this comes to about $3,300 to $9,100 a year, falling on Larchmont.
Category 3: Clinician Time at the Follow-Up Visit
When a summary is missing at the visit, the clinician spends time reconstructing what happened from the patient, the pharmacy and calls to the hospital. The matched data suggest that about 60% of patients whose summaries were late had a follow-up visit within 14 days, about 1,360 visits a year. Assuming 8 to 15 additional minutes per visit, valued at the physician assistant wage at the low end and the loaded physician wage at the high end, gives about $11,900 to $56,600 a year, depending on who sees the patient and how long the reconstruction takes. This is the largest priced category and the most uncertain.
Category 4: Discharges With No Clinician Recorded
For the roughly 520 discharges a year with no primary care clinician recorded, the summary is never sent. Some of these patients have no clinician; others have one whom registration failed to record. Their follow-up costs are not priced here because the share who have a clinician is unknown, but the category is kept separate so it is not lost.
The Assumption Block
Table 1
Assumptions Behind the Estimate
| Input | Low | High | Source or basis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adult medical discharges home per year | 8,600 | 8,600 | Record system counts | |
| Share with outside primary care clinician | 55% | 55% | Registration data | |
| Share not transmitted within two days | 48% | 48% | Matched transmission logs, June to August | |
| Late summaries triggering a request | 50% | 70% | Assumption, supported by liaison reports | |
| Practice staff minutes per request | 15 | 25 | Assumption | |
| Hospital staff minutes per request | 8 | 12 | Assumption | |
| Late summaries followed by a visit within 14 days | 60% | 60% | Matched claims data | |
| Extra clinician minutes per visit | 8 | 15 | Assumption | |
| Wage loading for benefits | 0% | 30% | Assumption applied to national median wages | |
Wages are national medians from the Bureau of Labor Statistics; changing any assumption changes the corresponding category and nothing else.
The Annual Range
Adding the three priced categories gives about $21,500 to $84,700 a year in staff and clinician time, most of it falling on the outside practices, whose staff and clinicians absorb the first and third categories. The figure is modest, and it is presented as a range because a single number would imply a precision the assumptions do not support.
Costs Left Unpriced
Two costs are larger in principle and are deliberately not priced. The first is readmissions. Maryland data tie late completion to more readmissions (Hoyer et al., 2016), and Ontario patients whose clinician had the summary in hand were readmitted somewhat less often, a difference too small to be statistically reliable (van Walraven et al., 2002). Neither study isolates transmission, and neither supports an attributable fraction that could be applied to Larchmont's readmissions without inventing precision. The second is the accountable care relationship: practices that repeatedly see patients without summaries may weaken their participation, which could cost shared savings. Both are named so a reader knows they exist, and neither is added to the total.
What the Estimate Supports
The priced cost is not large enough on its own to justify a major purchase, which is itself a useful finding for an organization that had begun shopping for a platform. Its main value is in showing where the time is lost, at practices and at visits, and in separating the measurable cost from the unpriced risks that make the problem matter.
References
Hoyer, E. H., Odonkor, C. A., Bhatia, S. N., Leung, C., Deutschendorf, A., & Brotman, D. J. (2016). Association between days to complete inpatient discharge summaries with all-payer hospital readmissions in Maryland. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 11(6), 393-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2556
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2026). Occupational employment and wage statistics: National estimates for occupations 43-6013, 29-1071 and 29-1229 [Data set]. https://www.bls.gov/oes/
van Walraven, C., Seth, R., Austin, P. C., & Laupacis, A. (2002). Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(3), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10741.x
DDHA 9901 Week 6 instructions, in plain terms
The cost estimate usually asks you to put a figure on your problem as it runs today, not on any solution. Build the estimate as a chain and show every link: a unit cost attributed to a published schedule, wage series or internal rate, a frequency taken from your evidence rather than memory, and the combination into an annual figure. Report the result as a range, because a single number implies precision the inputs do not have. Keep cost categories separate rather than folding them together. Put every assumption in a block a reader can check, with low and high values. Name costs you cannot price, and explain why, rather than adding them with invented precision. Write so that a skeptical reader can change any assumption and see what moves.
How the DDHA 9901 Week 6 example is put together
The estimate opens by stating that it prices the problem, not a fix. A frequency section derives about 2,270 late summaries a year from discharge counts and transmission data. A unit cost section cites national median wages and explains the benefit loading. Three category sections price practice staff time, hospital staff time and clinician time at visits, each with its assumptions and range. A fourth category records discharges with no clinician recorded, unpriced. Table 1 lists every assumption with low and high values and its basis. The annual range section sums the categories and notes who bears most of the cost. A section names readmissions and partnership strain as unpriced, and a closing section explains what the modest total implies.
Reading the DDHA 9901 Week 6 rubric
Cost estimates are graded on traceability. Markers check that each unit cost has a named source, each frequency comes from evidence and each assumption is visible. Reporting a range rather than a point estimate shows appropriate humility. Keeping categories separate allows readers to evaluate them independently. Naming unpriced costs, and explaining why they are unpriced, demonstrates integrity, while adding speculative costs with false precision loses credit. Arithmetic must be correct and consistent between text and table. The conclusion should interpret the figure in light of the decision it informs. Citations should include data sources in APA format. Graders also look for the estimate's modest size to be interpreted rather than inflated.
Common DDHA 9901 Week 6 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The most frequent problem is a total with no visible chain behind it. Show each link. Use published wage data rather than guesses, and say whether you loaded for benefits. Take frequencies from your evidence log. Keep categories apart so readers can accept some and challenge others. Report a range. Resist adding large costs you cannot support, such as readmissions, unless you can show the link for your specific problem. Check every calculation twice. If your cost estimate feels shaky, we can help you build a traceable chain with clearly labeled assumptions. Finally, ask a colleague in finance to test one assumption; if it survives, say so.
Get a DDHA 9901 Week 6 example written to your instructions
Send the prompt, the rubric and the frequency evidence the estimate has to build on, and a costed problem with a full assumptions block and a stated range comes back inside 24-48 hours, the first at no cost. Financial ledgers held by a working organization stay behind its own logins.
More DDHA 9901 papers and DHA samples
- DDHA 9901 Week 1: Complaint Testing Post
- DDHA 9901 Week 2: Context Memo
- DDHA 9901 Week 3: Problem Statement
- DDHA 9901 Week 4: Evidence Log
- DDHA 9901 Week 5: Benchmark Comparison
- DDHA 9901 Week 7: Stakeholder Map
- DDHA 9901 Week 8: Provenance Critique
- DDHA 9901 Week 9: Scope Boundary
- DDHA 9901 Week 10: Identification Paper
- DDHA 9901 Week 11: Reflection Post
- DDHA 9500 Week 6: Literature Summary
- DDHA 8801 Week 6: Access Promise Post
- DDHA 8703 Week 6: Causal Claim Discussion Post
- DDHA 8006 Week 6: Contestable Claim Post
DDHA 9901 Week 6 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DDHA 9901 Week 6 sample paper?
The traceable cost estimate for late discharge summaries is free to read here.
What does the DDHA 9901 Week 6 estimate price?
The staff and clinician time absorbed each year by summaries that reach outside practices late.
Where do the wage figures come from?
National median hourly wages from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for secretaries, physician assistants and physicians.
What is the annual cost range?
Roughly $21,500 to $84,700 a year, most of it borne by the outside practices.
Why are readmission costs left unpriced?
The available studies measure completion delays or availability, not delivery, so no attributable fraction can be supported.