| Course | DDBA 8006 Contemporary Challenges in Business |
|---|---|
| Week | Week 8 |
| Paper type | Applied business proposal |
| Length | About 1,040 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Walden University |
| Program | Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for DDBA 8006 Week 8
From Offset Volume Into Short-Run Labels: An Applied Business Proposal Asking a Sixty-Person Commercial Printer's Owner to Approve a Digital Label Press, Retire One Offset Press and Sell Labels to Existing Clients Within Eighteen Months
Student Name
Walden University
DDBA 8006: Contemporary Challenges in Business
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
From Offset Volume Into Short-Run Labels: An Applied Business Proposal Asking a Sixty-Person Commercial Printer's Owner to Approve a Digital Label Press, Retire One Offset Press and Sell Labels to Existing Clients Within Eighteen Months
Executive Summary
Recommendation: approve the purchase of a digital label press and finishing line for $820,000, retire the older of the two offset presses and sell it for about $150,000, and begin selling short-run product labels and flexible packaging to existing clients within 18 months. The net investment is about $670,000. At the projected volume, label work would contribute about $880,000 a year by year three, against an offset business whose contribution has fallen about 6 percent a year for five years. The main risk is that existing clients buy fewer labels from Kessler than the client survey suggests; a staged rollout and a decision point at month twelve limit that risk.
The Organization and Its Problem
Kessler Printing, a composite commercial printer of 60 people in Grand Rapids, Michigan, prints brochures, catalogs, direct mail and annual reports for about 310 active clients, most of them regional manufacturers, food producers, health systems and colleges. Offset volume has fallen as clients move marketing to digital channels and shorten their print runs. Revenue fell from $11.4 million five years ago to $9.1 million last year. Both offset presses run below 60 percent of capacity. The owner has asked for a single recommendation on how to use the plant and staff for the next five years.
The Growth Choice, Classified
Ansoff (1965) classified growth moves by whether they involve new products, new markets or both. Selling a new product to existing customers is product development; selling new products to new customers is diversification, the riskiest of the four moves because the firm learns two unfamiliar things at once. Labels and flexible packaging are new products for Kessler. The question is whether the customers would be existing ones. The client list says yes, mostly. Of 310 active clients, sales representatives identified 118 that buy product labels or short-run packaging today, from other suppliers: food producers needing labels for seasonal products, manufacturers needing compliance labels, colleges selling branded goods. In a survey of 64 of those clients, 41 said they would consider buying labels from Kessler if quality and turnaround matched their current supplier. The move is therefore product development, aimed at clients Kessler already serves and bills.
Market Conditions
The short-run label segment has grown as brands produce more product variations in smaller quantities. Using the five forces lens applied earlier in the term (Porter, 1980), buyer power in this segment is moderate, since clients are many and small; supplier power is low; rivalry is real but fragmented among regional label printers; and digital equipment has lowered entry barriers, which is both why Kessler can enter and why others can too. The segment is attractive enough, not exceptionally so.
What Kessler Brings
The resource audit method from Week 3 (Barney, 1991) points to one advantage that is hard to copy: Kessler's existing billing relationships, approved-vendor status and stored brand files for 118 label buyers. A new label printer would have to win each client's trust, go through vendor approval and rebuild their brand color standards. Kessler already has those. Its prepress staff also already manage brand color for these clients. Equipment and skilled operators, by contrast, are available to any competitor.
The Financial Case
Over five years at the firm's 11 percent hurdle rate, and assuming year three's contribution holds, the project's net present value is positive at about $960,000. The case depends most on year two and three label revenue; if label sales reach only half the projection while the added fixed costs stay, net present value falls to about −$270,000, so the project does not survive a halving of demand. The Week 6 brief showed how to set such a condition, and it is set here as a decision point.
Table 1
Label Line Projection (thousands of dollars)
| Line | First year | Second year | Third year | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Label revenue | 600 | 1,400 | 2,100 | |
| Contribution at 42 percent | 252 | 588 | 882 | |
| Offset contribution lost from retiring one press | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Added fixed costs: two operators, maintenance, software | 210 | 220 | 230 | |
| Net added contribution | 42 | 368 | 652 | |
Retiring the older offset press loses no contribution because the remaining press can absorb current offset volume at about 90 percent of capacity.
The Plan
Months 1 to 4: order the press, sell the older offset press, train two operators from the current offset crew. Months 5 to 8: run label work for the 41 clients who expressed interest, at introductory prices. Months 9 to 12: extend sales to the remaining 77 known label buyers. Month 12: decision point. If label revenue is below $450,000 annualized, pause the second operator hire and reconsider pricing; if below $250,000, stop selling labels actively and keep the press for packaging prototypes. Months 13 to 18: if on track, begin selling to new clients outside the current list, which would be diversification and deserves its own review.
Measuring Success
Following the scorecard approach from Week 7 (Kaplan & Norton, 1996), the proposal sets four measures before launch: label contribution margin, share of the 118 known label buyers placing at least one order, on-time delivery for label jobs and number of operators certified on the press. Each has a target and a failure line agreed now.
Risks
Clients may order labels once and return to their established suppliers if Kessler's turnaround is slower. Digital label technology is changing, and the press may be outdated within seven years. Operators trained on offset presses may not adapt quickly. The staged plan and the month-twelve decision point limit the money at risk to about $250,000 of net cost if the line is stopped early, since the press could be resold.
The Request
Approve the $820,000 purchase and the sale of the older offset press at the next owner's meeting, with the month-twelve decision point written into the approval. If the owner prefers a smaller first step, the same plan works with a used label press at about $450,000, which lowers the money at risk but limits the packaging work Kessler could take on in year two.
References
Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw-Hill.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
What the DDBA 8006 Week 8 instructions ask for
The final week asks for a proposal that makes one recommendation to one decision maker and requests approval. Open with an executive summary the decision maker could approve from: the request, cost, expected return and main risk. Describe the organization's problem briefly. Classify the move using a growth or strategy framework and test the classification against evidence. Bring in earlier analyses, such as industry forces, resources, financial evaluation and measurement, only where they support or limit the recommendation. Present financial projections with assumptions and show what happens if the key assumption fails. Lay out a staged plan with a decision point. State risks honestly. End with the specific approval requested. Around ten pages is a typical length.
How the DDBA 8006 Week 8 example is put together
The proposal's summary states the net investment of about $670,000 after selling the older offset press and contribution reaching $880,000 a year by year three, with a staged rollout as the guard against weak demand. The problem section traces five years of falling offset volume. Ansoff's matrix classifies the move, and the client list tests it: 118 of 310 clients buy labels elsewhere and 41 of 64 surveyed would consider Kessler. Porter's forces rate the segment as attractive enough, and Barney's test finds the hard-to-copy asset in approved-vendor status and stored brand files. A projection table shows net added contribution rising to $652,000, a net present value of about $960,000 and a negative value if demand halves. A dated plan, a scorecard, risks and the request close it.
DDBA 8006 Week 8 rubric: what earns full marks
The proposal is graded on whether every section serves one recommendation. A tour of the term's frameworks, each applied for its own sake, reads as a review rather than a proposal and loses credit. The executive summary must stand alone. Classifying the move and testing the classification against evidence, such as the client list here, shows how framework and data work together. Financial projections earn credit when assumptions are stated and the key one is stress-tested honestly, even when the result is unfavorable. A staged plan with a decision point and a defined fallback shows the writer has planned for being wrong. Risks should be specific. The final request should be concrete enough for the decision maker to say yes or no at a meeting.
DDBA 8006 Week 8 help from the desk
The pitfall in a closing proposal is trying to show everything learned. Write the request first and test every section by asking whether it helps the decision maker approve or reject it. Use earlier frameworks only where they add evidence. Build projections from documents and explain each assumption. Run the key assumption at half its value and report what happens, even if the answer is uncomfortable. Plan in stages with a point at which the organization can stop. State risks plainly. Keep the executive summary to one page. If you are not sure how to stage your plan, our writers can help you set decision points around your projections.
Get a DDBA 8006 Week 8 example written to your instructions
Bring the Week 8 proposal instructions, the rubric and the earlier analyses the proposal builds on, and a complete applied proposal with its summary page, trade-offs and scorecard comes back in 24-48h, the first free. Name the decision-maker your section expects the proposal to address. The sample's organization is constructed; approval inside yours is not something a sample can supply.
More DDBA 8006 papers and DBA samples
- DDBA 8006 Week 1: Framework Choice Discussion
- DDBA 8006 Week 2: Five Forces Assessment
- DDBA 8006 Week 3: Resource Fit Audit
- DDBA 8006 Week 4: Data-Informed Pricing Post
- DDBA 8006 Week 5: TOWS Options Matrix
- DDBA 8006 Week 6: Capital Request Brief
- DDBA 8006 Week 7: Scorecard Measurement Plan
- DDBA 4990 Week 8: Funding Comparison
- DBAX 9104C Week 8: Disclosure Decisions
- DBAX 9104 Week 8: Contribution Sentence Drafts
- DBAX 9103C Week 8: Unwelcome Findings Paper
DDBA 8006 Week 8 questions, answered
Where can I find a free DDBA 8006 Week 8 sample paper?
The complete applied business proposal, from executive summary to request, is set out lower on this page, free to read.
What does the DDBA 8006 Week 8 proposal recommend?
That a commercial printer buy a digital label press, retire one offset press and sell short-run labels to existing clients within 18 months.
Why is the move product development rather than diversification?
The labels are new products, but most target buyers are existing clients; 118 of 310 already buy labels elsewhere.
What happens if label demand is half the projection?
Net present value turns negative at about −$270,000, which is why the plan includes a decision point at month twelve.
What does the proposal ask the owner to approve?
The $820,000 press purchase and the sale of the older offset press, with the month-twelve decision point written into the approval.