| Course | DDBA 9000 Doctoral Study Completion |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 7 |
| Paper type | Defense slide deck |
| Length | About 550 words, 5 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DDBA 9000 Week 7
Fifteen Slides That Let the Committee Examine the Study: A Defense Deck for a Case Study of How Small Online Apparel Shop Owners Reduced Product Returns, With Claim Titles, Speaker Notes and Backup Slides Keyed to the Manuscript
Student Name
Walden University
DDBA 9000: Doctoral Study Completion
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Fifteen Slides That Let the Committee Examine the Study: A Defense Deck for a Case Study of How Small Online Apparel Shop Owners Reduced Product Returns, With Claim Titles, Speaker Notes and Backup Slides Keyed to the Manuscript
Design Principles
The defense presentation has about twenty minutes before questions. The deck gives two slides to background and four to the themes, because the committee approved the problem and design long ago and is now judging the findings. Every main slide carries a claim title, a full sentence stating the slide's point, and every slide's speaker notes cite the manuscript page where the claim is supported.
Main Sequence
[after]
Table 1
Main Slides With Claim Titles
| No. | Claim title | Manuscript page | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Return strategies of small online apparel shop owners | Title page | |
| 2 | Returns cost the five shops 18 to 31 percent of revenue before the strategies | 3 | |
| 3 | The study asked what strategies owners used to reduce returns | 6 | |
| 4 | Customer behavior theory framed returns as a response to uncertainty about fit | 10 | |
| 5 | Five owners, interviews and three years of return data | 34 | |
| 6 | Thematic analysis traced each theme to at least two sources per case | 40 | |
| 7 | Theme 1: Fit information, not discounts, reduced returns most | 55 | |
| 8 | Theme 2: Photos of garments on varied body types cut size-related returns | 60 | |
| 9 | Theme 3: Charging for returns lowered returns but also repeat purchases | 64 | |
| 10 | Theme 4: Owners read return reasons weekly and changed product listings | 68 | |
| 11 | Small shops can apply these strategies without large systems | 74 | |
| 12 | Four recommendations, each with a cost and a measure | 78 | |
| 13 | Limits: five successful shops, one product category | 84 | |
| 14 | Contribution: evidence from small shops, which prior research rarely studies | 86 | |
| 15 | Questions | | |
Theme Slides
Each theme slide shows one quotation and one figure from the case data, no more. Slide 9, for example, quotes an owner who began charging a return fee and shows that shop's return rate falling from 24 to 15 percent while repeat purchases fell by about a fifth. The notes link the theme to Petersen and Kumar (2009), who found that customers' product returns were associated with greater future purchasing up to a point, which explains why a return fee can backfire: it discourages returns but also discourages the buying that returns enable.
Backup Slides
Eight backup slides answer likely questions: the interview protocol, the code tracking table showing saturation, the discrepant case of a shop whose returns rose, the member checking process, each shop's return data, the framework's fit, the cost estimates behind the recommendations and the confidentiality measures. Each backup slide is numbered so it can be called up quickly.
Why Claim Titles
A claim title lets committee members check the argument by reading titles alone, and it keeps the presenter from describing slides instead of making points. Yin (2018) emphasized that case study reports should let readers follow the chain of evidence from question to conclusion; the deck applies that to the spoken defense, with each claim tied to evidence in the manuscript. Braun and Clarke (2006) asked that every theme carry its own coherent account of the data, so each theme slide carries exactly one such account.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Petersen, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Are product returns a necessary evil? Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.3.035
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
What the DDBA 9000 Week 7 instructions ask for
Week 7 asks you to build the slide deck for your oral defense. Allocate slides by what the committee needs to judge now, giving more space to findings and application than to background and literature. Write each main slide's title as a full-sentence claim. Limit theme slides to one quotation and one figure. Add speaker notes citing the manuscript page behind each claim. Prepare numbered backup slides for likely questions, such as protocol, saturation, discrepant cases, member checking and cost estimates. Explain how the deck lets the committee follow the chain of evidence. Fifteen or so main slides and a handful of backups usually fit a twenty-minute presentation. Rehearse with a timer.
How the DDBA 9000 Week 7 example is put together
The sample's table lists all fifteen claim titles with manuscript pages, from returns costing 18 to 31 percent of revenue to the study's contribution on small shops. The theme slides section describes slide 9: an owner's return fee cut returns from 24 to 15 percent while repeat purchases fell by about a fifth, which the notes connect to research showing returns associated with future buying. The backup section lists eight slides, including the code tracking table and a shop whose returns rose. A closing section explains why claim titles keep the argument audible and tie spoken claims to written evidence. The recommendations slide carries owners, costs and measures from the manuscript, and the limits slide names the five successful shops. Each backup slide is numbered for quick recall during questions.
DDBA 9000 Week 7 rubric: what earns full marks
The deck is judged by how well it lets the committee examine the study. A presentation that spends half its slides on background and literature, then rushes the themes, has shown the committee the part of the study it already approved, and that weighting draws comment. Claim titles and uncluttered theme slides earn credit because they keep the argument audible. The recommendations slide is checked for owners, costs and measures carried over from the study. Backup slides that anticipate real questions show preparation. Speaker notes keyed to pages let the candidate answer from evidence. Consistency between slide claims and manuscript pages is checked, since a slide that overstates the study draws questions. Theme slides should stay uncluttered.
DDBA 9000 Week 7 help from the desk
Count the minutes you have and allot most of them to findings and recommendations. Write each slide title as the sentence you want the committee to remember. Strip theme slides to one quote and one number. Put page references in your notes. Make backup slides for the questions you most fear. Rehearse with the slides and a timer, and practice jumping to backup slides by number. Keep text on slides short; the speaker notes carry the detail. Rehearse answering from backup slides by number.
Get a DDBA 9000 Week 7 example written to your instructions
The Week 7 prompt and rubric, an outline of your sections and any time limit set for the defense are what the desk works from. A model deck with speaker notes and backup slides arrives in 24-48h, the opening request free. The slides present an apparel study that never took place, so the defense itself remains entirely yours.
More DDBA 9000 papers and DBA samples
- DDBA 9000 Week 1: Proposal Approval Packet
- DDBA 9000 Week 2: Ethics Board Application
- DDBA 9000 Week 3: Findings Chair Review
- DDBA 9000 Week 4: Committee Response Matrix
- DDBA 9000 Week 5: Practice Application Section
- DDBA 9000 Week 6: Defense Request Submission
- DDBA 9000 Week 8: Deposit-Ready Manuscript
- DBAX 8006 Week 7: Scheduling Consequence Analysis
- DDBA 8582 Week 7: Internal Redeployment Process
- DBAX 8101 Week 7: Study Alignment Check
- DDBA 8581 Week 7: Knowledge Transfer Plan
DDBA 9000 Week 7 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DDBA 9000 Week 7 sample paper?
The defense deck outline, claim titles and backup slides included, is free on this page.
What study does the DDBA 9000 Week 7 deck present?
A case study of how small online apparel shop owners reduced product returns.
How are the slides weighted?
Two slides go to background and four to themes, since the committee approved the design earlier.
What is a claim title?
A full-sentence slide title stating the slide's point.
What do backup slides cover?
Protocol, saturation, a discrepant shop, member checking, return data, framework fit, costs and confidentiality.