Computed for this year and last, the current ratio, gross margin and days sales outstanding anchor BUSI 3016's Week 3 ratio write-up, each movement explained plainly. Searches like "busi 3016 week 3 assignment example", "busi3016 week 3 sample" and "busi 3016 week 3 example" land here.
What a finished BUSI 3016 Week 3 ratio write-up looks like
The write-up begins with a small table: three ratios, two columns for last year and this year, and a column for the change, all figures illustrative. The current ratio falls from 1.8 to 1.3, gross margin from 38 to 34 percent, and days sales outstanding rises from 30 to 45. Each ratio then gets a paragraph that follows one path: what it measures, how it was computed from the supplied statements, what moved, and the likeliest reason. The reasons connect. A large apartment complex retrofit billed on 60-day terms explains the slower collections, and fixed-bid installations signed before an equipment price increase explain the thinner margin. Closing the write-up, a paragraph states what the three movements say together, and what they cannot say without more information, such as whether the retrofit customer is likely to pay.
How a BUSI 3016 Week 3 example is structured
The table comes first so the reader has all six numbers in view before any explanation, and the change column saves them the subtraction. Paragraphs follow the table's sequence, not a ranking by importance, which lets anyone check the write-up against the figures. Inside each paragraph the formula appears once, in words, so the computation can be reproduced without the reader knowing the notation. Causes are offered as likely rather than proven, since the statements show that collections slowed but not why. The connecting paragraph at the end does the work a list of ratios cannot: it shows that one contract explains two of the three movements, which is the kind of reading the course calls translation. A closing sentence on missing information stops the write-up short of a verdict on the firm.
Six numbers in one table
Three ratios for two years, with a change column, give the reader every figure before any explanation begins.
Each formula in words
Current assets over current liabilities, gross profit over revenue, and receivables over daily sales are written out once so anyone can recompute them.
A slower collection cycle
Days sales outstanding climbing from 30 to 45 is traced to an apartment complex retrofit billed on 60-day terms.
Margin squeezed by fixed bids
Installations priced before an equipment increase explain most of the four-point fall in gross margin.
One contract, two movements
The retrofit accounts for both the slower collections and part of the weaker current ratio, which the closing paragraph makes explicit.
Where marks go in BUSI 3016 Week 3
Arithmetic takes a small, fixed slice of the grade; explanation takes the rest. A ratio correctly computed and followed by a sentence restating it earns the slice and very little more. Credit grows with the comparison: stating that days sales outstanding rose from 30 to 45 means something, while 45 alone means almost nothing. Causes are marked for fit. Attributing slower collections to a named contract with long payment terms, as the example does, outscores a general remark about customers paying late. Units are checked closely, since a margin falling from 38 to 34 percent has dropped four points, not four percent. The connecting paragraph is where strong write-ups separate. Declaring the business unhealthy on the strength of three ratios is the overreach that draws the sharpest comment.
Get a BUSI 3016 Week 3 example written to your instructions
Share the ratio prompt, its rubric and the statements handed out with it, and the ratios are computed from those and explained against the prior period, 24 to 48 hours, first one free. Both years of figures belong to a contractor that does not exist, so none describes a real firm's condition.
BUSI 3016 Week 3 questions, answered
Is there a right number of ratios to cover?
Whatever your prompt names, and no more than a handful when the choice is yours. The example uses three from different families: one for short-term obligations, one for pricing and cost, one for collections. Covering ten ratios thinly leaves no room for the explanations that carry the grade, while three explained well show the reading the course wants from you.
What if I cannot tell why a ratio moved?
Say so, and name the information that would settle it. The example offers causes as likely rather than certain and ties each to something in the case, such as payment terms on one contract. Where your prompt gives no such detail, a sentence naming two possible explanations and the record that would distinguish them, such as an aging report, reads as careful work.
Should the write-up compare the company with its industry?
Only if your prompt supplies an industry figure or asks you to find one from a named source. The example compares against the prior year because that is what the week asks. Industry averages for small private contractors are hard to source reliably, and an unsourced benchmark weakens a paragraph more than a plain comparison with the prior period does.