| Course | DDHA 8801 Building Healthcare Brand and Alliances |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 2 |
| Paper type | Service area market analysis |
| Length | About 1,040 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Healthcare Administration (DHA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DDHA 8801 Week 2
Adult Joint Care in Brown County, Wisconsin, Counted Rather Than Described: A Service Area Analysis Built Only From Published Figures, Each With Its Agency and Year
Student Name
Walden University
DDHA 8801: Building Healthcare Brand and Alliances
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Adult Joint Care in Brown County, Wisconsin, Counted Rather Than Described: A Service Area Analysis Built Only From Published Figures, Each With Its Agency and Year
The Market Being Analyzed
This analysis draws the market before counting anything in it. The service area is Brown County, Wisconsin, which includes Green Bay and its suburbs and lies almost entirely within about a 30-minute drive of central Green Bay. The service line is adult joint care: evaluation and treatment of hip and knee arthritis, from a first orthopedic visit through joint replacement and rehabilitation. The analysis supports positioning work for Bayshore Health, a composite health system used throughout this course, whose orthopedic program serves the county. Bayshore is invented; the county figures are real, and each is attributed to the agency that published it.
The Figures
The population figures come from the American Community Survey (U.S. Census Bureau, 2025), the prevalence estimates from the PLACES project (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2025) and the clinician count from Medicare's public file of enrolled clinicians (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2026). One derived figure is useful: applying the arthritis prevalence to the county's roughly 213,900 adults suggests about 54,000 adults with diagnosed arthritis. That is an estimate built from two published figures, not a published count, and it inherits the uncertainty of the prevalence range.
Table 1
Brown County, Wisconsin: Published Figures Bearing on Adult Joint Care
| Figure | Value | Issuing agency and source | Year covered | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total population | 273,909 | U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 1-year, Table B01001 | 2024 | |
| Residents aged 55 to 64 | 34,275 (12.5%) | Census Bureau, Table B01001 | 2024 | |
| Residents aged 65 to 74 | 29,365 (10.7%) | Census Bureau, Table B01001 | 2024 | |
| Residents aged 75 to 84 | 14,171 (5.2%) | Census Bureau, Table B01001 | 2024 | |
| Residents aged 85 and over | 4,423 (1.6%) | Census Bureau, Table B01001 | 2024 | |
| Aged 35 to 64 with employer-based coverage only | 70,002 of 103,379 (67.7%) | Census Bureau, Table B27010 | 2024 | |
| Aged 35 to 64 with no health insurance | 4,432 of 103,379 (4.3%) | Census Bureau, Table B27010 | 2024 | |
| Aged 65 and over with Medicare only | 24,020 of 47,210 (50.9%) | Census Bureau, Table B27010 | 2024 | |
| Aged 65 and over with Medicare and a directly purchased plan | 8,488 of 47,210 (18.0%) | Census Bureau, Table B27010 | 2024 | |
| Aged 65 and over with Medicare and Medicaid | 3,255 of 47,210 (6.9%) | Census Bureau, Table B27010 | 2024 | |
| Adults reporting diagnosed arthritis, crude prevalence | 25.2% (22.6% to 27.7%) | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PLACES, from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System | 2023 | |
| Adults with a mobility disability, crude prevalence | 12.6% (10.6% to 14.8%) | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PLACES | 2023 | |
| Adults with obesity, crude prevalence | 41.1% (36.1% to 46.1%) | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PLACES | 2023 | |
| Medicare-enrolled clinicians with orthopedic surgery as primary specialty and a Green Bay practice address | 56 | Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Doctors and Clinicians file | Accessed October 2026 | |
Ranges in parentheses are the 95% confidence intervals PLACES publishes with its model-based county estimates; insurance shares are of the civilian noninstitutionalized population in each age group.
How the Figures Were Gathered
The census figures were retrieved through the Census Reporter interface to the 2024 one-year estimates, the PLACES estimates through the CDC's open data portal and the clinician count through a query of Medicare's provider data catalog, filtered to orthopedic surgery as the primary specialty and to Green Bay practice addresses on the retrieval date. One-year survey estimates carry margins of error that are not shown in the table; for groups of the size reported here they are small relative to the figures, but the insurance shares in particular should be read as approximate. Anyone repeating the analysis can rebuild every row from these three sources.
What the Table Shows
Three movements in the table bear on positioning. First, the age groups at which hip and knee arthritis most often leads to orthopedic care are large. Residents aged 55 to 74 number about 63,600, nearly a quarter of the county, and those aged 65 to 74 alone number about 29,400. These are people with years of active life ahead, many still working.
Second, coverage differs sharply by age. Among residents aged 35 to 64, two thirds hold employer coverage only and about 4% are uninsured. Among those 65 and over, half report Medicare alone and nearly a fifth combine Medicare with a plan they bought themselves. The survey does not separate Medicare Advantage from traditional Medicare, so it cannot say how many older residents are in plans with restricted networks, which matters greatly for any orthopedic program trying to win referrals.
Third, the supply of orthopedic surgeons is substantial. Fifty-six Medicare-enrolled clinicians with orthopedic surgery as their primary specialty list a practice address in Green Bay, about 20 for every 100,000 county residents. That count includes surgeons who may spend part of their time elsewhere and excludes those who list another city, so it is approximate in both directions. It suggests a market where access to an orthopedic surgeon is not scarce in general, so a program cannot win simply by being available.
High obesity and mobility disability figures matter as well: obesity is a recognized risk factor for knee arthritis, and a mobility disability affects how easily a patient can reach a clinic and complete rehabilitation.
What the Figures Cannot Say
The table counts people and clinicians; it does not count procedures. County-level hospital discharges by service line are compiled by Wisconsin's hospital association but are sold rather than published, so this analysis does not use them and makes no claim about market share. The figures also cannot say which providers residents already use, how many are in Medicare Advantage plans or how strongly they prefer one system over another. Those questions need the competitor review and audience work that follow, and some of them need data Bayshore would have to buy or collect.
Implication for Positioning
The figures point away from competing on availability and toward a specific group: residents aged 55 to 74 with arthritis, many still working, most with employer coverage before 65 and Medicare after. In a county with many orthopedic surgeons, Bayshore's position will have to rest on something other than having them.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). PLACES: Local data for better health, county data 2025 release [Data set]. https://data.cdc.gov/resource/swc5-untb
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2026). Doctors and clinicians national downloadable file [Data set]. https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/dataset/mj5m-pzi6
U.S. Census Bureau. (2025). American Community Survey 1-year estimates, 2024: Tables B01001 and B27010, Brown County, Wisconsin [Data set]. https://data.census.gov/
What the DDHA 8801 Week 2 instructions ask for
For Week 2 the task is a service area portrait for one service line, made only of published numbers. Define the market first: a named county or set of postal codes, the service line and a travel-time edge. Then build a table in which every row carries a figure, the agency that issued it and the year it covers, so that any reader can verify it. Use counts and rates rather than adjectives. Include population by age band, insurance coverage, a measure of need such as disease prevalence, volumes where available and provider supply. Read the table for the two or three movements that bear on positioning. Close by naming what the figures cannot tell you and which data would be needed to fill the gap. Keep any derived estimate clearly labeled as derived.
How the DDHA 8801 Week 2 example is put together
The paper opens by defining Brown County as the service area, adult joint care as the service line and a drive time as the edge, and it states that the health system is composite while the county figures are real. Table 1 lists fourteen figures, each with its value, issuing agency and year. A paragraph cites the three sources and derives an estimate of adults with arthritis, labeled as derived. A section explains how each source was retrieved. The interpretation section reads the large 55 to 74 population, the coverage shift between working age and Medicare age, including the survey's inability to separate Medicare Advantage, and the surgeon supply per 100,000 residents. A section names the county discharge data that are sold rather than published, and a closing paragraph draws the implication for positioning.
Where the marks sit in the DDHA 8801 Week 2 rubric
Market analyses are graded on verifiability. Markers expect the market defined before any counting, with clear geographic and service boundaries. Every figure should carry its source and year; unsourced numbers or impressions presented as facts cost credit. Counts and rates should replace adjectives. The interpretation should be selective, drawing out only the movements that matter for positioning. Honesty about gaps, especially missing volume data, shows integrity. Derived estimates should be labeled and explained. Clear tables and accurate citations of data sources in APA format are expected, and the analysis should avoid claims about market share that the data cannot support.
DDHA 8801 Week 2 help: mistakes that cost marks
The most common weakness is a market description built from general statements such as "an aging population" without numbers. Find the actual counts. Another is mixing sources without saying which figure came from where. Put the agency and year beside every number. Define your geography carefully so others can reproduce it. Do not invent volume or market share figures; if they are not public, say so and explain what you would need. Keep interpretation tied to the decision ahead. For your own service area, we can assemble the same kind of table from public sources, each row attributed.
Get a DDHA 8801 Week 2 example written to your instructions
Send the assignment prompt, the rubric and the geography the classroom expects, and a market analysis in this shape comes back to you with every figure attributed and none invented. The first custom sample is free and arrives inside 24 to 48 hours. Volume reports an employer holds under license are not requested at any point.
More DDHA 8801 papers and DHA samples
- DDHA 8801 Week 1: Brand Promise Discussion Post
- DDHA 8801 Week 3: Competitor Review
- DDHA 8801 Week 4: Audience Profile
- DDHA 8801 Week 5: Positioning Statement
- DDHA 8801 Week 6: Access Promise Post
- DDHA 8801 Week 7: Community Notice
- DDHA 8801 Week 8: Reputation Response
- DDHA 8801 Week 9: Due Diligence Memo
- DDHA 8801 Week 10: Alliance Governance
- DDHA 8801 Week 11: Alliance Case
- DDHA 8703 Week 2: Metric Specification
- DDHA 8601 Week 2: Workflow Assessment
- DDHA 8503 Week 2: System Description
- DDHA 8303 Week 2: Researchable Problem Statement
DDHA 8801 Week 2 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DDHA 8801 Week 2 sample paper?
The Brown County joint care market analysis, with its sourced table, is free on this page.
What market does the DDHA 8801 Week 2 example analyze?
Adult hip and knee joint care in Brown County, Wisconsin, using real Census, CDC and CMS figures.
How many orthopedic surgeons does the analysis count?
Fifty-six Medicare-enrolled clinicians with orthopedic surgery as primary specialty at Green Bay practice addresses, about 20 per 100,000 residents.
What does the table show about insurance coverage?
About two thirds of residents aged 35 to 64 have employer coverage only, while half of those 65 and over report Medicare alone.
What can the figures not tell you?
Procedure volumes, market share, which providers residents use or how many older residents are in Medicare Advantage plans.