DDBA 8581 Week 9 Grow, Hire or Borrow Comparison Example

Succession Planning: A Survival Tool of the Fittest Walden University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This DDBA 8581 Week 9 grow, hire or borrow comparison example weighs three ways to close one gap: the Gulf distributor relationships a chemicals company lost when its regional sales director resigned. Walden DDBA 8581 asks students to judge options on whether the capability stays, not only on cost and speed, and the sample compares developing an inside sales lead who knows three of nine distributors, hiring an experienced director at about $185,000 plus a fee and borrowing an interim executive at about $25,000 a month. Bidwell's evidence that external hires cost more and perform worse at first, Groysberg, Lee and Nanda on the portability of star performance and Lepak and Snell's human resource architecture lead this DBA paper to interim cover plus development.

CourseDDBA 8581 Succession Planning: A Survival Tool of the Fittest
WeekWeek 9
Paper typeSourcing comparison
LengthAbout 760 words, 5 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolWalden University
ProgramDoctor of Business Administration (DBA)
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for DDBA 8581 Week 9

1

Grow, Hire or Borrow the Gulf Distributor Relationships: A Sourcing Comparison for One Capability Gap That Weighs Time to Performance, Cost, Failure Risk and the Risk That the Capability Walks Out Again

Student Name

Walden University

DDBA 8581: Succession Planning: A Survival Tool of the Fittest

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the three options and the four criteria, including the one cost-and-speed comparisons usually omit.
2

Grow, Hire or Borrow the Gulf Distributor Relationships: A Sourcing Comparison for One Capability Gap That Weighs Time to Performance, Cost, Failure Risk and the Risk That the Capability Walks Out Again

The Gap

The Week 5 bench review found that the Gulf regional sales director's distributor relationships exist only partly elsewhere: an inside sales lead knows three of the nine distributors. Since the director's resignation, the gap is open. This comparison weighs three ways to close it: develop the inside sales lead, hire an experienced director from outside or borrow an interim sales executive on contract while deciding.

What this page is doingThe comparison names one gap from the bench review, so the options are judged against a specific need.
3

The Comparison

[after]

Table 1

Three Options for the Gulf Distributor Relationships

CriterionDevelop the inside sales leadHire from outsideBorrow an interim executive |
Time to full performance12 to 18 months6 to 12 months1 to 2 months for coverage, not development |
Cost, first yearAbout $40,000 above current pay, plus coachingAbout $185,000 salary plus recruiting fee near $55,000About $25,000 a month |
Risk of failureModerate: never managed pricing authorityModerate: unknown fit, external hires often slower to performLow for coverage; none of the capability remains |
Risk the capability leaves againModerate: once trained, more marketableHigher: a hire from a competitor may leave as easily as arrivedCertain: leaves at contract end |

What the Research Says About Each

Bidwell (2011) studied an investment bank's employees and found that outsiders brought into comparable jobs earned noticeably more than promoted insiders, were rated less favorably during their first two years and quit at higher rates. The findings come from one firm in one industry, but they caution against assuming an outside hire will deliver faster.

Groysberg et al. (2008) studied star equity analysts who moved between firms and found that their performance often declined after the move, especially when they moved alone, because part of their performance depended on their former firm's resources and colleagues. Distributor relationships are partly personal and partly the company's: distributors buy products, service and terms the company provides, not only the director's attention. An outside director would bring relationships with other distributors but would have to build these nine.

Neither study proves that insiders always win. Developed insiders become more valuable to competitors, which is exactly how the company lost its director.

What this page is doingEach finding is reported with its limits, since overreading it would tilt the comparison.
4

The Framework

Lepak and Snell (1999) proposed that organizations should manage different kinds of human capital differently depending on how much it contributes to strategy and how specific it is to the firm: capabilities that are both valuable and firm-specific are best developed internally and retained through long-term commitment, while valuable but general capabilities can be acquired from the market. The Gulf relationships are highly valuable and partly firm-specific, which points toward development, supported by a retention arrangement.

Recommendation

Borrow an interim executive for four to six months to protect the nine relationships now, while developing the inside sales lead along a route like the Week 6 design, with a retention bonus vesting over three years. Revisit an outside hire if the lead's development stalls at six months.

Why Not Simply Hire the Best Outside Candidate

An outside director from a competitor might bring distributor relationships of their own and could be productive sooner than the inside sales lead. That is the strongest case for hiring. But the company's nine distributors are the ones at risk, and an outsider would have to earn their trust from scratch, as the portability research suggests. An outside hire would also cost more and, on the bank evidence, be more likely to leave, which would reopen the gap. The recommendation keeps the outside option open: if the inside lead's development stalls, the company will have used the interim period to learn what the role needs and can search with sharper criteria.

Retention Terms

The retention bonus for the inside sales lead should vest in thirds over three years and be paired with a clear path to the director title, so the company does not train a capable person for a competitor.

What Would Change the Recommendation

If the inside sales lead declines the role, or if two or more of the nine distributors signal they will follow the departed director, the case for an experienced outside hire strengthens sharply, and the search should begin at once.

Timing

The interim contract should start before the departing director's last day, so the nine distributors never face a week without a named contact.

Limits

Cost figures are estimates. The inside sales lead's willingness to take on the role has not been confirmed.

References

Bidwell, M. (2011). Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus internal mobility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 369-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211433562

Groysberg, B., Lee, L.-E., & Nanda, A. (2008). Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers' performance. Management Science, 54(7), 1213-1230. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0809

Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580439

The Walden DDBA 8581 Week 9 instructions

Week 9 asks you to compare ways of closing one capability gap from your bench review. Name the gap and at least three options, such as developing an insider, hiring from outside or borrowing through a contractor. Compare them in a table on time to performance, cost, risk of failure and the risk that the capability leaves again. Report research on external hiring and on the portability of performance accurately, including its limits. Apply a framework for deciding which capabilities to build and which to buy. Recommend, answer the strongest case for the alternative and say what would change your recommendation. Five to seven pages with one comparison table is typical.

How the DDBA 8581 Week 9 example is put together

The sample's table estimates 12 to 18 months for the inside lead, 6 to 12 for an outside director and 1 to 2 months for interim coverage that leaves nothing behind. The research section reports that external hires at one bank were paid more, rated lower early and left more often, and that star analysts' performance often fell after moving because part of it depended on their former firm. It notes that developed insiders also become marketable. The framework section places the relationships as valuable and partly firm-specific. The recommendation pairs interim cover with development and a retention bonus vesting over three years. A section explains why hiring the best outside candidate is not recommended now and when it would be.

DDBA 8581 Week 9 rubric: what earns full marks

The criteria set drives most of the grade. A comparison scoring options only on cost and speed has ignored the question this course keeps returning to, whether the capability stays, and graders mark its absence heavily. Accuracy with the external hiring and portability research matters next, and papers that cite it as proof that insiders always win have overread it. The build-or-buy framework earns marks when it is used to classify the specific capability. Answering the strongest case for hiring, and naming conditions that would reverse the recommendation, shows judgment. Including borrowing as an option, often forgotten, shows the comparison considered the full range of choices. Cost figures labeled as estimates, with their basis, keep the comparison honest.

DDBA 8581 Week 9 help: mistakes that cost marks

Pick one gap and list realistic options, including borrowing, which is often forgotten. Estimate time, cost and failure risk for each from your organization's experience. Add a row for the chance the capability leaves again, and think about why each option might lose it. Read the external hiring study and the portability study closely, noting their settings. Classify your capability by value and firm-specificity. Write down what would make you choose differently. Pair any development option with a retention arrangement, or the investment may walk out the door. Check the research settings before generalizing.

Get a DDBA 8581 Week 9 example written to your instructions

Name the capability gap your bench review found, or let the case supply one, and include the comparison assignment plus its marking sheet. A three-option table, the external hiring evidence and a fallback paragraph arrive within 24 to 48 hours, with nothing charged on the first. Contract and interim costs are sourced from published ranges.

More DDBA 8581 papers and DBA samples

DDBA 8581 Week 9 questions, answered

Where can I find a free DDBA 8581 Week 9 sample paper?

The grow, hire or borrow comparison is printed here in full, free of charge.

What gap does the DDBA 8581 Week 9 paper address?

The Gulf distributor relationships left uncovered by the regional sales director's resignation.

What do the external hiring studies show?

External hires often cost more, perform worse at first and leave more often, though settings vary.

What does the framework suggest?

Valuable, partly firm-specific capabilities are best developed internally and retained.

What does the paper recommend?

Interim cover now while developing the inside sales lead with a three-year retention bonus.